Burnout among Nurses in Critical Care Units: Addressing a Persistent Challenge


Sahar Yaqoob Yousif*, Sadeq Al-Fayyadh


1Adult Nursing Department, College of Nursing, University of Babylon, 51001 Hillah, Babylon Governorate, Iraq


2Adult Nursing Department, College of Nursing, University of Baghdad, 10047 Baghdad Governorate, Baghdad, Iraq


*Corresponding Author’s Email: sahar.hamza2202m@conursing.uobaghdad.edu.iq

ABSTRACT

Background: Burnout is a highly prevalent occupational disease among nurses, especially those working in complex critical care settings. Objective: To determine the level of burnout among nurses practicing in critical care units. Methods: This study employed a descriptive cross-sectional design, involving 377 nurses working in critical care units across 13 hospitals in Iraq. Data were collected using sociodemographic, professional characteristics of the nursing competency and performance, and the Burnout Assessment Tool. The data was analysed using descriptive statistics. Results: The study showed a high prevalence of overall burnout among nurses, with a mean score of 2.53. The study also revealed medium levels of mental detachment, cognitive impairment, emotional impairment, and psychological distress, with mean scores of 2.18, 1.85, 2.17, and 2.71, respectively. The exhaustion and psychosomatic complaints scored highly, with mean scores of 3.07 and 2.87, respectively. Conclusion: Nurses in critical care units experienced a high level of burnout. Within the dimensions of burnout, high levels of exhaustion and psychosomatic complaints were found, as were medium levels for each of the dimensions of mental distance, cognitive impairment, emotional impairment, and psychological distress.


Keywords: Burnout; Nurses; Intensive Care Units


INTRODUCTION


A Critical care nurses provide immediate care for critically ill or injured patients (Terry & Weaver, 2011). Critical care nurses are the primary health care providers who are in charge of providing efficient direct care to patients, monitoring them 24 hours a day (Lewandowska et al., 2020). Nevertheless, nurses consistently encounter double burdens when practicing their complex and multifaceted responsibilities (Shah et al., 2021). Carrying out these multifaceted responsibilities might expose them to numerous occupational risks, such as hospital-acquired infections, physical aggression, compassion fatigue, stress, anxiety, depression disorder, moral distress, problems with sleep, risk of disease, and most importantly, burnout (Schwarz & Bouckenooghe, 2021; Kowalczuk, Krajewska-Kulak & Sobolewski, 2020 ; Al-Rjoub, Diener & Sadeq, 2022; Dadoosh & Sadeq, 2022; Jabar & Jasim, 2021; Mohammed & Bakey, 2021; Rajih, 2020; Kadhim & Qassem, 2023; Hamad & Qassim, 2019; Woo et al., 2020). According to Konstantinou et al. (2018), prolonged unresolved job-related stress and unsuccessful coping mechanisms lead to burnout, a mental condition characterised by physical and psychological exhaustion.


Burnout remains a widespread issue within numerous healthcare professions, but especially in nursing. This is primarily because routine nursing responsibilities require nurses to engage in strong personal interactions with patients (de Looff et al., 2018). Nurses, as a society, are vulnerable to burnout due to many reasons, including a challenging working environment (Alkhawaldeh et al., 2020). Insufficient autonomy (Abdulnabi & AL-Fayyadh, 2021). People often encounter aggressive actions (Shafran et al., 2024). Moreover, many workloads cause burnout (Alzahrani, Alanazi & Almutairi, 2024).


In recent years, the incidence of burnout syndrome has increased (Kyei & Takyi, 2024). This adverse outcome could be due to the highly demanding, competitive, and hostile work environments of intensive care units (ICU), which are extremely stressful for nurses, patients, and families (Clark et al., 2016). Critical care units are specialised healthcare settings in which healthcare providers, particularly nurses, provide 24-hour care and life support (Saravanabavan, Sivakumar & Hisham, 2019). Stressful work environments involving emergency care, high morbidity and mortality, moral dilemmas, and painful physical care procedures place nurses at risk for physical and emotional exhaustion that can result in burnout syndrome (Singh, 2022; Preetam, 2023). In addition, research has indicated that an inadequate staffing ratio of more than 1:2 might elevate the risk of developing burnout among critical care unit nurses (Bruyneel et al., 2021). For example, one study explained the relationship between high rates of nursing burnout and a suboptimal employment ratio. They found in their study that the nurse-patient ratio is 1:3 or higher, which confirms that the nurse-patient ratio is one of the main factors contributing to burnout (Torre, Popper & Bergesio, 2019). International studies have reported a wide range of burnout incidence among critical care nurses, from 0%- 80% (Browning, 2019; Cishahayo et al., 2017). Previous studies conducted in India have shown a wide range of prevalence rates for burnout among critical care nurses, ranging from 2%-69% (See et al., 2018; Kumar et al., 2021).


The 11th revision of the International Classification of Disease recognizes and includes burnout as an occupational phenomenon (WHO, 2019). Burnout remains a significant occupational hazard for nursing staff in many Middle Eastern countries, including both Arabic and non- Arabic countries such as Jordan and Iraq, as well as around the world (Khatatbeh et al., 2022; Mudallal, Othman & Al Hassan, 2017; Mansour & Hussien, 2020). The current study is particularly important in the demanding field of critical care units, primarily due to the scarcity of research on burnout among nurses working in these units in Iraq. This study utilises a new burnout assessment tool to examine burnout among critical care unit nurses. As a result, the aim of this study was to provide an answer to the research question. What level of burnout exists among nurses practicing in critical care units?


METHODOLOGY

Study Design

A descriptive cross-sectional design was utilised in the present research. Descriptive cross- sectional studies are valuable for providing insight into phenomena at a single point in time without the need for long-term follow-up. The researchers commit to preserving the confidentiality of participants' personal information and ensuring that the data collected is utilised in a manner that does not result in any actual or potential harm to the participants involved in the study. After obtaining the formal agreement from the hospitals, participants were given the voluntary right to participate in the study through the signing of a consent form and were told that their involvement was voluntary and that the gathered information would be handled privately and used only for scientific research. The researchers have successfully completed the Human Research Protection Foundation Training for the Office of Human Research Protection (OHRP).

Study Settings

A total of 377 nurses working in the Critical Care Units (Cardiac Care Units and Respiratory Care Units) in 13 teaching hospitals across Iraq were selected utilising the technique of purposive sampling. A self-reported questionnaire was utilised to collect data from January 4 to March 7, 2024. Filling out the questionnaire took nearly 15 to 20 minutes.


Raosoft sample size calculators determined the minimum sample size to be 377 participants with an 89% response rate (confidence level = 0.95, margin error = 0.05). Inclusion criteria included: female and male nurses who consented to participate in the study; nurses employed in the morning, evening, and night shifts; and recently employed nursing staff. The study excluded nurses who refused to participate and those who did not complete the questionnaires.


Instrument

Table 1 fully describes the first section of the research questionnaire, which focusses on the sociodemographic characteristics of nurses. The second section involved the professional characteristics of nurses, as described in Table 2.


The third section includes the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). Schaufeli, Desart and De Witte (2020) were the scientists who developed the English version of the BAT. The BAT comprises 33 items, which involve the Burnout Assessment Tool Core Symptoms (BAT-C) and Burnout Assessment Tool Secondary Symptoms (BAT-S). The BAT-C assesses four core dimensions. The first dimension is exhaustion; the second dimension is mental distance; the third dimension is emotional impairment; the fourth dimension is cognitive impairment; and it consists of 23 items. Whereas the BAT-S evaluates two secondary dimensions, the first dimension is psychological distress, and the second dimension is psychosomatic complaints, which contains 10 items.


Both are rated using a Likert scale, comprising five points ranging from 1 to 5. 1 signifies (never), 2 signifies (rarely), 3 signifies (sometimes), 4 signifies (often), and 5 signifies (always). The English version of the Burnout Assessment Tool was obtained from the corresponding author. Permission was obtained from the corresponding author to assess the psychometric properties of the Burnout Assessment Tool when translated into Arabic. A back- to-back translation method was implemented to authenticate the English version. Certified bilingual specialists, who specialize in both professional nursing and translation from English to Arabic, originally translated the Burnout Assessment Tool from English.


The validity and reliability of the Burnout Assessment Tool were tested following its translation into Arabic. The Burnout Assessment Tool in Arabic demonstrates an excellent content validity level of 0.97, indicating that it accurately measures the intended outcomes (Yusoff, 2019). In a pilot study with 38 nurses, the researcher assessed the reliability and found that the nurses clearly understood each item of the Burnout Assessment Tool. Similarly, during pilot study, the researcher did not clarify any items with Cronbach's alpha (0.91). Next, the researcher tested the reliability with 377 nurses, achieving a Cronbach's alpha score of 0.926. The survey used the assessment tool of Cronbach's alpha, a statistical measure, to evaluate the reliability or internal consistency. It indicates the degree to which a set of items in a test measure the same underlying concept or construct.

Data Analysis

Version 24 of the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was utilised for the data analysis. Descriptive statistics (frequency, mean, and standard deviation) were used to analyse the sociodemographic data, professional characteristics, and burnout level.


Ethical Consideration

The present study obtained ethical approval from the Committee of Scientific Research (CSR) of the College of Nursing, University of Baghdad, Iraq with reference number 43 on 16th November, 2023, and from the Ministry of Planning (Central Statistical Organization) Iraq with reference number 10475 on 17th December 2023.

RESULTS


Table 1: Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Participants’ (N = 377)


Variable

Frequency

Percent

Age (Years)

21-28

240

63.7

29-36

88

23.3

37-44

26

6.9

45-52

15

4.0

53-60

8

2.1

Average (SD): 29.14 ± 7.34

Sex

Male

159

42.2

Female

218

57.8

Marital Status

Single

173

45.9

Married

198

52.5

Divorced

4

1.1

Widow/Widower

2

0.5

Educational Qualification

Nursing high school

59

15.6

Associate degree

153

40.6

Bachelor's degree

156

41.4

Postgraduate diploma

3

0.8

Master's degree

6

1.6

Residency

Rural

32

8.5

Urban

345

91.5

SD: Standard Deviation


With an average age of 29.14±7.34, the predominance of participants was between 21 and 28 years old (n = 240; 63.7%); the majority were females (n = 218; 57.8%) compared to males (n = 159; 42.2%); and over half reported being married (n = 198; 52.5%). In terms of educational qualification, more than two-fifths hold bachelor’s degrees (n = 156; 41.4%), and a significant majority of respondents reported that they have lived in urban areas (n = 345; 91.5%) compared to individuals who lived in rural areas (n = 32; 8.5%) (Table 1).

Table 2: Participants’ Professional Characteristics (N = 377)


Variable

Frequency

Percent

Current Unit

Cardiac Care Unit for male Patients

13

3.4

Cardiac Care Unit for female Patients

6

1.6

Cardiac Care Unit for male and female Patients

114

30.2

Intensive Care Unit for male Patients

4

1.1

Intensive Care Unit for female Patients

6

1.6

Intensive Care Unit for male and female Patient

234

62.1

Work Shift

Morning shift

185

49.1

Evening shift (2:30 p.m. – 8:30 a.m.)

183

48.5

Night shift (8:30 p.m. – 8:30 a.m.)

9

2.4

Nurse to Bed Ratio

3:1

49

13.0

2:1

62

16.4

1:1

111

29.4

1:2

49

13.0

1:3

49

13.0

1:4 or more

57

15.1

Receiving Psychological Counselling

Yes

88

23.3

No

289

76.7

Having Second Job

Yes

113

30.0

No

264

70.0

Years of working: Average (SD): 6.168 ± 6.74

Years of experience in the current unit: Average (SD): 4.01 ± 4.5

Time span: Average (SD): 11.81 ± 5.90


In terms of the current unit in which nurses work, most nurses work in the critical care unit for male and female patients (n = 234; 62.1%); less than half of staff work in the morning shift (n = 185; 49.1%); and regarding nurse-to-bed ratio, the majority reported that nurse-to-bed ratio is 1:1 for less than a third (n = 111; 29.4%). Regarding receiving psychological counselling, the majority reported that they did not receive such counselling (n = 289; 76.7%) in comparison to those who reported that they did (n = 88; 23.3%); the preponderance of participants reported that they do not have a second job (n = 264; 70.0%); and the average of years of working is6.168 ± 6.74; the average of years of experience in the current unit is 4.01 ± 4.5; and the average of time span is 11.81 ± 5.90 (Table 2).

Table 3: Levels of Burnout (N = 377)


Sub-Scales

Average

SD

Assessment

Exhaustion

At work, I feel mentally exhausted.

2.52

1.17

Medium

Everything I do at work requires a great deal of effort.

3.87

1.17

Very High

After a day at work, I find it hard to recover my energy.

3.48

1.27

High

At work, I feel physically exhausted.

3.45

1.23

High

When I get up in the morning, I lack the energy to start a new day at work.

3.14

1.36

High

I want to be active at work, but somehow, I am unable to manage.

2.55

1.31

Medium

When I exert myself at work, I quickly get tired.

2.36

1.23

Medium

At the end of my working day, I feel mentally exhausted and drained.

3.18

1.34

High

Overall Assessment

3.07

0.90

High

Mental Distance

I struggle to find any enthusiasm for my work.

3.47

1.42

High

At work, I do not think much about what I am doing, and I function on autopilot.

2.47

1.39

High

I feel a strong aversion towards my job.

1.92

1.22

Medium

I feel indifferent about my job.

1.39

0.86

Medium

I’m cynical about what my work means to others.

1.66

1.16

Medium

Overall Assessment

2.18

0.78

Medium

Cognitive Impairment

At work, I have trouble staying focused.

2.00

1.09

Medium

At work I struggle to think clearly.

2.06

1.09

Medium

I’m forgetful and distracted at work.

1.87

1.11

Medium

When I’m working, I have trouble concentrating.

1.84

1.04

Medium

I make mistakes in my work because I have my mind on other things.

1.49

0.87

Low

Overall Assessment

1.85

0.84

Medium

Emotional Impairment

At work, I feel unable to control my emotions.

2.03

1.17

Medium

I do not recognize myself in the way I react emotionally at work.

2.02

1.07

Medium

During my work I become irritable when things don’t go my way.

2.55

1.31

High

I get upset or sad at work without knowing why.

2.19

1.17

Medium

At work I may overreact unintentionally.

2.05

1.15

Medium

Overall Assessment

2.17

0.86

Medium

Psychological Distress

I have trouble falling or staying asleep.

2.89

1.47

High

I tend to worry.

2.49

1.31

Medium

I feel tense and stressed.

2.49

1.37

Medium

I feel anxious and/or suffer from panic attacks.

2.06

1.27

Medium

Noise and crowds disturb me.

3.63

1.36

Very High

Overall Assessment

2.71

1.04

Medium

Psychosomatic Complaints

I suffer from palpitations or chest pain.

2.15

1.23

Medium

I suffer from stomach and/or intestinal complaints.

2.45

1.34

Medium

I suffer from headaches.

3.23

1.29

High

I suffer from muscle pain, for example in the neck, shoulder or back.

3.53

1.31

Very High

I often get sick.

3.00

1.14

High

Overall Assessment

2.87

0.93

High

Burnout

Overall Assessment

2.53

0.67

High

SD: Standard Deviation; Scoring based on Statistical norms for Flemish employees (BAT-23)

The study outcomes showed that nurses experienced a high level of exhaustion with an average score of 3.07, a medium level of mental distance with an average score of 2.18, a medium level of cognitive impairment with an average score equal to 1.85, a medium level of emotional impairment with an average score equal to 2.17, a medium level of psychological distress with an average score equal to 2.71, a high level of psychosomatic complaints with an average score equal to 2.87, and an overall assessment of burnout from the nurses with an average score equal to 2.53 (Table 3).

The study revealed that critical care nurses, often younger and at the beginning of their careers, face significant challenges such as managing complex patients, adapting to high-demand environments, and developing new skills, all contributing to burnout. Female nurses experience additional pressure due to balancing family and work responsibilities, while married nurses face a double burden that exacerbates stress. Urban living, high expectations from holding bachelor's degrees, and irregular shifts also contribute to burnout.


DISCUSSION


Health care staff, as well as patients and their families, widely recognise the critical care unit environment as a source of tension (Saravanabavan, Sivakumar & Hisham, 2019). The central goal of this study was to approach critical care nurses from both Respiratory and Cardiac Care Units to evaluate the prevalence of burnout syndrome. This study is considered unique because it uses a new tool to evaluate burnout among nurses. The primary results of this study, as illustrated in Table 3, showed that the mean score of the overall burnout assessment is 2.53, which indicates a high level of burnout among nurses with a high level of exhaustion. This outcome was corroborated by a study done by Meneguin et al. (2023) that investigated the correlation among burnout and professional quality of life among 109 critical care unit nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. In their study, they found a higher medium score of exhaustion (3.13) than disengagement (2.43); however, both scores showed a high level of burnout among nurses. These findings were not surprising to the researchers, since nurses in critical care units are responsible for caring for patients with life-threatening conditions throughout their shift, so they become easily exhausted and fatigued as a result of prolonged work hours and heavy workloads, making it difficult for them to begin a new workday with energy and vigour, which ultimately contributes to burnout among nurses (Ashipala & Nghole, 2022).


Equally significant, the present study found a moderate level of mental distance among nurses, as shown in Table 3. The results of this study contradict the study by Barnard et al. (2023), which examined burnout among 204 emergency nurses in South Africa and assessed the role of job demand resources and work abilities on burnout level. They found in their study that the mean mental distance score was 2.74, indicating that emergency nurses have a high level of mental distance. Both findings highlighted that upon starting their careers in critical care units, nurses are initially excited and motivated, but when the work environment fails to be supportive of the nurse’s effort and concern for the reality of the job, their expectations start to deviate, leading to increased frustration and disappointment, job dissatisfaction, reduced productivity, a loss of confidence and enthusiasm, and an increased probability of developing mental distance and burnout (Nantsupawat et al., 2017).

Likewise, impotantly, the current study also found that the mean score of cognitive impairment is 1.85, indicating a medium level, as shown in Table 3. This contradicts the findings of Palvimo, Vauhkonen and Hult (2023), which examined the association among destructive leadership, job demands, resources, and burnout. The study revealed a mean score of 2.60 for cognitive impairment, indicating a high level of cognitive impairment among Finnish nurses. The researchers were not surprised because nurses routinely work in a stressful environment characterised by a high workload and long working hours, and they may face the need to make quick decisions under pressure on a regular basis, touching on aspects of life and death. All these elements contribute to cognitive impairment, leading to difficulties in concentration, memory problems, impaired judgement, and an elevated probability of making mistakes, which negatively effects the quality of patient care (Rudman et al., 2020).


Likewise, the current study found that nurses exhibited a medium level of emotional impairment, as presented in Table 3. Ribeiro et al. (2021), who aimed to study the effect of burnout on the quality of life of 83 nurses in an emergency unit, confirmed the same finding. In their study, they found that emotional impairment was 55.4%, which indicates an average level of emotional impairment among nurses. This result highlights the continuous exposure of critical care unit nurses to traumatic incidents, patient suffering, high-pressure situations, caring for critically ill patients, supporting their families, and dealing with life-and-death situations. This may lead nurses to a feeling of empathy for patients and their families, which may manifest as sadness and feelings of helplessness. Over time, emotional impairment may happen, making nurses more susceptible to burnout (Whittaker, Gillum & Kelly, 2018).


Equitably, the present study revealed that nurses experience a moderate level of psychological distress, as presented in Table 3. The study by van den Boogert et al. (2022), which aimed to investigate the relationship between perceived stress, sensory processing patterns, and job burnout in employed individuals, aligns with these results. They found in their study that the average score of psychological distress was (2.1), signifying an average level of psychological distress. The results were surprising to the researchers. The level of psychological distress was moderate, and they had high expectations that it would be at a high level. As nurses are routinely dealing with seriously ill patients, observing the suffering and facing the death of patients can take a significant emotional toll on nurses. They may suffer feelings of sadness and helplessness, exacerbated by the stress of working for long, often evening shift that disrupts their sleep pattern, leading to psychosomatic distress (Dijxhoorn et al., 2021).


Similarly, as shown in Table 3, the mean score for the psychosomatic complaints was 2.87, indicating a high level of psychosomatic complaints among nurses. These results disagreed with the research done by Basinska, Gruszczynska and Schaufeli (2023), which aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability among 255 nurses and offer a refined version of the burnout assessment tool. The study revealed that the mean score for psychosocial complaints was 2.48, demonstrating that nurses experience an average level of psychosomatic complaints. This result highlighted the fact that nurses are exposed to a high level of tension when working in critical care units. This tension elicits the natural physiologic response of fight or flight, resulting in the release of hormones like cortisol and adrenaline. Over time, these hormones may dysregulate, leading to physical symptoms like chest pain and heart palpitations. Work tension can also affect the digestive system, causing symptoms such as nausea and indigestion. Prolonged working hours standing on their feet can cause muscle tension and pain, particularly in the neck, shoulder, and back, which can ultimately lead to musculoskeletal system disorders. Additionally, working in healthcare environments, particularly critical care units, exposes healthcare workers to pathogens, leading to frequent illnesses (Yanto, Djudiyah & Syakarofath, 2022).

The results support earlier studies such as Meneguin et al. (2023), Ribeiro et al. (2021), and van den Boogert et al. (2022), which reported a high level of exhaustion, a medium level of emotional impairment, and psychological distress, respectively. A heavy workload, caring for critically ill patients, dealing with death and life situations, and making quick decisions are key risk factors for burnout. However, the findings of this study challenge the work of Barnard et al. (2023), Palvimo, Vauhkonen and Hult (2023), and Basinska, Gruszczynska and Schaufeli (2023), who noted a high level of mental distance, cognitive impairment, and an average level of psychosomatic complaints. This may be due to variations in the study population, sample size, and measurement tools applied. This highlighted the physical impact that nurses may experience while working in critical care units. These findings suggest the need for interventions to decrease burnout among critical care nurses, such as providing adequate staff levels, breaks, and time off; applying stress management programs; presenting flexible work schedules; fostering collaboration and support between colleagues; making mental health services accessible; and providing health screening.


Apart from all of the above findings, the limitation of the study lies in its focus on 13 hospitals, potentially restricting the applicability of its findings to other healthcare environments.


CONCLUSION

This study highlighted the substantial presence of high burnout among our target nurses in critical care units. Nurses in critical care units must be mentally, cognitively, emotionally, psychologically, and psychosomatically prepared to handle a variety of patient situations. Hospitals should implement preventive measures to improve professional development, quality of life and professional performance by improving the role of the nursing leader in diagnosing and treating burnout among nurses. Hospitals should also implement organizational changes such as flexible work schedules, adequate staffing levels to manage workloads, a supportive work environment, and mental health resources. Education about burnout phenomena and appropriate coping strategies like mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and resilience training programs can address this. Furthermore, studies should focus on replicating this study in critical care units in other Iraqi hospitals to compare and improve the generalization of the findings. In addition, determining the effectiveness of this tool in assessing the burnout level among nurses in six domains of the tool requires further research in multiple countries using the same tool used in this study. Moreover, analysing the impact of organizational policies and leadership in mitigating burnout could offer valuable insights and practical recommendations for healthcare institutions globally.


Conflict of Interest

The authors affirm that they have no conflict of interest


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to express special appreciation to the nurses involved in the study.


REFERENCES

Abdulnabi, Z. A., & AL-Fayyadh, S. (2021). Barriers of professional autonomy among arab- speaking countries during covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences, 7(3), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v7i3.1004


Alkhawaldeh, J. F. M. A., Soh, K. L., Mukhtar, F. B. M., & Ooi, C. P. (2020). Effectiveness of stress management interventional programme on occupational stress for nurses: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12938


Al-Rjoub, S. F., Diener, E., & Sadeq, A. F. (2022). Nurse administrators as the cause of moral distress among nurse educators: A qualitative research study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 43, 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.09.007


Alzahrani, H. M., Alanazi, E. F., & Almutairi, S. M. (2024). Burnout among nurses in intensive care unit in Saudi Arabia: Implications for nursing management. British Journal of Nursing Studies, 4(2), 01-09. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjns.2024.4.2.1


Ashipala, D. O., & Nghole, T. M. (2022). Factors contributing to burnout among nurses at a district hospital in Namibia: A qualitative perspective of nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 30(7), 2982-2991. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13693


Barnard, N. B., Rothmann, S., De Beer, L. T., & Lubbe, W. (2023). Burnout of emergency nurses in a South African context: The role of job demands and resources, and capabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1119063


Basinska, B. A., Gruszczynska, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2023). The Polish adaptation of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT-PL) by Schaufeli et al. Psychiatria Polska, 57(1), 223-235. https://doi.org/10.12740/pp/onlinefirst/141563


Browning, S. G. (2019). Burnout in critical care nurses. Critical Care Nursing Clinics, 31(4), 527-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnc.2019.07.008


Bruyneel, A., Smith, P., Tack, J., & Pirson, M. (2021). Prevalence of burnout risk and factors associated with burnout risk among ICU nurses during the COVID-19 outbreak in French speaking Belgium. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103059


Cishahayo, E., Nankundwa, E., Sego, R., Bhengu, B., & Cishahayo, E. U. (2017). Burnout among nurses working in critical care settings: a case of a selected tertiary hospital in Rwanda. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 5(12), 5121-5128. http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20175430


Clark, K., Milner, K. A., Beck, M., & Mason, V. (2016). Measuring family satisfaction with care delivered in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Nurse, 36(6), e8-e14. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2016276


Dadoosh, K. A., & Sadeq, A. F. (2022). Compassion fatigue among nursing staff practicing at neurological wards. Res Militaris, 12(2), 4614-4623. https://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://resmilitaris.net/uploads/paper/44eed257768 2f2ea4dc600c89c5d71b6.pdf . Accessed on 26th January, 2024.


de Looff, P., Nijman, H., Didden, R., & Embregts, P. (2018). Burnout symptoms in forensic psychiatric nurses and their associations with personality, emotional intelligence and client aggression: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 25(8), 506-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12496


Dijxhoorn, A. F. Q., Brom, L., van der Linden, Y. M., Leget, C., & Raijmakers, N. J. (2021). Healthcare professionals’ work-related stress in palliative care: a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 62(3), e38-e45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.04.004


Hamad, Z., & Qassim, W. (2019). Effectiveness of an educational program in enhancing nurses’ knowledge about occupational health hazards. Iraqi National Journal of Nursing Specialties, 32(2), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.58897/injns.v32i2.331


Jabar, M. T., & Jasim, A. H. (2021). Job stress among nurses at critical care units in medical city complex hospitals in Baghdad city. Annals of The Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(6), 4132-4138. http://annalsofrscb.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/6203. Accessed on 24th December, 2023.


Kadhim, H., & Qassem, W. J. (2023). Impact of physical work environment upon nurses’ job performance in al-nassiryah city hospitals. Iraqi National Journal of Nursing Specialties, 36(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.58897/injns.v36i1.707


Khatatbeh, H., Pakai, A., Al‐Dwaikat, T., Onchonga, D., Amer, F., Prémusz, V., & Oláh, A. (2022). Nurses’ burnout and quality of life: A systematic review and critical analysis of measures used. Nursing Open, 9(3), 1564-1574. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.936


Konstantinou, A. K., Bonotis, K., Sokratous, M., Siokas, V., & Dardiotis, E. (2018). Burnout evaluation and potential predictors in a Greek cohort of mental health nurses. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 32(3), 449-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.01.002


Kowalczuk, K., Krajewska-Kułak, E., & Sobolewski, M. (2020). The effect of subjective perception of work in relation to occupational and demographic factors on the mental health of polish nurses. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.591957


Kumar, A., Sinha, A., Varma, J. R., Prabhakaran, A. M., Phatak, A. G., & Nimbalkar, S. M. (2021). Burnout and its correlates among nursing staff of intensive care units at a tertiary care center. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 10(1), 443-448. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1651_20


Kyei, E., & Takyi, S. A. (2024). Burnout, Associated Determinants and Effects among Nurses and Midwives at Selected CHAG Facilities in the Greater Accra Region, Ghana, Research Square. PREPRINT (Version 1). http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3847310/v1


Lewandowska, K., Weisbrot, M., Cieloszyk, A., Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, W., Krupa, S., & Ozga, D. (2020). Impact of alarm fatigue on the work of nurses in an intensive care environment—a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8409. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228409


Mansour, H. K., & Hussien, H. A. (2020). Occupational burnout among nurses working at governmental teaching hospitals in Babylon province, Iraq. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(04). http://dx.doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I4/PR2020543


Meneguin, S., Ignácio, I., Pollo, C. F., Honório, H. M., Patini, M. S. G., & de Oliveira, C. (2023). Burnout and quality of life in nursing staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Nursing, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01168-7

Mohammed, D., & Bakey, S. (2021). Detection of depression among Nurses Providing Care for Patients with COVID-19 at Baqubah Teaching Hospital. Iraqi National Journal of Nursing Specialties, 34(1), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.58897/injns.v34i1.464


Mudallal, R. H., Othman, W. A. M., & Al Hassan, N. F. (2017). Nurses’ burnout: the influence of leader empowering behaviors, work conditions, and demographic traits. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 54, https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958017724944


Nantsupawat, A., Kunaviktikul, W., Nantsupawat, R., Wichaikhum, O. A., Thienthong, H., & Poghosyan, L. (2017). Effects of nurse work environment on job dissatisfaction, burnout, intention to leave. International Nursing Review, 64(1), 91-98.https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12342

Palvimo, T., Vauhkonen, A., & Hult, M. (2023). The associations among destructive leadership, job demands and resources, and burnout among nurses: A cross‐sectional survey study. Journal of Nursing Management, 2023(1), https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4289450


Preetam K, V. (2023). Burnout Syndrome among Nurses in Intensive Care Unit: An Essential Approach. Asian Journal of Research in Nursing and Health, 6(1), 337-342. http://eprints.go2submission.com/id/eprint/1880/1/Nikita612023AJRNH103611.pdf . Accessed on 20th November, 2023.

Rajih, Q. (2020). Effectiveness of an education program on nursing staffs' knowledge about infection control measures at intensive care unit in al-diwaniya teaching hospital. Iraqi National Journal of Nursing Specialties, 33(1), 85-92.

https://doi.org/10.58897/injns.v33i1.406

Ribeiro, E. K. D. A., Santos, R. C. D., Araújo-Monteiro, G. K. N. D., Brandão, B. M. L. D. S., Silva, J. C. D., & Souto, R. Q. (2021). Influence of burnout syndrome on the quality of life of nursing professionals: Quantitative study. Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem, 74(Suppl 3). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0298

Rudman, A., Arborelius, L., Dahlgren, A., Finnes, A., & Gustavsson, P. (2020). Consequences of early career nurse burnout: A prospective long-term follow-up on cognitive functions, depressive symptoms, and insomnia. EClinical Medicine, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100565

Saravanabavan, L., Sivakumar, M. N., & Hisham, M. (2019). Stress and burnout among intensive care unit healthcare professionals in an Indian tertiary care hospital. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 23(10). 462–466. https://doi.org/10.5005%2Fjp-journals-10071- 23265

Schaufeli, W. B., Desart, S., & De Witte, H. (2020). Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)— development, validity, and reliability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249495

Schwarz, G. M., & Bouckenooghe, D. (2021). When the dodo became extinct: Why rethinking change should not take a pandemic. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320973809

See, K. C., Zhao, M. Y., Nakataki, E., Chittawatanarat, K., Fang, W. F., Faruq, M. O., ... & SABA. Study investigators and the Asian critical care clinical trials group. (2018). Professional burnout among physicians and nurses in Asian intensive care units: A multinational survey. Intensive Care Medicine, 44, 2079-2090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5432-1

Shafran Tikva, S., Gabay, G., Shkoler, O., & Kagan, I. (2024). Association of quality of nursing care with violence load, burnout, and listening climate. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 13(1), 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-024-00601-3

Shah, M. K., Gandrakota, N., Cimiotti, J. P., Ghose, N., Moore, M., & Ali, M. K. (2021). Prevalence of and factors associated with nurse burnout in the US. JAMA Network Open, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36469

Singh, G. (2022). Essential Emergency Critical Care (EECC) related research articles: A literature review. Malaysian Journal of Medical Research (MJMR), 6(3), 55-57. https://doi.org/10.31674/mjmr.2022.v6i03.007


Terry, C. L., & Weaver, A. L. (2011). Critical Care Nursing Demystified. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, United States. https://www.stikeskeluargabunda.ac.id/app_other/file/buku/materi_1617587989.pdf . Accessed on 22nd January, 2024.

Torre, M., Popper, M. S., & Bergesio, A. (2019). Burnout prevalence in intensive care nurses in Argentina. Enfermería Intensiva (English ed.), 30(3), 108-115.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfie.2018.04.005

van den Boogert, F., Spaan, P., Sizoo, B., Bouman, Y. H., Hoogendijk, W. J., & Roza, S. J. (2022). Sensory processing, perceived stress and burnout symptoms in a working population during the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2043. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042043

Whittaker, B. A., Gillum, D. R., & Kelly, J. M. (2018). Burnout, moral distress, and job turnover in critical care nurses. International Journal of Studies in Nursing, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.20849/ijsn.v3i3.516

Woo, T., Ho, R., Tang, A., & Tam, W. (2020). Global prevalence of burnout symptoms among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 123, 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.12.015

World Health Organization. (2019). International Classification of Diseases. Burn-out an occupational phenomenon. https://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/burn-out/en/ . Accessed on 29th January, 2024.

Yanto, R. F., Djudiyah, D., & Syakarofath, N. A. (2022). Nurses’ experience with burnout and therole of perceived social support. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 10(1), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v10i1.18483

Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49-54.https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6