Early Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion Post-Thrombolysis Using Narrow Blood Pressure Shock Index as a Diagnostic Indicator

Authors

  • Gurjeet Singh a/l Harvendhar Singh Hospital Selayang, Lebuhraya Selayang -Kepong, 68100 Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Leong Chong Hern Hospital Selayang, Lebuhraya Selayang -Kepong, 68100 Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31674/mjmr.2025.v09i03.009

Abstract

Emergency departments manage a wide range of life-threatening conditions that span both surgical and medical domains. Among these, acute cardiac emergencies require immediate and specialized intervention. Cardiac life support is crucial in such scenarios, and the integration of cardiac critical care into emergency settings has increasingly gained importance. Timely acute cardiac intensive care can be life-saving, especially in cases involving complications following myocardial infarction. One advanced technique that has become a focal point for emergency physicians in cardiac critical care is pericardiocentesis, particularly when performed under ultrasound guidance. This minimally invasive procedure, although technically demanding, has been employed with varying success rates in emergency departments. It plays a pivotal role in addressing pericardial effusion—a potentially fatal condition when it progresses to cardiac tamponade. Notably, pericardial tamponade is a rare, yet life-threatening complication of thrombolytic therapy used in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Therefore, early detection and prompt management are essential to avert serious consequences. A key tool in the early identification of hemodynamic instability is the Blood Pressure Shock Index (BPSI), defined as the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure. A narrow BPSI serves as a sensitive early indicator of impending circulatory collapse. This report highlights a clinical case where the identification of a narrow BPSI led to timely pericardiocentesis, ultimately resulting in the successful management of a pericardial effusion that developed post-thrombolysis. This case underscores the value of combining clinical acumen with diagnostic tools to guide lifesaving interventions in emergency care.

Keywords:

Blood Pressure Shock Index (BPSI), Cardiac Critical Care, Pericardial Effusion, Pericardiocentesis, Thrombolysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Damluji, A. A., Van Diepen, S., Katz, J. N., Menon, V., Tamis-Holland, J. E., Bakitas, M., ... & American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. (2021). Mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 144(2), e16-e35. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000985

Kakkos, S. K., de Ceniga, M. V., & Naylor, R. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of peri-procedural outcomes in patients undergoing carotid interventions following thrombolysis. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 62(3), 340-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.06.003

Levy, D., Sharma, S., Grigorova, Y., Farci, F., & Le, J. (2024). Aortic dissection. StatPearls.

Mohebbi, B. (2022). ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In Practical Cardiology (pp. 395-411). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-80915-3.00039-9

Mori, H., Shibata, E., Kuwazuru, T., Uchimura, T., Kondo, E., & Yoshino, K. (2021). The utility of shock index and heart rate in the management of postpartum blood loss in pregnant women complicated with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 47(9). https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14896

Published

08-07-2025

How to Cite

a/l Harvendhar Singh, G. S. ., & Hern, L. C. . (2025). Early Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion Post-Thrombolysis Using Narrow Blood Pressure Shock Index as a Diagnostic Indicator. Malaysian Journal of Medical Research (MJMR), 9(3), 77-81. https://doi.org/10.31674/mjmr.2025.v09i03.009

Metrics