Application of Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior Model in the Study of Influencing Factors of Social Participation in Stroke
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. It causes a range of complex physical, communication, cognitive, and emotional impairments that limit patients' ability to participate in social activities, severely impacting the quality of life of stroke survivors. Many studies have identified factors that influence social participation after stroke, including social environment, mental health, and functional factors (motor, cognitive, and language). Combined with the literature review on the influencing factors of social participation of stroke patients, a theoretical framework was proposed to guide the study, namely the COM-B theoretical model. The content of each element of the COM-B model was defined through a panel discussion. Based on the COM-B model and the theoretical framework, a hypothesis model of influencing factors of stroke social participation was proposed to form a conceptual framework. Its goal is to help us better understand the important factors that influence the social participation of patients after stroke, and to establish a theoretical basis for the successful reintegration of stroke survivors into daily life. As a result, this will provide strong evidence-based support for recovery, facilitate patient reintegration and contribute to overall recovery and improved quality of life for stroke survivors.
Keywords:
stroke, social participation, COM-B, influencing factorsReferences
Alaszewski, A., Alaszewski, H., Potter, J., & Penhale, B. (2007). Working after a stroke: Survivors’ experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(24), 1858–1869. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280601143356
Babulal, G. M., & Tabor Connor, L. (2016). The measure of stroke environment (MOSE): Development and validation of the MOSE in post-stroke populations with and without aphasia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 23(5), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2016.1143697
Bergström, A., Guidetti, S., Tham, K., & Eriksson, G. (2017). Association between satisfaction and participation in everyday occupations after stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 24(5), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2016.1245782
Bettiga, D., Lamberti, L., & Noci, G. (2018). Investigating social motivations, opportunity and ability to participate in communities of virtual co‐creation. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(1), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12409
Cardol, M., De Haan, R. J., Van Den Bos, G. A. M., De Jong, B. A., & De Groot, I. J. M. (1999). The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: The Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clinical Rehabilitation, 13(5), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921599668601325
Della Vecchia, C., Préau, M., Haesebaert, J., Viprey, M., Rode, G., Termoz, A., Dima, A., & Schott, A.-M. (2023). Factors associated with post-stroke social participation: A quantitative study based on the ICF framework. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 66(3), 101686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101686
Della Vecchia, C., Viprey, M., Haesebaert, J., Termoz, A., Giroudon, C., Dima, A., Rode, G., Préau, M., & Schott, A.-M. (2021). Contextual determinants of participation after stroke: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(13), 1786–1798. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1679897
dos Santos Barros, V., Bassi-Dibai, D., Guedes, C. L. R., Morais, D. N., Coutinho, S. M., de Oliveira Simões, G., Mendes, L. P., da Cunha Leal, P., & Dibai-Filho, A. V. (2022). Barthel Index is a valid and reliable tool to measure the functional independence of cancer patients in palliative care. BMC Palliative Care, 21(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01017-z
Ezekiel, L., Collett, J., Mayo, N. E., Pang, L., Field, L., & Dawes, H. (2019). Factors Associated With Participation in Life Situations for Adults With Stroke: A Systematic Review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(5), 945–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.017
Gingrich, N., Bosancich, J., Schmidt, J., & Sakakibara, B. M. (2023). Capability, opportunity, motivation, and social participation after stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 30(5), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2022.2070358
Hashemzadeh M., Rahimi A., Zare-Farashbandi F., Alavi-Naeini A. M., & Daei A. (2019). Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavioral Change: A Systematic Review. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 24(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_94_17
Hewetson, R., Cornwell, P., & Shum, D. (2018). Social participation following right hemisphere stroke: Influence of a cognitive-communication disorder. Aphasiology, 32(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2017.1315045
Howlett, N., Schulz, J., Trivedi, D., Troop, N., & Chater, A. (2019). A prospective study exploring the construct and predictive validity of the COM-B model for physical activity. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(10), 1378–1391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317739098
Howlett, N., Schulz, J., Trivedi, D., Troop, N., & Chater, A. (2021). Determinants of weekly sitting time: Construct validation of an initial COM-B model and comparison of its predictive validity with the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Psychology & Health, 36(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1763994
Levasseur, M., Lussier-Therrien, M., Biron, M. L., Raymond, É., Castonguay, J., Naud, D., Fortier, M., Sévigny, A., Houde, S., & Tremblay, L. (2022). Scoping study of definitions of social participation: Update and co-construction of an interdisciplinary consensual definition. Age and Ageing, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab215
Ma, Q., Li, R., Wang, L., Yin, P., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Ren, Y., Qian, Z., Vaughn, M. G., McMillin, S. E., Hay, S. I., Naghavi, M., Cai, M., Wang, C., Zhang, Z., Zhou, M., Lin, H., & Yang, Y. (2021). Temporal trend and attributable risk factors of stroke burden in China, 1990–2019: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Public Health, 6(12), e897–e906. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00228-0
McArthur, C., Ziebart, C., Papaioannou, A., Cheung, A. M., Laprade, J., Lee, L., Jain, R., & Giangregorio, L. M. (2018). “We get them up, moving, and out the door. How do we get them to do what is recommended?” Using behaviour change theory to put exercise evidence into action for rehabilitation professionals. Archives of Osteoporosis, 13(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0419-7
Michie, S., Van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
Morone, G., & Pichiorri, F. (2023). Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Challenges and New Perspectives. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020550
Silva, S. M., Corrêa, J. C. F., Pereira, G. S., & Corrêa, F. I. (2019). Social participation following a stroke: An assessment in accordance with the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(8), 879–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1413428
Üstün, T. B., Chatterji, S., Bickenbach, J., Kostanjsek, N., & Schneider, M. (2003). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A new tool for understanding disability and health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(11–12), 565–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963828031000137063
Wang, R., Ren, J., Li, S., Bai, X., Guo, W., Yang, S., Wu, Q., & Zhang, W. (2022). Efficacy evaluation of Buyang Huanwu Decoction in the treatment of ischemic stroke in the recovery period: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.975816
Whiteneck, G. G., Harrison-Felix, C. L., Mellick, D. C., Brooks, C. A., Charlifue, S. B., & Gerhart, K. A. (2004). Quantifying environmental factors: A measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(8), 1324–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.027
Williams, O. A., & Demeyere, N. (2021). Association of Depression and Anxiety With Cognitive Impairment 6 Months After Stroke. Neurology, 96(15), e1966–e1974. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000011748
Willmott, T., & Parkinson, J. (2017). Motivation, opportunity, and ability: Understanding new habits and changes adopted for weight management. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12340
Wilson, C., & Marselle, M. R. (2016). Insights from psychology about the design and implementation of energy interventions using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Energy Research & Social Science, 19, 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.06.015
Yenew, C., Dessie, A. M., Gebeyehu, A. A., & Genet, A. (2023). Intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine and its health belief model (HBM)-based predictors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 19(1), 2207442. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2207442
Yi, X., Luo, H., Zhou, J., Yu, M., Chen, X., Tan, L., Wei, W., & Li, J. (2020). Prevalence of stroke and stroke related risk factors: A population based cross sectional survey in southwestern China. BMC Neurology, 20(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1592-z
Zhang, L., Sui, M., Yan, T., You, L., Li, K., & Gao, Y. (2017). A study in persons later after stroke of the relationships between social participation, environmental factors and depression. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31(3), 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516641300
