Probability of Hereditary Effects Due to Dose Radiation on X-Ray Radiography Examination

Authors

  • Ratnawati I Gusti Agung Ayu Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Udayana University, Badung 80361, Bali, Indonesia
  • Suryatika Ida Bagus Made Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Udayana University, Badung 80361, Bali, Indonesia
  • Sutapa Gusti Ngurah Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Udayana University, Badung 80361, Bali, Indonesia
  • Gunawan Anak Agung Ngurah Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Udayana University, Badung 80361, Bali, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31674/mjmr.2026.v010i02.002

Abstract

Introduction: This study estimates the risk of hereditary diseases related to X-ray radiation in conventional radiography, conducted at the Bali Academy of Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Engineering using a Raysafe Multimeter. The focus is on stochastic radiation effects, including hereditary and cancerous impacts. These effects, which occur without a specific dose threshold, are linked to mutations in somatic and germinal cells that contribute to cancer and genetic disorders. The goal was to assess the hereditary risk by measuring radiation doses through the Entrance Surface Dose (ESD). Methods: Key variables measured during the radiographic procedure included output voltage (kV), exposure time (s), current output (mA), and radiation dose exposure (mGy). These measurements were used to calculate the ESD, which helped estimate hereditary risks for critical organs. Data collected with the Raysafe Multimeter was analyzed to establish the relationship between radiation dose and hereditary risk. Results: The study found that the lowest ESD value was 0.3737 mGy with 40 kV voltage, and the highest was 0.7328 mGy at 80 kV. It also showed that the first generation (Generation I) had a higher probability of hereditary effects than the second generation (Generation II). This was attributed to the cells' ability to repair radiation-induced damage over time, with the second generation benefiting from more opportunities for repair. Conclusion: The risk of hereditary diseases is influenced by the ESD and the cell’s repair ability. The second generation faces lower hereditary risk due to natural repair processes, underscoring the need for careful radiation exposure management in radiography.

Keywords:

Absorbed Dose;, Critical Organs;, ESD;, Hereditary Risk;, Radiation Exposure

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alomairy, N., Hadi, D., Al-Zaid, A., Fasikh, R., Arif, R., Al-Hazmi, R., ... & Shubayr, N. (2023). Evaluation of the Entrance Surface Doses (ESD) for common diagnostic X-ray examinations. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 16(4), 100754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2023.100754

Andriati, S., Irka, F. H., Firmawati, N., Wahyuni, A., & Fardela, R. (2024). Determination of Radiation Dose Rate in Radiology Installations Using Raysafe X2 Surveymeter. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 10(2), 458-470. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v10i2.7841

Calabrese, E. J., & Selby, P. B. (2025). More fraudulent history of cancer risk assessment: The US National Academy of Sciences Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation (BEAR) I Genetics Panel used falsified data greatly exaggerating hereditary/cancer risks. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 419, 111640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2025.111640

Chang D S., Lasley F D., Das I J., Mendonca M S., Dynlacht J R., 2021, Stochastic, Deterministic, and Heritable Effects (and Some Radiation Protection Basics), Basic Radiotherapy Physics and Biology, Pages 337–348 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61899-5_34

Choudhuri, S., Kaur, T., Jain, S., Sharma, C., & Asthana, S. (2021). A review on genotoxicity in connection to infertility and cancer. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 345, 109531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2021.109531

da Silveira, G. S. B., Neves, L. P., Alves, A. D. S. B. Z., de Souza Santos, W., & Perini, A. P. (2026). Organ and skin dose assessment in neonatal chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 113621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2026.113621

Duan, Y., Li, X., Lu, P., Yang, C., Wang, K., Zhang, D., ... & Li, B. (2024). High-voltage ESD protection devices with high robustness of 13 kV and strong radiation tolerance up to 200 krad (Si). IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 71(6), 3518-3524. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2024.3389932

Elamri, N., Tahiri, M., El Baydaoui, R., & Mkimel, M. (2025). Evaluation of radiation dose and cancer risk for paediatric digital radiography in a Moroccan hospital. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 227, 112352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112352

Goudarzi, Y., Monirvaghefi, K., Aghaei, S., Amiri, S. S., Rezaei, M., Dehghanitafti, A., ... & Rajabivahid, M. (2024). Effect of genetic profiling on surgical decisions at hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. Heliyon, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34375

Ibrahim I. K., Hassan F. F., Abdulkareem N. K. (2020). Effective dose calculation for patients undergoing X-ray examinations in Erbil Hospitals. International Electronic Journal of Medicine, 9(3), 121-123. https://doi.org/10.34172iejm.2020.22

Imaoka, T., Nishimura, M., Daino, K., & Kakinuma, S. (2023). Modifiers of radiation effects on breast cancer incidence revealed by a reanalysis of archival data of rat experiments. Journal of Radiation Research, 64(2), 273-283. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrac090

Jafarian F and Hoeschen S C., 2025, Low-Dose radiation risk in medicine: a look at risk models, challenges, and future prospects. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik, 35(4), 393-400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.07.002

Kanzaki, Y., Kuramoto, T., Takarabe, S., Shibayama, Y., Yoshikawa, H., & Kato, T. (2023). Effect of high-and low-energy entrance surface dose allocation ratio for two-shot dual-energy subtraction imaging on low-contrast resolution. Radiography, 29(1), 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.007

Keenahan, L., Ahsan, M. D., Mecklai, A., & Frey, M. K. (2025). Navigating dual risks: Ovarian cancer prevention and cardiovascular health in patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. Gynecologic Oncology Reports, 61, 101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2025.101940

Liu, Z., Ali, M., Sun, Q., Zhang, Q., Wei, C., Wang, Y., ... & Li, X. (2024). Current status and future trends of real-time imaging in gastric cancer surgery: A literature review. Heliyon, 10(16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36143

Mothersill, C., Seymour, C., Cocchetto, A., & Williams, D. (2024). Factors influencing effects of low-dose Radiation exposure. Health Physics, 126(5), 296-308. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001816

Rajeev, R., Mohanty, P., Datta, S. S., & Moitra, P. (2025). Recent advances in point-of-care testing devices for transfusion medicine. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 118490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2025.118490

Rayan, A. M., Adam, A., Al-Arabi, G., & Ahmed, M. R. (2025). The applications of X-ray technology in medical imaging: advances, challenges, and future perspectives (A review). Journal of Sustainable Food, Water, Energy and Environment, 1(2), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.21608/jsfw.2025.409882.1003

Reis, C. S. D., Gulizia, M., Champendal, M., De Labouchere, S., Sun, Z., & Silva, C. (2023). Plain radiography has a role to play in current clinical practice in Western Switzerland. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 54(4), 670-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2023.08.007

Romodin, L. A., Umnikov, A. S., & Samoilov, A. S. (2025). Biological Reactions under the Combined Action of Ionizing Radiation with Other Factors. Мedical Radiology and Radiation Safety, 70(3), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-3-22-33

Stewart, F. A., Akleyev, A. V., Hauer-Jensen, M., Hendry, J. H., Kleiman, N. J., Macvittie, T. J., ... & Wallace, W. H. (2012). ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs—threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Annals of the ICRP, 41(1-2), 1-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001

Suliman, I. I. (2020). Estimates of patient radiation doses in digital radiography using DICOM information at a large teaching hospital in Oman. Journal of Digital Imaging, 33(1), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-019-00199-y

Tandon, R., & Srivastava, N. (2025). Unravelling exosome paradigm: Therapeutic, diagnostic and theranostics application and regulatory consideration. Life Sciences, 366, 123472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2025.123472

Utami, L. R. W., & Alfiani, N. (2024). Elbow joint radiography examination procedure in post open reduction internal fixation cases in the radiology installation of Kendal District Hospital. Journal of Applied Health Management and Technology, 6(2), 100-105. https://doi.org/10.31983/jahmt.v6i2.11107

Published

06-04-2026

How to Cite

I Gusti Agung Ayu , R., Ida Bagus Made, S., Gusti Ngurah , S., & Anak Agung Ngurah, G. (2026). Probability of Hereditary Effects Due to Dose Radiation on X-Ray Radiography Examination. Malaysian Journal of Medical Research (MJMR), 10(2), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.31674/mjmr.2026.v010i02.002

Metrics