The Convergence of Gender, Ecological, and Colonial Oppressions: A Postcolonial Ecofeminist Examination of J.M. Coetzee's Waiting for the Barbarians

Authors

  • Zhang Lan Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Amalia Qistina Castaneda Abduliah Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Mok Soon Sim Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31674/ijmhs.2026.v10i01.001

Abstract

Background: Postcolonial literature increasingly highlights the entanglement of gender, ecological, and racial oppressions, yet much scholarship still treats these dimensions separately, limiting systemic engagement with interconnected subjugations. Objective: J.M. Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians presents a narrative terrain where female bodies, land, and animals are simultaneously subjected to colonial and patriarchal power. This study aims to examine how the text constructs the “Triple Other”, women, land, and animals, as mutually reinforcing sites of oppression and explore the intersections of colonial, gendered, and ecological domination. Methods: Guided by a postcolonial ecofeminist framework, this research conducts a qualitative close reading of the barbarian girl’s bodily injuries, shifting borderland landscapes, and depictions of animal suffering. The analysis focuses on narrative strategies of corporeality, spatiality, and nonhuman suffering to uncover structural intersections of domination. Results: Through these scenes, the study identifies symbolic patterns and ethical interventions that expose the systemic workings of power. The analysis demonstrates that the female body, the border environment, and nonhuman life operate as linked grounds through which empire enforces its hierarchy of livability. Conclusion: By integrating human and nonhuman oppression, the study advances postcolonial ecofeminist readings beyond single-axis approaches. It contributes a model for examining interdependent violence and fosters cross-disciplinary discussions of relational life.

Keywords:

Animals, Land, Postcolonial Ecofeminism, Waiting for the Barbarians, Woman

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, C. J. (1995). Woman-battering and harm to animals: Connecting the dots. In J. Dunayer, L. Birke, & M. Kheel (Eds.), Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explorations (pp. 55–84). Duke University Press. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780822381952_A35715841/preview-9780822381952_A35715841.pdf

Badoux, C. (1974). Françoise d'Eaubonne,«Le Féminisme ou la Mort», éd. P. Horay [Françoise d'Eaubonne, "Feminism or Death", ed. P. Horay]. Les cahiers du GRIF, 4(1), 66-67. https://www.persee.fr/doc/grif_0770-6081_1974_num_4_1_945_t1_0066_0000_3

Biti, V. (2023). (Anti) Barbarous Empires: JM Coetzee’s Iconoclasm in Waiting for the Barbarians. European Review, 31(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798722000539

Bonsu, E. M., & Mensah, M. (2022). A postcolonial feminist reading of JM Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians (2000). International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 6(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v6i1.3937

Brazal, A. M. (2021). Ethics of care in Laudato Si’: A postcolonial ecofeminist critique. Feminist Theology, 29(3), 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/09667350211000

Brings, R. (2024). Whiteness and the Animal Question: Revisiting Coetzee's Postapartheid South Africa. ariel: A Review of International English Literature, 55(3), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1353/ari.2024.a941675

Coetzee, J. M. (1999). JM Coetzee-Waiting for the Barbarians (Penguin Great Books of the 20th Century). Penguin Books. https://digitallibrary.srisathyasaicollege.in/bitstream/123456789/6879/1/J.%20M.%20Coetzee%20-%20Waiting%20for%20the%20Barbarians%20%28Penguin%20Great%20Books%20of%20the%2020th%20Century%29%20%281999%29.pdf

Dagamseh, A. M. (2022). JM Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians Revisited: From Apartheid to Neoliberalism. SAGE Open, 12(4), 21582440221129848. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221129848

Dang, T. K. (2021). Decolonizing landscape. Landscape Research, 46(7), 1004-1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2021.1935820

Deka, P. K. (2022). Coetzee's Animal Ethics. Journal of Animal Ethics, 12(2), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.12.2.04

Gaard, G. (2011). Ecofeminism revisited: Rejecting essentialism and re-placing species in a material feminist environmentalism. Feminist Formations, 23(2), 26–53. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/448630

Gain, K. (2025). Decolonial ecofeminism: a paradigmatic contribution to critical research of gender, ecology and coloniality. Journal of Gender Studies, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2025.2489582

Geçikli, K. (2023). The anti-speciesist stance in JM Coetzee’s novels: an analysis of animal-standpoint. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 33(1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724

Hawkins, R. (2012). Shopping to save lives: Gender and environment theories meet ethical consumption. Geoforum, 43(4), 750-759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.12.009

Lutfi, L. A. (2022). Post-Colonial Discourse: The Impact of Imperial Elements on JM Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians. Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timişoara Transactions on Modern Languages, 18, 34-45. https://doi.org/10.59168/OMFW9380

Mukherjee, S. (2023). Liminal Landscapes of Otherness: Postcolonial Interpretations of The Self and the Other in JM Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians. Creative Saplings, 2(08), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.56062/gtrs.2023.2.05.363

Nair, S. (2025). Postcolonial ecofeminist responses to the International Labour Organisation’s Just Transition framework. Third World Quarterly, 46(5), 575-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2487815

Neimneh, S. S. (2022). Imperialism and Gender in JM Coetzee's Waiting for the Barbarians. Language Teaching, 2(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.30560/lt.v2n2p1

Pinto, S. (2025). JM Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians: A portrayal of inter-racial relationships. Al-Shodhana, 13(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.70644/as.v13.i1.3

Plumwood, V. (1991). Nature, self, and gender: Feminism, environmental philosophy, and the critique of rationalism. Hypatia, 6(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00206.x

Plumwood, V. (2002). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203006757

Poyner, J. (2016). JM Coetzee and the paradox of postcolonial authorship. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315590233

Sam, C. A., & Bonsu, E. M. (2022). A postcolonial feminist reading of JM Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians (2000). International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 6(1), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v6i1.3937

Scarry, E. (2020). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world (pp. 324–326). Routledge. https://iberian-connections.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Scarry-The-Body-in-Pain-excerpt-1985.pdf

Shiva, V., & Mies, M. (2014). Ecofeminism. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://dl1.cuni.cz/pluginfile.php/1165830/mod_resource/content/1/Mies%2C%20Shiva%2C%20Salleh%20-%20Ecofeminism.pdf

Sinha, N. (2021). “I see what I have been dreading”: Witnessing Food and Violence in Waiting for the Barbarians and In the Heart of the Country. Digital Literature Review, 8(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.33043/DLR.8.1.27-35

Spivak, G. C. (2023). Can the subaltern speak? In Imperialism (pp. 171–219). Routledge. (Original work published 1988) http://users.uoa.gr/~cdokou/TheoryCriticismTexts/Spivak-Subaltern.pdf

Published

08-01-2026

How to Cite

Lan, Z., Abduliah, A. Q. C., & Sim, M. S. (2026). The Convergence of Gender, Ecological, and Colonial Oppressions: A Postcolonial Ecofeminist Examination of J.M. Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians. International Journal of Management and Human Science (IJMHS), 10(1), 01-10. https://doi.org/10.31674/ijmhs.2026.v10i01.001

Metrics