Mohanned Khaleel Abdullah1, Mohammad Faris Abdulghani2, Radhwan Hussein Ibrahim2*, Hanady Jabbar Mahmood1, Ommar Akram Mohsen2, Raghad Saad Jassim2
1College of Nursing, University of Mosul, City of Mosul 4001, Iraq
2College of Nursing, Ninevah University, 85H2+VCM, Mosul, Nineveh Governorate, Iraq
*Correspondence Author’s Email: Prof.dr.radhwan@uomosul.edu.iq
ABSTRACT
Background: The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of individual variables among staff nurses on their knowledge, attitudes, and implementation of evidence-based practice in the City of Mosul, Iraq. Additionally, the study aims to identify the characteristics that either facilitate or hinder the implementation of evidence-based practice. Methods: A cross-sectional, correlational design was used. The principles outlined in the STROBE Checklist is followed while sharing this study. A sample of 250 staff nurses was conveniently picked from five hospitals in Mosul, Iraq. The survey consisted of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire and individual variables as questions. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression models. Results: The average age of the participants was 31.0 years, with a standard deviation of 5.5 years. The majority of participants indicated a lack of knowledge, abilities, and experience in evidence-based practice (EBP), while expressing moderate views towards EBP. The area of study revealed distinct disparities in average scores for knowledge or skills, attitudes, and practice. Nurses had significantly greater knowledge, abilities, and practice of evidence-based practice (EBP) compared to midwives (p<0.001). Nurses and midwives who had master's degrees demonstrated superior knowledge, abilities, and implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP), as well as more favorable attitudes compared to nurses with bachelor's degrees (p<0.001). Conclusion: Nurses in the city of Mosul are eager to participate in the evidence-based practice approach. Nevertheless, nurses have recognized the need to enhance their knowledge and abilities to actively engage in the process.
INTRODUCTION
In the 21st century, healthcare consumers expect that the treatment they get is based on scientific evidence. Evidence-based practices (EBP) substitute non-scientific, ritualistic, and traditional activities with those that are grounded on the most reliable and up-to-date evidence (Crawford et al., 2020; Kujur et al., 2023). In order to improve patient outcomes, it is necessary to convert new information into forms that are relevant in a clinical setting, successfully deploy these forms throughout the whole care team within a systems context, and monitor their influence on performance and health outcomes in a meaningful way (Priya et al., 2023; Stevens, 2013).
Evidence-based practice (EBP) refers to the process of making therapeutic decisions based on the most reliable and up-to-date evidence, taking into account the specific circumstances of the care being provided, the preferences of the client, and the professional expertise of the healthcare practitioner (Cardoso et al., 2021). The emergence of evidence-based nursing (EBN) research has led to a shift in the conventional empiricism model of nursing towards a new paradigm that emphasizes the use of genuine and verifiable scientific data from patients (Wang et al., 2020). The process of linking research with practical application leads to increased nursing integration, and enabling nurses to evaluate academic research and practical procedures based on evidence leads to professional building of evidence-based nursing (Anaman-Torgbor et al., 2022). In developed countries, such as Germany, the United Kingdom, or Australia, those in charge of the nursing profession focus on making the profession based on evidence-based practice, and since the early nineties, valuable initiatives have emerged to support this trend by specialized organizations to provide a set of resources related to EBP (Yoo et al., 2019). Recently, Iraq has witnessed significant progress in the field of nursing education aimed at enhancing the quality of nursing services and meeting the needs of the labor market in the public and private sectors (Attia & Ibrahim, 2023; Hamarash et al., 2023; Sulaiman et al., 2023). In Iraq, the steps towards global trends in building evidence-based nursing are still modest, despite the increase in the number of high degree holders in the country, and the expansion in the development of nursing outcomes in recent years and the introduction of teaching evidence-based practices in nursing curricula, there remains an urgent need to evaluate the duration of Nursing cadres returned to adopting such practices, so this study came with the aim of evaluating the knowledge, attitudes and practices of nursing staff in the city of Mosul towards apply evidence-based practices and identify associated factors.
METHODOLOGY
Study Design: A cross-sectional study carried out in hospitals in the city of Mosul, Iraq, during the period from March to April 2023.
Study Sample: A purposive sample of 250 nurses providing nursing care in five major Mosul hospitals.
Study Tools: The study tool prepared for the purpose of collecting data included two main parts. The first covered descriptive information about the study participants, such as age, gender, educational level, and length of service in nursing care. As for the second part, a special scale was adopted to measure nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward evidence-based practices, consisting of 24 items.
The validity and reliability of the tool were confirmed before all the data were collected.
Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics were relied upon to analyze quantitative and qualitative data using frequencies, percentages, arithmetic means, and standard deviations.
Inferential statistics were used to determine the relationship between the dimensions of the trilogy study and the variables and factors associated with them. A value of P<0.05 is generally adopted to indicate a significant effect. All data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.
Ethical Consideration
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Ninevah Institutional Review Board (IRB), Iraq with reference approval number. CCMRE-NUR-23-4 on 17h of April 2023.
RESULTS
Participant Characteristics
The study involved the participation of 250 nurses, primarily females (n=193, 77.2%). These participants had an average age of 35.8 years (standard deviation, SD=7.4). A majority of the participants held a bachelor’s degree in nursing (n=171, 68.4%), and their collective nursing experience averaged 9.3 years (SD=6.1).
Characteristic | n | % |
Gender | ||
- Women | 193 | 77.2 |
- Men | 57 | 22.8 |
Age (years) | ||
- Mean | 35.8 | |
- SD | 7.4 | |
Education | ||
- Bachelor's | 171 | 68.4 |
- Master's | 62 | 24.8 |
- Doctoral | 17 | 6.8 |
Years of Experience | ||
- Mean | 9.3 | |
- SD | 6.1 |
Note: n=250
Knowledge, Practices and Attitudes
In terms of knowledge, nurses showed the highest proficiency in assessing the clinical applicability of information (5.41±1.51) and applying information to individual cases (5.49±1.22). On the other hand, they demonstrated the lowest proficiency in formulating research questions based on
information needs (4.09±1.56) and determining the clinical applicability of information technology (4.47±1.63). In terms of attitudes, nurses showed a positive attitude towards EBP. They strongly agreed that EBP is an essential component of professional practice (6.16± 2.9) and were willing to allocate sufficient time for research within the work schedule (4.85±1.92). They also reported being willing to encourage queries within their personal practice (5.65±1.66) and modify practice based on identified evidence (5.59±1.58). In terms of practice, nurses demonstrated the highest proficiency in reviewing their personal practice periodically (5.51±1.41) and identifying areas in professional practice requiring improvement (5.38±1.29). They demonstrated the lowest proficiency in assessing literature in a critical manner (3.56±1.9) and locating pertinent evidence (3.84±1.9) (Table 2).
Knowledge | Mean Std |
1. Proficiency in conducting research | 4.22 ± 1.77 |
2. Critical evaluation of evidence according to established standards | 4.77 ± 1.42 |
3. Retrieval of relevant evidence | 4.65 ± 1.74 |
4. Assessment of material's accuracy and validity | 4.81 ± 1.36 |
5. Formulating research questions based on information needs | 4.09 ± 1.56 |
6. Familiarity with prominent information types and sources | 4.64 ± 1.22 |
7. Determining the clinical applicability of information | 5.41 ± 1.51 |
8. Competence in information technology | 4.47 ± 1.63 |
9. Regular monitoring and assessment of practice | 4.64 ± 1.41 |
10. Application of information to individual cases | 5.49 ± 1.22 |
11. Identification of areas in professional practice requiring improvement | 5.38 ± 1.29 |
12. Periodic review of personal practice | 5.51 ± 1.41 |
13. Sharing new care concepts with colleagues | 5.33 ± 1.33 |
14. Collaborating and exchanging information with colleagues | 5.39 ± 1.39 |
Attitudes | Mean Std |
15. Allocating sufficient time for research within the work schedule | 4.85 ± 1.92 |
16. Encouraging queries within the personal practice | 5.65 ± 1.66 |
17. Modifying practice based on the identified evidence | 5.59 ± 1.58 |
18. Evidence-based practice is an essential component of professional practice. | 6.16 ± 2.9 |
Practice | Mean Sd |
19. Assessing literature in a critical manner | 3.56 ± 1.9 |
20. Analyzing the Results of personal practice | 4.41 ± 1.96 |
21. Disseminating information to peers | 4.49 ± 1.95 |
22. Combining expertise with evidence-based knowledge | 4.14 ± 2 |
23. Locating pertinent evidence | 3.84 ± 1.9 |
24. Constructing precise and concise inquiries | 3.85 ± 1.7 |
Table 3 shows the comparisons for nursing knowledge, attitude, practice, and total EBP scores based on different nurse demographics. The results indicate that there is no significant difference in knowledge, practice, attitude, or total EBP scores between male and female nurses. Nurses with less than 5 years of clinical experience have higher knowledge, practice, attitude, and total EBP scores compared to those with 5-10 years and over 10 years of clinical experience. Nurses with over 10 years of experience had the lowest attitude scores among all the groups. There is no significant difference in knowledge, practice, attitude, or total EBP scores between nurses who are nursing administrators and those who are not. Nurses with research experience have significantly higher practice and total EBP scores than those without. Regarding qualification, nurses with a master's degree have significantly higher knowledge, practice, attitude, and total EBP scores than those with a diploma or bachelor's degree. Nurses with a bachelor's degree have significantly higher practice and overall EBP scores than those with a diploma. (Table 3).
Gender | Knowledge | Practice | Attitude | Total EBP |
Men | 71.8 | 60.9 | 78.6 | 72.1 |
Women | 69.4 | 56.1 | 76.5 | 69.4 |
p-value | 0.418 | 0.364 | 0.428 | 0.531 |
Clinical Experience | ||||
< 5 years | 72.4 | 61.3 | 83.1 | 71.6 |
5–10 years | 70.4 | 54.7 | 77.1 | 69.2 |
> 10 years | 65.2 | 52.6 | 65.1 | 60.4 |
p-value | 0.211 | 0.45 | 0.006* | 0.088 |
Position | ||||
Yes | 72.8 | 58.1 | 76.1 | 67.2 |
No | 71.2 | 57.8 | 78.5 | 68.5 |
p-value | 0.414 | 0.717 | 0.5 | 0.641 |
Research Experience | ||||
Yes | 75 | 59.7 | 81 | 74 |
No | 74 | 56.8 | 79 | 79 |
p-value | 0.314 | 0.014* | 0.89 | 0.045* |
Qualification | ||||
Diploma | 66 | 43 | 72 | 62 |
Bachelors | 71 | 59 | 73 | 67 |
Masters | 77 | 67 | 81 | 76 |
p-value | 0.05* | 0.005* | 0.416 | 0.003* |
Perceived Barriers
Descriptive statistics were also used to summarize the data related to perceived barriers to evidence-based practice. The most reported barrier was lack of time (mean score=3.9, SD=0.6), followed by lack of support from management (mean score=3.7, SD=0.7), and lack of access to relevant research (mean score=3.6, SD=0.6) (Table 4).
Barrier | Mean | SD |
Lack of Time | 3.9 | 0.6 |
Lack of Support from Management | 3.7 | 0.7 |
Lack of Access to Relevant Research | 3.6 | 0.6 |
Note: n=250
Relationships between Variables
Pearson correlations were utilized to investigate the associations between various variables. A significant and positive correlation emerged between nurses' practices and their attitudes toward evidence-based practice (r=0.55, p<0.001), indicating that nurses with more favorable attitudes were more inclined to integrate evidence-based practice into their daily routines. Furthermore, a noteworthy positive correlation surfaced between nurses' knowledge levels and their attitudes toward evidence-based practice (r=0.39, p<0.001), implying that nurses possessing greater knowledge about evidence-based practice tended to hold more positive attitudes toward it. (Table 5).
Correlation | Practices | Knowledge | Attitudes |
Practices | 1 | 0.39** | 0.55** |
Knowledge | 0.39** | 1 | 0.39** |
Attitudes | 0.55** | 0.39** | 1 |
Note: **p<0.001, n=250
The findings indicate a pattern where each successive model demonstrated an enhancement over the preceding one, with the inclusion of additional predictors resulting in an increased R2 value. The final model (model 3) exhibited an exceptionally high R2 value (0.988), signifying that the predictors encompassed within this model can elucidate a substantial proportion of the variance in the dependent variable. Notably, the p-values associated with the changes in R2 and F-change were all significantly smaller, underscoring the statistical significance of the improvements introduced in each subsequent model. (Table 6)
Model | R | R2 | Adjusted R2 | Std. Error of the Estimate | Change Statistics | ||
R2 | F | p-value | |||||
Knowledge | 0.891a | 0.794 | 0.793 | 6.436 | 0.794 | 677.779 | 0.000 |
Knowledge and Practice | 0.976b | 0.953 | 0.952 | 3.082 | 0.159 | 609.148 | 0.000 |
Knowledge, Practice, and Attitudes | 0.988c | 0.988 | 0.988 | 0.041 | 0.049 | 1,465,765 | 0.000 |
Collectively, these results underscore the robust predictive capacity of the factors incorporated into model 3, namely knowledge levels, nursing practices, and nursing attitudes. These factors should be duly considered when exploring the intricate relationship between these predictors and the dependent variable.
DISCUSSION
Effective nursing leadership plays a crucial role in motivating and inspiring nurses, who comprise the majority of the healthcare workforce, to perform at the highest level within their professional licenses (Mahdi, & Faraj, 2022). A large majority of nurses in this survey made effective use of evidence-based practice. In a similar vein, research has shown that 51.8% of nurses in Ethiopia (Aynalem et al., 2021), 57.6% in Kenya (Kyalo Mutisya et al., 2015), 39.9% in Nigeria (Forland et al., 2014), and 54% in all four countries used evidence-based practice while providing treatment to patients. To build a favorable attitude toward EBP and increase its use in clinical practice, the first step is to become familiar with the EBP process. However, just having theoretical knowledge may not be enough to generate positive attitudes or improve application in practice (Iradukunda & Mayers, 2020).
A notable discovery from this research was the lack of substantial predictive impact of age, gender, and department in the suggested predictive model. Alqahtani et al. (2020) conducted previous research in Saudi Arabia that aligned with this finding. However, other research (Hellier & Cline, 2016; Kim et al., 2016) has demonstrated that factors like advancing age, being female, and having magnet status have a favorable and substantial influence on scores related to the application of evidence-based practice. Recent work has highlighted significant disparities between research findings and the implementation of evidence-based practices in nursing. Additionally, researchers have found impediments that hinder the translation of research data into clinical practice. The obstacles to implementing evidence-based nursing practice have remained constant in several studies. An obstacle arises when the nursing profession resists adopting new methods of practice throughout the creation and advancement of nursing and medical knowledge. (Johnston et al., 2016; Duncombe, 2018; Spooner et al., 2018; Lizarondo et al., 2019). Prior research has demonstrated that education and skill development, resource availability, time management, and guidance from EBP mentors may have an impact on nurses' attitudes towards and adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP). Therefore, nurses who possess expertise and proficiency in evidence-based practice (EBP), have access to necessary resources, get support from their experience, or actively contribute to the development of evidence-based guidelines and procedures have a stronger belief in EBP. (Xie et al., 2017; Karakoç-Kumsar et al., 2020; Yılmaz & Gürler, 2017).
CONCLUSION
A major obstacle to the implementation of EBP might be the absence of assistance from clinical instructors, who play a crucial role as nurse educators and clinical instructors in teaching EBP. A shift in practice involves theoretical grounding, skill acquisition, real-world experience, and inspirational leaders to guide the way. The incorporation of evidence-based practice (EBP) instruction into the nursing curriculum from the very beginning of the undergraduate degree, with equal weight given to theory and practice, is essential if we are to produce competent nurses who will utilize evidence to track and improve patient care.
Recommendation
This research did not examine the extent of evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge and abilities among educators and clinical instructors at nursing schools. This factor could have an impact on the learning opportunities available to students. Research should be performed to examine the implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) learning in practical settings.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to extend their heartfelt gratitude to all the nurses who participated in this research at Mosul Teaching Hospital, City of Mosul, Iraq for their invaluable contributions and cooperation. The author also expresses appreciation to the management and staff of Mosul Teaching Hospital for their support and facilitation throughout the data collection process. Furthermore, the author would like to thank the research team members for their diligent efforts in designing the study, collecting and analyzing the data, and interpreting the results. Their expertise and commitment significantly enriched the quality of this research.
REFERENCES
Alqahtani, N., Oh, K. M., Kitsantas, P., & Rodan, M. (2020). Nurses' evidence-based practice knowledge, attitudes and implementation: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(1-2), 274-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15097
Anaman-Torgbor, J. A., Nyande, F. K., Amenuke, M., Gyapong, B., Dodunoo, D., & Tarkang, E. (2022). Evidence-Based Nursing Practice in Ghana. SAGE Open Nursing 8, 23779608221088252. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608221088252
Attia, Y. K., & Ibrahim, R. H. (2023). Difficulties experienced in clinical learning settings for nurses in Iraq: Perspectives of nursing administrators and nursing instructors. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 38, 101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2023.101229
Aynalem, Z. B., Yazew, K. G., & Gebrie, M. H. (2021). Evidence-based practice utilization and associated factors among nurses working in Amhara Region Referral Hospitals, Ethiopia. PLoS One, 16(3), e0248834. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248834
Cardoso, D., Couto, F., Cardoso, A. F., Bobrowicz-Campos, E., Santos, L., Rodrigues, R., Coutinho, V., Pinto, D., Ramis, M. A., Rodrigues, M. A., & Apóstolo, J. (2021). The Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Educational Program on Undergraduate Nursing Students' EBP Knowledge and Skills: A Cluster Randomized Control Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010293
Crawford, C. L., Rondinelli, J., Zuniga, S., Valdez, R. M., Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., & Titler, M. G. (2020). Testing of the Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Survey. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(2), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12432
Forland, F., Rehfuess, E., Klatser, P., Kyamanywa, P., & Mayanja-Kizza, H. (2014). Why Evidence Based Approaches are urgently needed in Africa. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes, 108(10), 606- 608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2014.10.025
Hamarash, M. Q., Yaas, M. H., Almushhadany, O. I., & Ibrahim, R. H. (2023). Preceptoring of Graduate Nursing Students in Iraq. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 14, 1025-1034. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S418824
Hellier, S., & Cline, T. (2016). Factors that affect nurse practitioners' implementation of evidence- based practice. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 28 https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12394
Iradukunda, F., & Mayers, P. M. (2020). Rwandan nursing students' knowledge, attitudes and application of evidence-based practice. Curationis, 43(1), e1-e7. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v43i1.2005
Karakoç-Kumsar, A., Polat, Ş., & Afşar-Doğrusöz, L. (2020). Determining Attitudes of Nurses Toward Evidence-Based Nursing in a University Hospital Sample. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 28(3), 268-275. https://doi.org/10.5152/fnjn.2020.19022
Kim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A. M., & Davidson, J. E. (2016). Predictors of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation, Job Satisfaction, and Group Cohesion Among Regional Fellowship Program Participants. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(5), 340-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12171
Kujur, F., Mandal, A., Guha, S., & Poddar, S. (2024). The role of digital technologies in promoting academic entrepreneurship: A framework proposal. Chapter 9 in book Recent trends in business and entrepreneurial ventures, edited by S. A. Salman, S. Poddar, & V. Nitsenko (Eds.), Nova Science Publishers. https://doi.org/10.52305/KZZV1105
Kyalo Mutisya, A., KagureKarani, A., & Kigondu, C. (2015). Research Utilization among Nurses at a Teaching Hospital in Kenya. Journal of Caring Sciences 4(2), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.010
Mahdi, I. S., & Faraj, R. K. (2022). Evaluation of leadership competencies among nurse managers Mosul Journal of Nursing10(3), 154-160. https://doi.org/10.33899/mjn.2022.175418
Priya, N., Satpathy, I., Patnaik, B. C. M., & Poddar, S. (2024). Workplace wellness programs of healthcare sectors in India and the Middle East. Chapter 4 in book Sustainable Disaster Management and Human Health, edited by S. Poddar, D. Bose, & N. Memon (Eds.). Nova Science Publishers. https://doi.org/10.52305/FOED7384
Stevens, K. R. (2013). The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18(2), 4.
https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04
Sulaiman, M. H., Jasim, M. S., Ahmed, A. A., Ahmed, A. A., Ibrahim, R. H., & Al-Mashhadany, O. I. (2023). A winning formula for nursing education: Effective study strategies and techniques. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 18(4), e142-e145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.05.001
Wang, X., Lai, Q., Tian, Y., & Zou, L. (2020). Effect of evidence-based nursing intervention on upper limb function in postoperative radiotherapy patients with breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore), 99(11), e19183. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000019183
Xie, H.T., Zhou, Z. Y., Xu, C.Q., Ong, S., & Govindasamy, A. (2017). Nurses’ Attitudes towards Research and Evidence-Based Practice: Perspectives from Psychiatric Setting.JOJ Nurse Health Care, 3(5).https://juniperpublishers.com/jojnhc/pdf/JOJNHC.MS.ID.555624.pdf
Yılmaz, M., & Gürler, H. (2017). Opinions of nurses in relation to evidence-based practice.Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi, 25(1), 1-12.https://doi.org/10.17672/fnhd.12049
Yoo, J. Y., Kim, J. H., Kim, J. S., Kim, H. L., & Ki, J. S. (2019). Clinical nurses' beliefs, knowledge, organizational readiness and level of implementation of evidence-based practice: The first step to creating an evidence-based practice culture. PLoS One, 14(12), e0226742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226742