GENDER DIVERSITY IN BOARDROOM AND DIFFERENT COMMITTEES: A STUDY WITH REFERENCE TO BSE SENSEX 30 COMPANIES

Authors

  • Rozy Lasker Bhairab Ganguly College, West Bengal, India
  • Amit Majumder Bijoy Krishna Girls’ College, Howrah, India

Abstract

A gender diversified Board leads to multidimensional vision in an organizational structure. As psychological construct of woman brings a whole new and different perception about the situation and influences decision making of management. For this purpose, unbiased treatment towards the woman in the Board is the need of the hour. The gender composition of the board can affect the quality of financial and monitoring performance of the organization. Researchers like Ruth Mateos de Cabo, Claude Francoeur, Kevin Campbell aimed at investigating the impact of women directors on the performance of the company. Women held the 17.9% of the board seats of Fortune 1000 companies in 2015. This percentage is getting elevated day by day. The women directors in Scandinavian countries like Norway, Sweden, Denmark occupied high proportion of Board seat. On the other hand, European countries like France and Germany also have significant presence of women directors. In India, with effect from 1st April 2015, it is compulsory to appoint at least one-woman director in the category of company under section 149(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. In this context, the objective of the study is to investigate the presence of women directors and its impact of the companies under S&P BSE Sensex 30 companies before and after enforcement of legislature. After a careful observation, it is concluded that degree of diversity with reference of different personal affiliation is less intense in board of S&P BSE SENSEX companies. Though some of the companies like CIPLA, INFOSYS go beyond the legal compulsion and compose their board with higher degree of diversified gender representation.

Keywords:

Psychological Construct, Gender Diversity, Legal Compulsion

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, R. & Ferreira, D. (2007). A Theory of Friendly Boards. Journal of Finance, 62(1), pp 217-250.

Afsharipour, A. (2009). Corporate Governance Convergence: Lessons from the Indian Experience. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 29(2), pp 335-402.

Campbell, K. & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), pp 435-451.

Carter, D.A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B.J. & Simpson, W.G. (2010). The Gender and Ethnic Diversity of US Boards and Board Committees and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), pp 396-414.

Carter, D.A., Simkins, B.J. & Simpson, W.G. (2003). Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value, The Financial Review, 38(1), pp 33-53.

Catalyst (2015): Report: 2014 Catalyst Census: Women Board Directors. Catalyst, 13th January. Retrieved From:"http://www.catalyst.org/research/2014-catalyst-census-women-board-directors/"

Chakrabarti, R., Megginson, W.L. & Yadav, P.K. (2007). Corporate Governance in India. CFR Working Paper, No. 08-02, Centre for Financial Research (CFR), Cologne.

Chakrabarti, R., Megginson, W.L. & Yadav, P.K. (2007). Corporate Governance in India. CFR Working Paper, No. 08-02, Centre for Financial Research (CFR), Cologne.

Dobbin, F. & Jung, J. (2011). Corporate Board Gender Diversity and Stock Performance: The Competence Gap or Institutional Investor Bias? North Carolina Law Review, 89(3), pp 809-838.

Farrell, K.A. & Hersch, P.L. (2005). Additions to Corporate Boards: The Effect of Gender.Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1-2), pp 85-106.

Francoeur, C., Labelle, R. & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2008). Gender Diversity in Corporate Governance and Top Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), pp 83-95.

Hambrick, D.C. & Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), pp 193-206.

Joecks, J., Pull, K. & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?” Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), pp 61-72.

Nielsen, S. & Huse, M. (2010). The Contribution of Women on Boards of Directors: Going Beyond the Surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), pp 136-148.

Smith, N., Smith, V. & Verner, M. (2006). Do Women in Top Management Affect Firm Performance? A Panel Study of 2,500 Danish Firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), pp 569-593.

Soares, R. (2014): Increasing Gender Diversity on Boards: Current Index of Formal Approaches. Catalyst, 8th August. Retrieved From: https://www.catalyst.org/research/increasing-gender-diversity-on-boards-current-index-of-for mal-approaches/

Downloads

Published

01-07-2019

How to Cite

Rozy Lasker, & Amit Majumder. (2019). GENDER DIVERSITY IN BOARDROOM AND DIFFERENT COMMITTEES: A STUDY WITH REFERENCE TO BSE SENSEX 30 COMPANIES. International Journal on Recent Trends in Business and Tourism (IJRTBT), 3(3), 99-107. Retrieved from https://ejournal.lucp.net/index.php/ijrtbt/article/view/752

Metrics