Exploring the Relationship between Classroom Arrangement and Students’ Performance in Cambodian Higher Education: The Role of Self-Regulation

Authors

  • Chumneanh Lork School of Business and Management, Lincoln University College, Malaysia
  • Dhakir Abbas Ali School of Business and Management, Lincoln University College, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60072/ijeissah.2025.v4i01.002

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of classroom arrangement on students’ academic performance in Cambodian higher education, with particular emphasis on the mediating role of self-regulation. A quantitative approach was adopted, using data collected from 320 university lecturers through a structured questionnaire. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed to test the proposed model. The findings reveal that classroom arrangement plays a significant role in shaping students’ self-regulation and academic performance. Moreover, self-regulation not only contributes directly to students’ academic success but also mediates the relationship between classroom arrangement and students’ performance. These results highlight the importance of both classroom arrangement and students’ self-regulatory abilities in achieving positive educational outcomes. The study suggests that universities should prioritize effective classroom design and implement strategies that strengthen self-regulation to enhance overall learning achievement.

Keywords:

Cambodian Universities, Classroom Arrangement, Mediating Effect, Physical Learning Space, Students’ Performance

References

Aristovnik, A., Karampelas, K., Umek, L., & Ravšelj, D. (2023). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on online learning in higher education: a bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1225834. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2023.1225834/BIBTEX

Baepler, P., Walker, J., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.

Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational Research: Determining Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1). https://www.opalco.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Reading-Sample-Size1.pdf

Bashir, A., Bashir, S., Rana, K., Lambert, P., & Vernallis, A. (2021). Post-COVID-19 adaptations: the shifts towards online learning, hybrid course delivery and the implications for biosciences courses in the higher education setting. Frontiers in Education, 6, 711619. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2021.711619/BIBTEX

Chin, W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. Management Information Systems Research Center, 22(1), 7–11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/249674

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Credé, M., & Kuncel, N. (2008). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x

Creswell, J. W. ., & Guetterman, T. C. . (2024). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. In Pearson (7th ed.). Pearson. One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458. Tel: 800-848-9500; Web site: http://www.pearsoned.com/.

Hair, J. F., Tomas, G., Hult, M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). http://study.sagepub.com/

Harper, C. V., McCormick, L. M., & Marron, L. (2024). Face-to-face vs. blended learning in higher education: a quantitative analysis of biological science student outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-023-00435-0

Hattie, J. (2023). Visible Learning: The Sequel: A Synthesis of Over 2,100 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Visible Learning: The Sequel: A Synthesis of Over 2,100 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement, 1–497. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542/VISIBLE-LEARNING-SEQUEL-JOHN-HATTIE/RIGHTS-AND-PERMISSIONS

Heng, K., & Sol, K. (2021). Academic research in Cambodia: Progress, challenges, and ways forward. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 6-23.

Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928

Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Jin, S. H., Im, K., Yoo, M., Roll, I., & Seo, K. (2023). Supporting students’ self-regulated learning in online learning using artificial intelligence applications. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-023-00406-5

Jung, H., Park, S. W., Kim, H. S., & Park, J. (2022). The effects of the regulated learning-supported flipped classroom on student performance. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(1), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12528-021-09284-0

Karabatak, S., & Polat, H. (2020). The effects of the flipped classroom model designed according to the ARCS motivation strategies on the students’ motivation and academic achievement levels. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1475–1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-019-09985-1/METRICS

Karaman, P. (2024). Effects of using rubrics in self-assessment with instructor feedback on pre-service teachers’ academic performance, self-regulated learning and perceptions of self-assessment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(3), 2551–2574. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10212-024-00867-W

Kassab, S. E., Rathan, R., Taylor, D. C. M., & Hamdy, H. (2024). The impact of the educational environment on student engagement and academic performance in health professions education. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1278. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12909-024-06270-9

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Mantooth, R., Usher, E. L., & Love, A. M. A. (2021). Changing classrooms bring new questions: Environmental influences, self-efficacy, and academic achievement. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10984-020-09341-Y

Moore, M. (1993). Is teaching like flying? A total systems view of distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649309526806

Nikolopoulou, K., & Zacharis, G. (2023). Blended Learning in a Higher Education Context: Exploring University Students’ Learning Behavior. Education Sciences, 13(5), 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI13050514

Nunnally, J. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. In Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders (pp. 97–146). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4

Onah, D. F. O., Pang, E. L. L., & Sinclair, J. E. (2022). An investigation of self-regulated learning in a novel MOOC platform. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36, 57–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09346-x

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

Peng, L., Deng, Y., & Jin, S. (2022). The Evaluation of Active Learning Classrooms: Impact of Spatial Factors on Students’ Learning Experience and Learning Engagement. Sustainability, 14(8), 4839. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14084839/S1

Ramayah, T., Chuah, F., Cheah, J.-H., & Ting, H. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An Updated and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis (1st ed.). Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd.

Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Saykılı, A. (2019). Higher education in the digital age: The impact of digital connective technologies. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.516971

Shams, M. S., Niazi, M. M., Gul, H., Mei, T. S., & Khan, K. U. (2022). E-Learning Adoption in Higher Education Institutions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multigroup Analysis. Frontiers in Education, 6, 783087. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2021.783087/BIBTEX

Simon, P. D., Jiang, J., Fryer, L. K., King, R. B., & Frondozo, C. E. (2024). An Assessment of Learning Management System Use in Higher Education: Perspectives from a Comprehensive Sample of Teachers and Students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(2), 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10758-024-09734-5

Smadi, M., Masri, A. Al, & Maharmah, H. (2024). Exploring the Correlation between Self-regulated Learning Strategies and Academic Success in Higher Education. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 2875–2883. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1276466

Yang, W., Xijun, W., & Jiahui, D. (2023). Impact of smart classrooms in higher education on academic performance: a meta-analysis. Regional Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 8(2), 135–148. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/rjikm/article/view/263066

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective (pp. 13–39). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7

Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct Validation of a Strategy Model of Student Self-Regulated Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284

Published

23-12-2025

How to Cite

Lork, C., & Ali, D. A. (2025). Exploring the Relationship between Classroom Arrangement and Students’ Performance in Cambodian Higher Education: The Role of Self-Regulation. International Journal of Emerging Issues in Social Science, Arts and Humanities ( IJEISSAH), 4(1), 09-21. https://doi.org/10.60072/ijeissah.2025.v4i01.002

Metrics