“BEING LESS IS NEVER LEAST” UNRAVELING CREATIVITY AMONG OLDER ADULTS WITH DISABILITY

Authors

  • Jose Mari Louis G. Alforque Faculty, College of Nursing, Cebu Normal University, Philippines

Abstract

The objective of this study is to validate the first proposition of the Theory of Creative Aging, which stated “Creativity does not decline with age, however with physical disabilities; it limits the level of creativity.”  This study utilized a qualitative multiple case study approach.  A multiple case study enables the researcher to analyze within each and across setting. Several cases are examined to understand the similarities and difference between cases in a multiple case study.  After the analysis of data utilizing qualitative content analysis method(Hsieh and Shannon, 2005). Four themes emerged from the shared experiences of the participants being involved in this study: (1) Turning Point: At the onset of Disability; (2) There is more to Life; (3.) Family as a major source of Support and Inspiration; and (4) Faith beyond the Mishaps. Being disabled and creative at the same time does not make one different.  The creative capacity is not fully eradicated but there are some limitations, as long as one is capable of expressing and carrying out the task, then everything is possible.  A creativity of an individual is relative to his health.  For one to continue with his creative pursuit, it is important that he has the passion to create and a healthy disposition to fully express his creativity.  However, experiencing any physical disability lessens a person’s ability to create and time to adapt to changes is essential.

Keywords:

Case study, Creativity, Disability, Faith, Life, Qualitative content analysis, Transition

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alforque, J. M. L.G. (2016). It's Never Too Late To Create: ATheory of Creative Aging. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, College of Nursing, Cebu Normal University: Cebu City, Philippines.

Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Creek, J. (2008). Creative Leisure Opportunities. Neuro Rehabilitation,23(4), pp 299-304.

Dacey, J. S. (1989). Discriminating characteristics of the families of highly creative adolescents. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 23(4), pp 263-271.

Gustafson, T. (2014). Why Creative People Age Better. The Hufftington Post. Available at: http://wwwngtonpost.ca/timi-gustafson/creative-.hufpeople-aging_b_5622062.html

Hsieh, H. F. & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitativecontentanalysis.QualitativeHealth Research, 15(9), pp 1277-1288.

Hume, S.C. & Hiti, J.N. (1988). Arationale and model for group art therapy with mentally retarded adolescents. American Journal of Art Therapy,27(1), pp 2-12.

Lambert, J. (2016). How Your Family affects Creativity and Your Content Marketing Success. Schaefer Marketing Solutions. Available at: http://www.businessesgrow.com/2014/07/10/family-affects-creativity/

Lew, K. and Cho, J. (2013). Relationship among Creativity, Motivation and Creative Home Environment of Young Children. AST2013, ASTLVol, 20, pp. 106 – 110.

Lynch, R.T. & Chosa, D.(1996).Group-oriented community-basedexpressiveartsprogrammingfor individuals with disabilities: Participant satisfaction and perceptions of psychosocialimpact.Journalof Rehabilitation,62(3), pp 75-81.

Mayring, P. (2000) Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research,1(2). Available at: http://www.qualitative Patton,

M.Q. (2001) Qualitative Rresearch.net/index.php /fqs/article/viewArticle/1089/2385esearchand Evaluation Methods. 3rd edition, SAGE Publications

Thousand Oaks, CA.Polit, D. & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 7th Edition. Lippincott William and Wilkins: Philadelphia.

Reynolds, F. & Prior, S. (2003). Alifestyle coat-hanger: Aphenomenological study of the meanings of artwork for women coping with chronic illness and disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(14), pp 785-794.

Vasey, S. (1992) Disability arts and culture: an introduction to key issues and questions. In S. Lees (Ed.), Disability arts and culture papers (pp. 10-12). London: Shape.

Wright, C. & Wright, S. (1986). Aconceptual framework for examining the family's uencein on creativity. Family Perspective,20, pp 127-136.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Downloads

Published

03-04-2017

How to Cite

Jose Mari Louis G. Alforque. (2017). “BEING LESS IS NEVER LEAST” UNRAVELING CREATIVITY AMONG OLDER ADULTS WITH DISABILITY . Malaysian Journal of Medical Research (MJMR), 1(2), 1-7. Retrieved from https://ejournal.lucp.net/index.php/mjmr/article/view/120

Metrics