Economic Globalization and Income Inequality

Authors

  • Hu Licong Department of Management, Lincoln University, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor D. E., Malaysia
  • Yan Hui Department of Management, Lincoln University, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor D. E., Malaysia
  • Amiya Bhaumik Department of Management, Lincoln University, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor D. E., Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31674/ijrtbt.2021.v07i03.008

Abstract

The potential for economic progress has been constrained in recent decades by growing income disparity. Using panel data methodologies and policy simulations, this study examines the impact of economic globalisation on income inequality in both a cross-country and country-specific context. The sample includes post-liberalization developed, developing, and least-developed nations. The findings reveal that globalisation has, generally speaking, reduced inequality in advanced nations while having the reverse impact in low-income ones. Trade and FDI have opposing effects on income distribution; trade makes it worse, but FDI is good for all countries and helps to lessen income inequality. It has been discovered that FDI has a higher effect on lowering income disparity. The policy simulations demonstrate that India may lessen income disparity by emulating the policies of middle- and high-income countries. The effects of economic globalisation on income inequality globally have been examined in a sizable body of econometric work. It is challenging to derive reliable conclusions since stated econometric estimations vary widely. The link between globalisation and inequality is summarised quantitatively and analysed in this work. Making use of a brand-new dataset with 1,254 observations from 123 primary research. They arrive at a number of key conclusions by using meta-analysis and meta-regression techniques. First, there is a small to moderate increase in inequality as a result of globalisation. Second, whereas the impact of trade globalisation is negligible, the impact of financial globalisation on inequality is much larger and substantially stronger. Third, both developed and developing nations see an average increase in inequality as a result of globalisation. Fourth, technology and education mitigate the effects of globalisation on economic disparity.

Keywords:

FDI, Globalization, Inequality, ICT, Trade Openness

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buckley, P. J., Strange, R., Timmer, M. P., & de Vries, G. J. (2020). Catching-up in the global factory: Analysis and policy implications. Journal of International Business Policy, 3(2), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00047-9

Goda, T., & Torres García, A. (2016). The Rising Tide of Absolute Global Income Inequality During 1850–2010: Is It Driven by Inequality Within or Between Countries? Social Indicators Research, 130(3), 1051–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1222-0

Heimberger, P. (2020). Does economic globalisation affect income inequality? A meta‐analysis. The World Economy, 43(11), 2960–2982. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13007

Hickel, J., Dorninger, C., Wieland, H., & Suwandi, I. (2022). Imperialist appropriation in the world economy: Drain from the global South through unequal exchange, 1990–2015. Global Environmental Change, 73, 102467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102467

Hui, Y., & Bhaumik, A. (2023). Economic Globalization and Income Inequality: A Review. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management and Technology (AJMT), 3(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.46977/apjmt.%202023.v03i04.001

Mary, S., & Stoler, A. (2021). Does agricultural trade liberalization increase obesity in developing countries?. Review of Development Economics, 25(3), 1326-1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12757

Nasir, M. A., Canh, N. P., & Lan Le, T. N. (2021). Environmental degradation & role of financialisation, economic development, industrialisation and trade liberalisation. Journal of Environmental Management, 277, 111471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111471

Omori, R., Mizumoto, K., & Chowell, G. (2020). Changes in testing rates could mask the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) growth rate. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 94, 116–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.021

Permanyer, I., & Scholl, N. (2019). Global trends in lifespan inequality: 1950-2015. PLoS One, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215742

Santoro, F., Groening, E., Mdluli, W., & Shongwe, M. (2020). To file or not to file? another dimension of non-compliance: The Eswatini Taxpayer Survey. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/15578

Zainudin, R., Mahdzan, N. S., & Mohamad, N. N. (2021). Internationalisation and financial performance: in the case of global automotive firms. Review of International Business and Strategy, 31(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/ribs-04-2020-0039

Published

16-02-2024

How to Cite

Licong, H. ., Hui, Y. ., & Bhaumik, A. . (2024). Economic Globalization and Income Inequality. International Journal on Recent Trends in Business and Tourism (IJRTBT), 7(3), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.31674/ijrtbt.2021.v07i03.008

Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)