Nursing-Based Diabetes Self-Management Education for Controlling Peripheral Artery Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Mulyaningsih*, Wahyuni, Hermawati, Noviana Ayu Ardika

Department of Nursing, Universitas ‘Aisyiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57146, Indonesia

*Corresponding Author’s Email: mulyaningsih@aiska-university.ac.id

ABSTRACT

Background: Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) is a significant complication of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM). PAD is an obstructive atherosclerotic vascular disease that interferes with the arteries, causing problems or changes in the circulation of the legs. Adherence to the four pillars of diabetes management—including diet, physical activity, medication adherence, and monitoring. Objectives: To analyze the effect of Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) on controlling PAD in Type 2 Diabetes. Methods: This research employs a quasi-experimental method and was conducted over 16 weeks, from August to November 2024, at the Gajahan and Pucang Sawit Community Health Centers in Surakarta. The selected respondents were 79, with the criteria of suffering from diabetes for 2 years and not having diabetic foot ulcers. Respondents were divided into two groups: the intervention group, with 40 participants, and the control group, with 39 participants. Results: The analysis revealed a significant difference in ankle-brachial index (ABI) values (p = 0.001) and foot sensitivity (p = 0.001) between the intervention group and the control group after the intervention. The mean ABI of the intervention group (0.99) was lower than that of the control group (1.16). In contrast, the mean sensitivity of the intervention group (9.74) was higher than the mean of the control group (8.36). Conclusion: DSME can control PAD by improving foot sensitivity, but 3 months is not enough time to improve the Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI).

Keywords: Ankle-Brachial Index; Diabetes Mellitus; Foot Sensitivity; Self-Management Education

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increasing worldwide. The global number of adults living with diabetes is projected to reach 589 million by 2025, representing 11.1% of all adults. The number of cases is expected to rise to more than 850 million by 2050 (Duncan et al., 2025). The increase in diabetes is due to population growth, aging, unhealthy diets, obesity, and sedentary lifestyles. Diabetes patients can implement alternative management and treatment strategies through self-care health education approaches. Self-care health education management can help type 2 diabetes patients by teaching them how to apply the Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) method (Bakara & Kurniyati, 2022).

Diabetes Mellitus type 2 (DM Type 2) can result in a wide variety of complications. WHO data shows that type 2 diabetes (type 2 diabetes) can cause many complications that are harmful to the health of sufferers. The number of cases of type 2 diabetes that have complications has increased in recent years (Niu et al., 2024). Thus, people with type 2 diabetes have a two- to three-fold risk of death from various causes of death (Peimani et al., 2024). This disease increases every year and causes many complications, one of which is peripheral vasculopathy.

The main complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus is diabetic foot ulcers, which occur in 15% of people (van Netten et al., 2024). Local complications of DM disease include damage to the arteries, which causes patients to be unable to walk far or close due to insufficient oxygen flow to the leg muscles, causing numbness or numbness (Staniszewska et al., 2024). Peripheral neuropathy and secondary ischemia caused by peripheral vascular disease are the leading causes of ulcers (Rodrigues et al., 2022). Peripheral neuropathy can occur due to repeated damage to sensory nerve fibers. In addition, skin surface damage and ulcers are caused by the deposition of glucose metabolism products, such as advanced glycosylation end products, in the blood vessels of the lower limbs (Rodrigues et al., 2022).

Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) is an obstructive atherosclerotic vascular disease that interferes with the arteries, causing problems or changes in the circulation of the legs (Zúnica-García et al., 2024). Increased risk of cardiovascular disease and amputation is associated with PAD (Staniszewska et al., 2024). The risk of PAD will increase with age, the duration of diabetes, and the presence of primary neuropathy (Perks et al., 2023). Therefore, early detection is necessary to reduce the risk of amputation (Jalilian et al., 2020). Occurrences of PAD, such as lower limb infections, diabetic foot ulcers, peripheral artery disease, and gangrene, are the most common medical conditions that cause amputation (Davidson et al., 2023). More than 85 percent of people with diabetes require lower limb amputation because of diabetic foot ulcers that are generally difficult to cure (Serban et al., 2021).

Although not all diabetics are at risk of developing foot ulcers, it is still important for people with diabetes who have risk factors to take precautions (van Netten et al., 2024). To avoid complications of diabetes, effective DM management is essential (Tanamas et al., 2025). The main concepts of diabetes self-management include dietary adherence, physical activity, blood glucose monitoring, medication adherence, and risk-reduction behaviors (Molla et al., 2025). Poor foot care management can lead to cuts, infections, or decreased physiological function of the foot, leading to various complications (Sirait et al., 2024). To reduce the risk of diabetic foot ulcers, diabetics should adhere to a diabetes treatment program consisting of doctor therapy, diet, and exercise. However, medication compliance in diabetes sufferers is still not optimal, so DM sufferers need to be given DSME (Jalilian et al., 2020). DSME has been shown to improve health promotion to prevent diabetic foot ulcers (Kartika et al., 2021).

Education is important for people with DM. Education in DM patients can prevent complications of diabetic foot ulcers, improving Quality of Life (Ghasemi et al., 2021), increases dietary or nutritional adherence (Medhat et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2022), increase knowledge (Sarmadikia et al., 2022), as well as increasing compliance in activities (Medhat et al., 2020). Certified diabetes nurses and certified diabetes educators can play an important role in teaching people with diabetes about reducing their risk of diabetic foot disease (Abdelaziz et al., 2022). A team consisting of an endocrinologist or diabetes specialist, a physician trained to care for people with diabetes, a diabetes specialist nurse or diabetes educator, and a dietitian should provide education (Olinder et al., 2022). The novelty of this research is to carry out a DSME approach with four pillars of diabetes management, namely nutrition/nutrition, physical activity, treatment, and education to prevent diabetic foot ulcers effectively. However, evidence on the direct impact of DSME on PAD parameters remains limited. This study aims to analyze the effect of DSME on the control of PAD in Type 2 Diabetes.

METHODOLOGY

Study Design

This quasi-experimental research was conducted in Pucang Sawit and Gajahan Community Health Centers Surakarta, Indonesia, from August to November 2024. The intervention group received treatment through the Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) method, which included material on diet, physical activity, and medication. The DSME applied in this study is a behavioral nursing intervention that aims to empower patients to improve their health status. The control group received a book compiled by the researchers as a self-management guide to improve adherence to diet, physical activity, and medication.

Samples/Participants

The study involved two groups of people diagnosed with type 2 DM. The intervention group had 40 respondents, while the control group had 39 respondents. Cluster random sampling was used initially to select study areas, followed by simple random sampling to recruit participants, and simple random sampling is used in the second stage to take samples from a predetermined population. Respondents met the inclusion criteria: they were registered as type 2 diabetics at the Health Center, had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for at least two years, did not have diabetic foot ulcers, and were willing to be respondents. However, people with type 2 DM with complications who are unable to communicate are criteria that are not included in this study.

Data Collection

In this study, the measurement used was the Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) method, which consisted of three instruments: DM diet, physical activity, and medication (Lai et al., 2024). The research instrument has been tested for validity and reliability with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.975. Noninvasive tests to detect PAD include the ankle-brachial index (ABI) test and the plantar sensitivity test, which is assessed using 10g of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (Cerqueira et al., 2024). ABI and foot sensitivity examinations were performed in both groups before and after the intervention to identify PAD.

Data Analysis

Data analysis was carried out to examine the differences in respondent characteristics, ABI values, and foot sensitivity before and after the intervention. Categorical variables can be described by frequency and percentage, continuous variables can be described by mean and standard deviation. The Mann– Whitney U test and independent t-test were used to test differences between continuous data. In contrast, the chi-square test was used to examine differences in categorical variables with a significance level of p < 0.05.

Ethical Consideration

This research received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Commission, Universitas Aisyiyah Surakarta, Indonesia with reference number 198/VII/AUEC/2024 on 4th July, 2024.

RESULTS

Table 1: Distribution of Respondent Characteristics of the Intervention and Control Groups


Variable

Intervention Groups (n = 40)

Control Groups (n = 39)

p

Gender

Female

24 (60%)

28 (71.79%)

0.206

Male

16 (40%)

11 (28.2%)

Employment Status

Working

17 (42.5%)

15 (34.46%)

1.000

Not working

23 (57.5%)

24 (61.54%)

Education Level

Higher education

5 (12.5%)

2 (5.13%)

0.014*

Secondary education

20 (50%)

10 (25.64%)

Primary education

15 (37.5%)

27 (69.23%)

Smoking History

Do not smoke

33 (82.5%)

35 (89.7%)

0.866

Smoke

7 (17.5%)

4 (10,3%)

Age

62.55 (9.25%)

60.67 (8.95%)

0.361

Duration of Diabetes

7.43 (7.56%)

5.49 (7.02%)

0.242

*Significant at p < 0.05 when comparing intervention and control groups

Analysis results Table 1 showed no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of gender (p=0.206), occupation (p=1.000), smoking history (p=0.866), age (p=0.361), and duration of illness (p=0.242). However, there were differences between the two groups in terms of education level (p=0.014).

Table 2: Differences in ABI and Pre and Post-intervention Sensitivity in the Intervention and Control Groups


Variable

N

Pre-intervention

Post-intervention

Mean (SD)

p

Mean (SD)

p

ABI

Intervention groups

40

1.15 (0.21)

0.001*

0.99 (0.20)

<0.001*

Control groups

39

0.98 (0.20)

1.16 (0.21)

Sensitivity

Intervention groups

40

7.48 (3.84)

0.495

9.74 (0.59)

0.001*

Control groups

39

6.92 (3.94)

8.36 (1.98)

*Significant at p < 0.05 when comparing intervention and control groups

Based on Table 2, there was no significant difference in the initial foot sensitivity values (p=0.495), but there was a difference in the ABI (p=0.001). The ABI values (p<0.001) and foot sensitivity (p=0.001) after the intervention showed significant differences. The post-intervention measurement results showed that the average ABI in the intervention group (0.99) was lower than in the control group (1.16). These results indicate a decrease in the ABI value in the intervention group. Meanwhile, the average foot sensitivity value in the intervention group (9.74) was higher than that in the control group (8.36), indicating an increase in foot sensitivity in the intervention group.

DISCUSSION

Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) is an educational method that nurses can implement to improve the knowledge and self-management skills of people with diabetes. The education level influences the success of DSME. This study showed a difference in education level between the intervention and control groups, which could influence DSME outcomes. The majority of respondents in this study had a high school education. Diabetes patients with lower education levels had poorer glycemic control and a lower risk of death (Liao et al., 2023). Therefore, various behavioral, psychosocial, and psychological interventions are needed, along with empowering, didactic, interactive, and collaborative educational methods (Camargo-Plazas et al., 2023) to increase understanding and improve self-care skills.

DSME conducted by nurses in carrying out their roles as educators and facilitators has proven effective in improving knowledge (Harahap et al., 2025) and glycemic control behaviors of diabetes patients (Sun et al., 2025; Osei et al., 2025). Better knowledge can help diabetes patients manage diet, medication, activity, and stress (Kusnanto et al., 2020). Therefore, to improve the quality of life for patients with diabetes, education is necessary (Medhat et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2022). The main goal of education for patients with diabetes is to achieve metabolic control, preventing complications from developing. To optimize metabolic control, a multidisciplinary approach is needed that combines diet, physical activity, and therapy or medication (Acosta et al., 2025; Sarmadikia et al., 2022).

DSME is a process that facilitates the development of knowledge, attitudes, and self-management skills (Ernawati et al., 2021) to control PAD, as evidenced by foot sensitivity measurements. Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that requires lifelong lifestyle interventions and pharmacological therapy (Bekele et al., 2020). Consequently, individuals with diabetes must make numerous self-management decisions and engage in complex daily care activities (Bakara & Kurniyati, 2022). DSME can influence daily care behaviors in people with diabetes (Lai et al., 2024). Education, meal planning, lifestyle changes, physical activity, and healthy habits are key components of diabetes mellitus (DM) management. DSME helps people with diabetes make lifestyle changes and improve their health outcomes.

DSME can improve a person's ability to live a healthy life with diabetes and reduce the risk of diabetes- related complications (Olson et al., 2022). Lifestyle changes such as regular exercise, weight management, and adopting a healthy diet can improve peripheral perfusion and lower blood sugar levels, thereby preventing diabetes complications (Hartanto et al., 2025). Therefore, dietary education programs appear crucial for preventing and reducing the complications of type 2 diabetes (Sarmadikia et al., 2022).

Nurses play a key role in educating diabetes patients about self-management within the healthcare system (Zhuang & Bo, 2025). This reinforces the importance of DSME for the ongoing care of people with diabetes (Camargo-Plazas et al., 2023). Lifestyle and dietary changes can improve outcomes for patients with diabetes. Adherence to a diet is the first step in managing diabetes. However, dietary changes and adherence to dietary recommendations are the most difficult parts of diabetes management (Molavynejad et al., 2022).

DSME can improve foot care behavior and awareness by assessing foot conditions, helping patients avoid DM-related foot problems. One way to perform a foot examination is to check foot sensitivity and the Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) (Frisca, 2021). An increase or decrease in the ABI can lead to complications in people with type 2 diabetes. Type 2 DM patients with high ABI values are at higher risk of developing foot ulcers and neuropathy compared to DM patients with normal ABI values (Sartore et al., 2023). However, the DSME program needs to be implemented continuously for at least 1 year to be effective in improving glycemic control (Lai et al., 2024) and, thus, ABI values.

DSME addresses all the elements of clinical, educational, psychosocial, and behavioral care necessary for day-to-day self-management and provides a foundation to help all people with diabetes go through daily care confidently and with better outcomes (Powers et al., 2020). So that DMSE can increase compliance in diabetics, one of which is by exercising regularly. Exercise is an important part of the lifestyle of diabetics. Exercise can increase vasodilation and tissue blood flow (Tran & Haley, 2021). Exercise can also improve myelin and axon nerve function and improve nerve conduction and sensitivity, thereby reducing peripheral sensory neuropathy. In addition, exercise also plays an important role in improving the sensory sensitivity of the feet, improving blood circulation, reducing neuropathy, and lowering blood glucose levels in patients with diabetes mellitus (Sirait et al., 2024).

Limitations

Limitations of this study include its focus on education about medication, diet, and activity, as well as differences in educational background, which may influence the study's findings.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the importance of structured DSME in managing PAD in patients with diabetes, encouraging nurses and other healthcare professionals to enhance their role in educating patients with diabetes. DSME can control PAD by improving foot sensitivity, but three months is not enough time to improve ABI values. The study also suggests that DSME can improve patients' self-care skills, thereby helping them better manage and detect PAD risk. Given the limitations of this study, including the small sample size and the 3-month DSME implementation period, these results should be considered preliminary. Future studies should include larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to yield more accurate results. Researchers are also encouraged to explore multiple methods for aggregating PAD.

Recommendation

This study demonstrates that Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) can be implemented for all people with diabetes. DSME should also be implemented over a longer period. The use of digital tools for continuing education programs can also complement the material provided to people with diabetes.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article have been reported.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to thank the Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia, for funding this research under contract number 065/PN/VI/2024. They also express their gratitude to all parties who participated in this research.

REFERENCES

Abdelaziz, S. H., Abdo, O. I., & Abdellatif, S. K. (2022). Association between nutritional habits and glycosylated hemoglobin level in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Malaysian Journal of Nursing, 14(2), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.31674/mjn.2022.v14i02.002

Acosta, S., Du, Y., Borné, Y., & Gottsäter, A. (2025). Differences in risk factor profiles for peripheral artery disease compared to coronary, cerebral and carotid artery. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 3864. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88516-0

Bakara, D. M., & Kurniyati (2022). Self-Management education to control blood sugar levels and hba1c value for type 2 diabetes patients. Malaysian Journal of Nursing, 14(1), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.31674/mjn.2022.v14i01.012

Bekele, H., Asefa, A., Getachew, B., & Belete, A. M. (2020). Barriers and strategies to lifestyle and dietary pattern interventions for prevention and management of TYPE‐2 diabetes in Africa, systematic review. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2020(1), 7948712. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7948712

Camargo-Plazas, P., Robertson, M., Alvarado, B., Paré, G. C., Costa, I. G., & Duhn, L. (2023). Diabetes self-management education (DSME) for older persons in Western countries: A scoping review. PloS One, 18(8), e0288797. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288797

Cerqueira, M. M. B. da F., Bastos, N. S. S. G., Silva, D. A. R. da, Gregori, D., Magalhães, L. B. N. C., & Pimentel, M. M. W. (2024). Accuracy of ankle-brachial index in screening for peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes. PloS One, 19(10), e0309083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309083

Davidson, J. A., Sukor, N., Hew, F. L., Mohamed, M., & Hussein, Z. (2023). Safety of sodium–glucose c otransporter 2 inhibitors in Asian type 2 diabetes populations. Journal of Diabetes Investigation, 14(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13915

Duncan, B. B., Magliano, D. J., & Boyko, E. J. (2025). IDF Diabetes Atlas 11th edition 2025 : Global prevalence and projections for 2050. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 0(August), 1–3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf177

Ernawati, U., Wihastuti, T. A., & Utami, Y. W. (2021). Effectiveness of diabetes self-management education (Dsme) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (t2dm) patients: Systematic literature review. Journal of Public Health Research, 10(2), 404–408. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2021.2240

Frisca, S. (2021). Effectiveness Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) to foot care behaviour and foot condition in diabetes mellitus patient. KnE Life Sciences, 2021, 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v6i1.8783

Ghasemi, F., Vakilian, K., & Khalajinia, Z. (2021). Comparing the effect of individual counseling with counseling on social application on self-care and quality of life of women with gestational diabetes. Primary Care Diabetes, 15(5), 842–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2021.05.009

Harahap, E. Y., Muhith, A., Asih, A. Y. P., & Hasina, S. N. (2025). The effect of video-based Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) telenursing on level of knowledge in diabetes mellitus patients. Journal of Nursing Practice, 9(1), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.30994/jnp.v9il.652

Hartanto, A. E., Widyaningrum, R. A., Budiono, B., Hendrawati, G. W., & Purwaningsih, Y. (2025). Nursing care on type 2 diabetes mellitus with the risk of ineffective peripheral perfusion: A case study. Holistic Journal of Nursing Studies, 1(2), 8-15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.xxxxx/hjns29

Jalilian, M., Ahmadi Sarbarzeh, P., & Oubari, S. (2020). Factors related to severity of diabetic foot ulcer: A systematic review. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity, 1835-1842. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S256243

Kusnanto, K., Arifin, H., & Widyawati, I. Y. (2020). A qualitative study exploring diabetes resilience among adults with regulated type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 14(6), 1681-1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.08.035

Lai, Y. C., Chen, Y. S., Jiang, Y. D., Wang, C. S., Wang, I. C., Huang, H. F., ... & Chuang, L. M. (2024). Diabetes self-management education on the sustainability of metabolic control in type 2 diabetes patients: Diabetes share care program in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 123(2), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2023.09.010

Lee, S. Y., Renner, S., Kovacic, M. B., & Lee, R. (2022). Food literacy education during nutrition counseling for patients with diabetes: In-depth interviews with registered dietitians/registered dietitians nutritionists. Current Developments in Nutrition, 6, 848. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac065.032

Liao, Y. S., Tsai, W. C., Chiu, L. T., & Kung, P. T. (2023). Educational attainment affects the diagnostic time in type 2 diabetes mellitus and the mortality risk of those enrolled in the diabetes pay-for- performance program. Health Policy, 138, 104917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104917

Medhat, M., Sabry, N., & Ashoush, N. (2020). Knowledge, attitude and practice of community pharmacists towards nutrition counseling. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 42(6), 1456- 1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01106-0

Molavynejad, S., Miladinia, M., & Jahangiri, M. (2022). A randomized trial of comparing video telecare education vs. in-person education on dietary regimen compliance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A support for clinical telehealth Providers. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 22(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-01032-4

Molla, I. B., Hagger, V., Rothmann, M. J., & Rasmussen, B. (2025). The Role of Community Organisation, Religion, Spirituality and Cultural Beliefs on Diabetes Social Support and Self- Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: Integrative Literature Review. Journal of Religion and Health, 64(4), 2407-2464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02233-y

Niu, Y. L., Zhang, Y., Song, Z. Y., Zhao, C. Z., Luo, Y., Wang, Y., & Yuan, J. (2024). Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 53(2), 313– 322. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i2.14916

Olinder, L. A., DeAbreu, M., Greene, S., Haugstvedt, A., Lange, K., Majaliwa, E. S., Pais, V., Pelicand, J., Town, M., & Mahmud, F. H. (2022). ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2022: Diabetes education in children and adolescents. Pediatric Diabetes, 23(8), 1229–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.13418

Olson, J. L., White, B., Mitchell, H., Halliday, J., Skinner, T., Schofield, D., ... & Watson, N. (2022). The design of an evaluation framework for diabetes self-management education and support programs delivered nationally. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021- 07374-4

Osei, E. P., Ekpor, E., Akyirem, S., Asante, A., & Romadlon, D. S. (2025). Effectiveness of diabetes self-management education interventions on glycemic control in persons with diabetes in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 87(7), 4476-4483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.00000000003420

Peimani, M., Esfahani, Z., Bandarian, F., Esmaeili, S., Moghaddam, S. S., Namazi, N., ... & Larijani, B. (2024). The burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus and attributable risk factors in Iran, 1990–2019: Results from the global burden of disease study 2019. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 53(4), 913. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i4.15569

Perks, J., Zaccardi, F., Rayt, H., Sayers, R., Brady, E. M., Davies, M. J., ... & Hall, A. (2023). Device- measured physical activity behaviours, and physical function, in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral artery disease: A cross-sectional study. Experimental Gerontology, 178, 112207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2023.112207

Powers, M. A., Bardsley, J. K., Cypress, M., Funnell, M. M., Harms, D., Hess-Fischl, A., ... & Uelmen, S. (2020). Diabetes self-management education and support in adults with type 2 diabetes: A consensus report of the american diabetes association, the association of diabetes care & education specialists, the academy of nutrition and dietetics, the american academy of family physicians, the american academy of pas, the american association of nurse practitioners, and the american pharmacists association. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 60(6), e1 - e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2020.04.018

Rodrigues, B. T., Vangaveti, V. N., Urkude, R., Biros, E., & Malabu, U. H. (2022). Prevalence and risk factors of lower limb amputations in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 16(2), 102397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102397

Sarmadikia, M., Mazandarani, A., Faramarzi, E., & Ehsani, A. (2022). The effect of dietary counseling and medical nutrition therapy on HbA1c levels in patients with diabetes in Imam Reza hospital of Tabriz, Iran. Journal of Nutrition, Fasting & Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017

Sartore, G., Caprino, R., Ragazzi, E., Bianchi, L., Lapolla, A., & Piarulli, F. (2023). The ankle-brachial index for assessing the prevalence of peripheral artery disease and cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 33(3), 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2022.11.019

Serban, D., Papanas, N., Dascalu, A. M., Stana, D., Nicolae, V. A., Vancea, G., ... & Pantea-Stoian, A. (2021). Diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: A systematic review. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 20(2), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734620982237

Sirait, H. S., Said, F., & Mohamad, N. (2024). Successful aspects and impacts of diabetic foot exercise among Indonesian type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A literature review. International Journal of Advancement in Life Sciences Research, 7(2), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.31632/ijalsr.2024.v07i02.002

Staniszewska, A., Jones, A., Rudd, S., de Vocht, F., & Hinchliffe, R. (2024). Effectiveness of screening for foot complications in people with diabetes–A systematic review. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, 38(11), 108865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108865

Sun, J., Fan, Z., Kou, M., Wang, X., Yue, Z., & Zhang, M. (2025). Impact of nurse-led self-management education on type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1622988. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1622988

Tanamas, N. S., Jusuf, H., & Liputo, G. P. (2025). DSME to improve self-care and self-efficacy in type 2 diabetes: A quasi-experimental study. Journal Syifa Sciences and Clinical Research, 7(2), 188-196. https://doi.org/10.37311/jsscr.v7i2.31122

Tran, M. M., & Haley, M. N. (2021). Does exercise improve healing of diabetic foot ulcers? A systematic review. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 14(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021- 00456-w

van Netten, J. J., Raspovic, A., Lavery, L. A., Monteiro‐Soares, M., Paton, J., Rasmussen, A., ... & Bus, S. A. (2024). Prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes at risk of ulceration: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 40(3), e3652. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3652

Kartika, A. W,, Widyatuti, W., & Rekawati, E. (2021). The effectiveness of home-based nursing intervention in the elderly with recurrent diabetic foot ulcers: A case report. Journal of Public Health Research, 10(2), 2162. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2021.2162

Zhuang, Z., & Bo, Y. (2025). Self-management and role of nurses of diabetic patients: A critical narrative literature review during COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Medicine, 12, 1626447. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1626447

Zúnica-García, S., Blanquer-Gregori, J. F. J., Sánchez-Ortiga, R., Chicharro-Luna, E., & Jiménez- Trujillo, M. I. (2024). Association between mediterranean diet adherence and peripheral artery disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: An observational study. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, 38(11), 108871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108871