The Needs of Critical Care Unit Patient's Family Members in East Cost Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Study


Nor Ayliwati Ali1,2, Noraini Hashim1*


1Faculty of Health Sciences, UiTM Selangor Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia


2Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kampung Gong Badak, 21300 Terengganu, Malaysia


*Corresponding Author’s Email: hnoraini@uitm.edu.my


ABSTRACT


Introduction: Involving family members is integral to the healing process and the patient's well-being in the Critical Care Unit (CCU). However, having a patient hospitalised in the CCU is quite challenging for the patient's family members and has become a traumatic experience for them. Therefore, the study objectives are to identify the important needs of CCU patients' family members and determine the relationship between their needs and sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among family members of patients who were admitted to the CCU in one government hospital in East Malaysia. About 96 participants were identified using convenience sampling and answered 42 questions in the Malay Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI-M). The data were analysed using IBM- SPSS Statistics Version 25. Results: Most of the family members who cared for the patient in the ICU were female, 76% (n = 73). The findings demonstrated that family members ranked assurance (3.69 ± 0.26) and information (3.59±0.34) as the most important needs compared to proximity (3.18±0.46), support (3.04±0.50), and comfort (2.53±0.46). There was no association between family members' age, gender, and experience with assurance, support, comfort, proximity, and information needs when the p-value > 0.05. Conclusions: In conclusion, recognising and addressing the needs of the ICU patient's family members is crucial for the strategy of CCU patient-family-centered care. The result of the study informs the importance of the involvement of family members in supporting CCU patients. By prioritising their needs and offering tailored support, healthcare providers can contribute to better patient outcomes and improved family well-being.


Keywords: Critical Care; Family Need; Intensive Care; Relative Need


INTRODUCTION


The critical care unit of a hospital is a vital setting where patients with severe illnesses or life- threatening conditions receive specialised and intensive medical care. Having a loved one hospitalised in the CCU can be painful for a patient's family. According to Josepha op‘t et al. (2020), a family member in a healthcare context is someone who is connected by blood, such as parents, siblings, or children, or by legal marriage, such as a spouse, and includes close relatives who are involved in the patient's care and well-being. There have been reports of a high incidence and severity of family members' burdens (Alsharari, 2019). Family members facing emotional instability can be stressful and life-altering (Koukouli et al., 2018; Björk, Lindahl & Fridh, 2019). While the primary focus within these units is to attend to the medical needs of the patients, it is imperative to acknowledge and address the unique needs of their family members, who play a crucial role in the care process. In the CCU, healthcare providers (HCPs) focus on patients as individuals and involve family members as a vital element of treatment, necessitating communication with family members (Mitchell et al., 2016). As frontline caregivers in CCUs, nurses play a pivotal role in facilitating communication, providing emotional support, and addressing the concerns of patients and their family members. More men than women are admitted to ICUs around the world; it remains unclear if this represents equitable access to critical care (Kotfis, Olusanya & Modra, 2024).


A patient's admission into the CCU commonly occurs unexpectedly when their medical condition rapidly deteriorates (Alsharari, 2019). The situation was having a high impact on both the patient and their family members. As CCU patients, most of them are critically ill, intubated, and ventilated with different levels of sedation, which limits their ability to communicate and interact with people around them, especially their family members (Björk, Lindahl & Fridh, 2019) and interferes with the patient's ability to decide the best treatment for themselves (Mitchell et al., 2016). The patient was likely incompetent enough to represent themselves; therefore, family members are reliable surrogates to decide the best treatments for their loved ones (Moss et al., 2019).


Although family members must deal with a loved one's critical illness, they must also adjust to the unfamiliar and daunting Intensive Care Unit (ICU) environment (Dijkstra et al., 2023). Significant distress among CCU family members is caused by the indeterminacy of CCU patients' state and prognosis, invasive mechanical ventilation, restrictive visiting policies, medication use by relatives, and maladaptive behavior of family members (Rückholdt et al., 2019; Iglesias et al., 2022). Family members suffer from psychological imbalance; they have moderate to high stress levels (Barth et al., 2016) and are exposed to the risk of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Abdul Halain et al., 2022; Iglesias et al., 2022). These psychological challenges are significantly more frequent when the relative is a spouse or bereaved family member (Alsharari, 2019).


Hence, this circumstance compels them to have various needs that must be met to adapt to these challenges. Valle & Lohne (2021) emphasised that HCPs need to ensure their relatives in the ICU are treated with the optimum quality of care and hope for a good prognosis. Thus, they must be informed about the patient's condition, prognosis, and treatment options. Family meetings facilitate communication between HCPs and family members to inform and update all required information for the family member. Yet, Davidson (2009) state that family needs are almost ignored, and they are not regarded as care team members. Consequently, it negatively affects patients' psychological and physical well-being, which causes a delay in the patient's physiological recovery process (Azoulay et al., 2003). Thus, nurses should recognise and address the needs of CCU patients' family members, which is integral to fostering a supportive and healing environment. Therefore, the study aims to determine the important needs of CCU patients' family members. This research's novelty lies in its unique focus on the East Coast region of Malaysia, which has distinct cultural and social factors influencing the needs of family members in CCU. By focusing on this unique group, this study adds significant knowledge to improving family-centered care in CCUs in the East Coast region.

METHODOLOGY


Study Design


This study was a descriptive, cross-sectional research design and was conducted at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Coronary Care Unit (CCU), and Acute Stroke Ward (ASW) in one of the government hospitals in East Coast Malaysia. ASW was included in this study because the unit's environment was similar to CCU for treating patients requiring critical care due to non-traumatic brain injury.


Sample Size Estimation


The sample size was estimated by using a single proportion sample size formula with the power of the study at 80%, a significance level of 0.05, and a 95% confidence interval. The required sample was 96 after adding a 20% drop-off rate.


Study Respondent


Out of 96 family members with relatives admitted to the ICU, CCU, and ASW were selected to participate in the study using convenience sampling. The inclusion criteria were a family member with a relative admitted to the ICU, CCU, or ASW for at least 48 hours, age 18 and above, and Malaysian nationality. While ICU, CCU, and ASW patients' family members who are unable to read and write and who have a visual impairment were excluded from the study.


Sampling Procedures and Respondent Recruitment


A convenience sampling technique was employed to identify family members while they were waiting for their hospitalised relatives in the ICU, CCU, and ASW. First, the researcher approached family members readily available in the family's ICU, CCU, and ASW waiting rooms. Next, the researcher introduced herself, briefly explained the study's purpose, and obtained informed and written consent. Then, the questionnaire was distributed to those who agreed to participate in the study and fulfill the inclusion criteria. They were given ample time to answer the questionnaire and return the completed form in the box near the exit waiting room.


Study Instrument


The study used a self-administered structured questionnaire, which consisted of two parts. Part one consists of demographic information on CCU patients' family members. The variables for demographic characteristics were gender, age, educational level, relationship status, patient length of stay in the CCU, and family members' experience caring for their relatives in the CCU. Meanwhile, part two adopted the Malay Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI-M) (Dharmalingam et al., 2016). The CCFNI-M comprises 42 items in the five domains of needs for CCU patients' family members (11 items of assurance, 6 items of information, 7 items of proximities, 6 items of comfort, and 12 items of support). All the items' responses used a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1= being not important and 4= very important). The overall maximum score for CCFNI-M is 168, and the minimum is 42. The Cronbach's alpha for general-scale CCFNI-M was 0.9 (17). A pilot study was conducted before the actual data collection, and the overall results of Cronbach's alpha were 0.81 and 0.90. The internal consistency score for the five domains is between 0.68 and 0.85. Since the internal consistency of the pilot study is categorised as accepted and good, there is no amendment to the CCFNI-M in the current study.


Ethical Consideration


The study received approval from the UiTM Research Ethics Committee, Malaysia with reference number REC/12/2021 (UG/MR/1177) on September 3rd, 2019 and the National Medical Research Register (NMR) with reference number NMRR-19-2725-49904 (IIR)] on 4thNovember, 2019.


RESULTS


Demographic Data


The mean and standard deviation (SD) for family members' age were 39.80 (SD:6.12) years old, and the patient's length of stay in the CCU was 68.75 (SD:9.21) hours. Most respondents were 73 (76.0%) females, and the rest were 23 (24%) males. With regards to respondent relationships, most of them were adult children (42.7%), followed by spouses (32.4%), parents (12.5%), siblings (7.3%), and relatives (5.2%). Most respondents had no experience caring for their family in the CCU, 67 (69.8%), and the rest, 29 (30.2%), had experience caring for patients in the CCU, as shown in Table 1.


Table 1: Demographic Characteristics

Variable

Frequency (%)

Mean (SD)

Age

39.80 (6.118)

Patient length of stay in ICU/CCU/Acute stroke ward

68.75 (9.210)

Gender

Male

23 (24.0)

Female

73 (76.0)

Family Patient Relationship

Spouse

31 (32.3)

Child

41(42.7)

Parent

12 (12.5)

Sibling

7 (7.3)

Relative

5 (5.2)

Educational Level

Primary

7 (7.3)

Secondary

63 (65.6)

Diploma

11 (11.5)

Degree

14 (14.6)

Master

1 (1.0)

Family Members ICU Experience

No

67 (69.8)

Yes

29 (30.2)

notes: n = 96

Table 2 shows the mean values of the CCFNI-M items among CCU patients' family members, ranging between 3.95 and 2.61. Item 16 "to be assured that the best care possible is being given to the patient" is the top crucial need of assurance that attained the higher score (3.95±0.27), followed by item 1 "to know the expected outcome" (3.91±0.29), and item 5 "to have a question answered honestly" (3.88±0.39). All of these needs fall under the assurance dimension. On the other hand, the least important needs ranked among family members were "to have comfortable furniture in the waiting room" (2.77±0.97), "to have a place to be alone while in the hospital" (2.71±0.93), and "to feel it is alright to cry when I want to" (2.61±0.83).


Table 2: Rank Order of Items Identified by Patient's Family Members

Items

Dimension

Means (M)

SD

16

Assurance

To be assured that the best care possible is being given to the patient.

3.95

0.266

1

Assurance

To know expected outcome

3.91

0.293

5

Assurance

To have question answered honestly.

3.88

0.391


40

Assurance

To know specific facts concerning the patient's progress.

3.75

0.435

15

Information

To know how the patient is being treated medically

3.72

0.537

37

Assurance

To be told about transfer plans while they are being made.

3.72

0.475

38

Assurance

To be called at home about changes in patient's condition.

3.7

0.526

24

Information

To talk about the possibility of the patient's death.

3.69

0.568

13

Information

To know why things were done for the patient

3.66

0.52

18

Information

To know exactly what is being done for the patient.

3.66

0.52


42

Proximity

To have waiting room near the patient.

3.66

0.54

34

Assurance

To have information given that are understandable.

3.64

0.583

4

Comfort

To have a specific person to call at hospital when unable to visit.

3.59

0.642

39

Assurance

To feel that hospital personnel care about the patient.

3.56

0.558

3

Assurance

/inf

To talk to the doctor every day.

3.54

0.679

9

Support

To have direction as to what to do at the bedside.

3.54

0.614

36

Assurance

To help with the patient's physical care.

3.49

0.598

11

Information

To know which staff members could give what type information.

3.46

0.56

2

Assurance

To have explanations of the environment before going into critical care unit.

3.45

0.647

35

Support

To have visiting hours start on time.

3.4

0.688

31

Proximity

To have a bathroom near the waiting room.

3.38

0.798

20

Comfort

To feel accepted by staff hospital.

3.35

0.649

14

Information

To know types of staff taking care of patient

3.34

0.63

8

Proximity

To have good food available in hospital.

3.31

0.772

41

Proximity

To see patient frequently.

3.3

0.783

7

Comfort

To talk about feeling about what was happened.

3.26

0.714

27

Support

To be assured it is alright to leave the hospital for a while.

3.21

0.78

6

Comfort

To have visiting hours changed for special conditions.

3.16

0.875

25

Support

To have another person with me when visiting the critical unit.

3.1

0.876

33

Support

To be told about someone to help with family problems.

3.04

0.857

23

Support

To have a pastor visit.

3.03

0.814

12

Support

To have friends nearby to support.

3.02

0.808

28

Proximity

To talk with same nurse every day.

2.93

0.811

10

Proximity

To visit any time.

2.9

0.912

30

Support

To be told about other people that could help with problems.

2.9

0.84

21

Support

To have someone to help with financial problems.

2.89

0.869

32

Support

To be alone whenever I want

2.85

0.846

26

Support

To have someone concern about my health.

2.84

0.91

22

Proximity

To have telephone near the waiting room.

2.79

1.045

19

Comfort

To have comfortable furniture in waiting room.

2.77

0.968

17

Comfort

To have a place to be alone while in the hospital.

2.71

0.928

29

Support

To feel it is alright to cry when I want to.

2.61

0.826

Notes: n=96


Table 3 presents the mean value of the CCFNI-M dimension that CCU patients' family members perceived, ranging between 2.53 and 3.69. Assurance is the most important patient's family need in the CCU (3.69 ± 0.26) followed by information (3.59±0.34), proximity (3.18±0.46), support (3.04±0.50), and comfort (2.53±0.46).


Table 3: Patient's Family Members' Perception towards the Needs of Patient's Family Members in the CCU


Domain

Means (M)

SD

Assurance

3.69

0.258

Information

3.59

0.344

Proximity

3.18

0.457

Support

3.04

0.498

Comfort

2.53

0.456

Notes: n=96


There is no significant association between family member age and the assurance dimension (r=0.018, p = 0.862), the support dimension (r = -0.063, p = 0.544), comfort (r =0.097, p = 0.349), proximity (r = -0.193, p = 0.06), or information dimension (r =-0.131, p = 0.202) (Table 4).


Table 4: Correlation between Family Member's Age and CCFNI-M Dimension

Variable

Family Member Age

r

P-value

Assurance

0.018

0.862

Support

-0.063

0.544

Comfort

0.097

0.349

Proximity

-0.193

0.060

Information

-0.131

0.202

Pearson Correlation Coefficient


Table 5 illustrates that there is no significant correlation between family members' gender and the assurance (rpb =0.097, p> 0.05), support (rpb = 0.037, p > 0.05), comfort (rpb = -0.080, p>0.05), proximity (rpb = -0.146, p > 0.05), and information (rpb = -0.012, p > 0.05) dimensions. The study also found that there was no significant correlation between family members past experience in the CCU with assurance (rpb =-0.069, p > 0.05), support (rpb = -0.037, p > 0.05), comfort (rpb = -0.110, p > 0.05), proximity (rpb =0.146, p > 0.05), or information dimension (rpb=0.043, p > 0.05).


Table 5: Correlation between Family Member Gender and Previous CCU Admission with CCFNI-M Dimension

Variable

Gender

Previous experience with family members' CCU hospitalization

rpb

P value

rpb

P value

Assurance

0.097

0.349

-0.069

0.503

Support

0.037

0.719

-0.037

0.721

Comfort

-0.080

0.438

-0.110

0.288

Proximity

-0.146

0.156

0.146

0.157

Information

-0.012

0.907

0.043

0.677

Biserial Correlation Coefficient


DISCUSSION


This study aims to identify the important needs of CCU patients' family members. The study found that assurance was the top need, followed by information for family members who have relatives in the CCU, compared to other need dimensions. This study finding was in line with worldwide studies (Alsharari, 2019; Salameh et al., 2020; Kang, Cho & Choi, 2020), where ICU patients' family members identified assurance as their first need and then information. In Malaysia, the finding was congruent with previous studies in Malaysia's universities and public hospitals (Liew et al., 2018; Dharmalingam et al., 2016; Zainah et al., 2016; Akhlak & Shdaifat, 2016). This is because emotional support and understanding their loved one's condition are crucial factors in managing their own anxiety, coping with the situation, and making informed choices. However, there were different findings when compared to the earliest observation of ICU patients' family needs in Malaysia, where the need for proximity was identified as the second most pressing need after the need for assurances in a public hospital in the northern region of Malaysia (Hashim & Hussin, 2012). However, it is important to note that the specific needs of family members can vary depending on individual circumstances, cultural factors, and personal preferences. Thus, nurses are suggested to elucidate the specific needs identified by family members in the CCU to deliver more targeted and effective interventions, ultimately enhancing the overall care experience for patients and their families.


The uncertainty and anxiety of family members about loved ones' conditions and prognosis and their unfamiliarity with the CCU environment demand the need for assurance and information. Both important needs are expected among family members who have relatives in CCU. The policy in almost all CCUs is that family members are not relied upon to provide care compared to open wards. Meeting ICU family needs can be addressed by supporting and involving families in the care of critically ill family members (Azoulay et al., 2003). The participation of family members in caregiving, decision-making, and ICU rounds helps establish communication and trusting relationships between family and HCP (Yoo & Shim, 2021). Facilitating effective communication and interacting in supportive ways by HCPs assists family members to understand the overall picture of the patient's situation, decreases CCU patients' family members' anxiety and stress, increases family members' sense of confidence, lessens the sense of guilt when making surrogate decisions, and prevents family members misconceptions about HCPs (Wong et al., 2015; Hutchison et al., 2016). This is in line with the patient-family-centered approach, which recognises that patients, families, and staff are vital to the delivery of better healthcare (Frakking et al., 2020).


In addition, this study's finding suggests there is no significant correlation between assurance, support, comfort, proximity, and information dimensions with CCU patients' family age, gender, and past family experience in the CCU. In contrast, a study conducted at the University Hospital in East Malaysia demonstrated a negative and significant relationship between the assurance dimension and age (Dharmalingam et al., 2016) and a significant association between gender and support needs among family members in the critical care unit at one of the University Hospitals in Kuala Lumpur (Zainah et al., 2016). Although there may not be a correlation between demographic factors or past familial experience and these specific need dimensions, it is essential to recognise that there are individual differences. Each family member may have unique preferences and coping mechanisms, and nurses, as healthcare providers, should still assess and address these individual needs.


The insignificant correlation between the CCFNI-M dimension and family group age, gender, and experience waiting for the patient in the CCU shown in this study suggests that family members play equal responsibility and that there is no effect on their support in supporting their relative in the CCU. They are likely to prioritise meeting the needs of their critically ill relatives compared to their own (Alsharari, 2019). Brookes et al. (2019) state that families understand the importance of their role in supporting their loved ones in the CCU and are equally dedicated to fulfilling that responsibility, irrespective of their personal characteristics. This also illustrates a strong and positive family relationship in Malaysian culture; each family member plays an important role in supporting their critically ill relative. Thus, this study's findings contribute valuable insights to nursing practice, emphasising the importance of recognising and respecting the integral role of families in the CCU setting.


CONCLUSION


The study concludes that family members ranked assurance and information as two of their top priorities. The study's strength was expanding the body of knowledge on CCU patients' family needs, particularly in the Malaysian setting, which might help future research develop a strategy for strengthening patient- and family-centered care. One of the limitations is that the study employed a convenience sampling technique with an inability to generalise to the population. The study focused on a single center where most of the study population was Malay and Muslim. Therefore, the study's findings did not cover CCU patients' family needs among other ethnicities, cultures, and beliefs in Malaysia. Future research in this area should adopt a multi-centred approach to examining the needs of family members in Malaysian CCUs. Triangulation in methodology and data sources is suggested for an in-depth understanding of family needs in CCUs. Incorporating perspectives from multiple CCUs across different regions in Malaysia and utilising diverse data sources such as surveys, interviews, and observations can help researchers gain comprehensive insights into the diverse needs and experiences of family members in CCUs. In conclusion, recognising and addressing the needs of family members of critical care unit patients is crucial for providing comprehensive care and support. By prioritising their needs and offering tailored support, nurses can contribute to better patient outcomes and improved family well-being.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT


The authors would like to express our deepest appreciation to the Malaysian Ministry of Health (MOH), which granted us the data- collection process in the related healthcare center. A special thanks to all Critical Care Unit patients' family members in the ICU, CCU, and ASW in HSNZ who are voluntarily involved in the study.


REFERENCES

Abdul Halain, A., Tang, L. Y., Chong, M. C., Ibrahim, N. A., & Abdullah, K. L. (2022). Psychological distress among the family members of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 31(5-6), 497-507.https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15962

Akhlak, S., & Shdaifat, E. (2016). Needs of families with a relative in a Critical Care Unit. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 16(3), 75-81.https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11125

Alsharari, A. F. (2019). The needs of family members of patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Patient Preference and Adherence, 465-473. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S197769


Azoulay, É., Pochard, F., Chevret, S., Arich, C., Brivet, F., Brun, F., ... & French Famirea Group. (2003). Family participation in care to the critically ill: opinions of families and staff. Intensive Care Medicine, 29, 1498-1504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1904-y

Barth, A. A., Weigel, B. D., Dummer, C. D., Machado, K. C., & Tisott, T. M. (2016). Stressors in the relatives of patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, 28, 323-329. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20160055

Björk, K., Lindahl, B., & Fridh, I. (2019). Family members’ experiences of waiting in intensive care: a concept analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 33(3), 522-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12660

Brookes, O., Brown, C., Tarrant, C., Archer, J., Buckley, D., Buckley, L. M., ... & Bion, J. (2019). Patient experience and reflective learning (PEARL): a mixed methods protocol for staff insight development in acute and intensive care medicine in the UK. BMJ Open, 9(7), e030679. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030679


Davidson J. E. (2009). Family-centered care: meeting the needs of patients' families and helping families adapt to critical illness. Critical Care Nurse, 29(3), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2009611


Dharmalingam, T. K., Kamaluddin, M. R., & Hassan, S. K. (2016). Factorial validation and psychometric properties establishment of Malay version critical care family need inventory. IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v15i1.407


Dharmalingam, T., Kamaluddin, M., Hassan, S., & Zaini, R. (2016). The needs of Malaysian family members of critically ill patients treated in intensive care unit, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 12(2), 9-17. https://medic.upm.edu.my/upload/dokumen/FKUSK1_MJMHS_V2_NO2_2.pdf


Dijkstra, B. M., Felten-Barentsz, K. M., van der Valk, M. J., Pelgrim, T., van der Hoeven, H. G., Schoonhoven, L., ... & Vloet, L. C. (2023). Family participation in essential care activities: Needs, perceptions, preferences, and capacities of intensive care unit patients, relatives, and healthcare providers—An integrative review. Australian Critical Care, 36(3), 401-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2022.02.003


Frakking, T., Michaels, S., Orbell-Smith, J., & Le Ray, L. (2020). Framework for patient, family-centred care within an Australian Community Hospital: development and description. BMJ Open Quality, 9(2), e000823. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000823

Hashim, F., & Hussin, R. (2012). Family needs of patient admitted to intensive care unit in a public hospital. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 103-111.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.012

Hutchison, P. J., McLaughlin, K., Corbridge, T., Michelson, K. N., Emanuel, L., Sporn, P. H., & Crowley-Matoka, M. (2016). Dimensions and role-specific mediators of surrogate trust in the ICU. Critical Care Medicine, 44(12), 2208. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001957

Iglesias, J., Martín, J., Alcañiz, M., Ezquiaga, E., & Vega, G. (2022). The Psychological Impact on Relatives of Critically Ill Patients: The Influence of Visiting Hours. Critical Care Explorations, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000625

Josepha op’t, S. A. J., Dautzenberg, M., Eskes, A. M., Vermeulen, H., & Vloet, L. C. M. (2020). The experiences and needs of relatives of intensive care unit patients during the transition from the intensive care unit to a general ward: a qualitative study. Australian Critical Care, 33(6), 526-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2020.01.004

Kang, J., Cho, Y. J., & Choi, S. (2020). State anxiety, uncertainty in illness, and needs of family members of critically ill patients and their experiences with family-centered multidisciplinary rounds: A mixed model study. PloS One, 15(6), e0234296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234296

Kotfis, K., Olusanya, S., & Modra, L. (2024). Equity in patient care in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Medicine, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07310-6

Koukouli, S., Lambraki, M., Sigala, E., Alevizaki, A., & Stavropoulou, A. (2018). The experience of Greek families of critically ill patients: Exploring their needs and coping strategies. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 45, 44-51.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2017.12.001

Liew, S. L., Dharmalingam, T. K., Ganapathy, G. K., Muniandy, R. K., Johnny, N. G. U., & Lily, N. G. (2018). Need domains of family members of critically-ill patients: A Borneo perspective. Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences, 12(2), 27-33.https://doi.org/10.51200/bjms.v12i2.1222

Marshall, J. C., Bosco, L., Adhikari, N. K., Connolly, B., Diaz, J. V., Dorman, T., ... & Zimmerman, J. (2017). What is an intensive care unit? A report of the task force of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Journal of Critical Care, 37, 270-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.07.015

Mitchell, M. L., Coyer, F., Kean, S., Stone, R., Murfield, J., & Dwan, T. (2016). Patient, family- centred care interventions within the adult ICU setting: An integrative review. Australian Critical Care, 29(4), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2016.08.002

Moss, K. O., Douglas, S. L., Baum, E., & Daly, B. (2019). Family surrogate decision-making in chronic critical illness: A qualitative analysis. Critical Care Nurse, 39(3), e18-e26. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2019176

Rückholdt, M., Tofler, G. H., Randall, S., & Buckley, T. (2019). Coping by family members of critically ill hospitalised patients: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 97, 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.016

Salameh, B. S. S., Basha, S. S. S., Eddy, L. L., Judeh, H. S., & Toqan, D. R. (2020). Essential care needs for patients' family members at the intensive care units in Palestine. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 25(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_9_19

Valle, M., & Lohne, V. (2021). The significance of hope as experienced by the next of kin to critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 35(2), 521-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12864

Wong, P., Liamputtong, P., Koch, S., & Rawson, H. (2015). Families’ experiences of their interactions with staff in an Australian intensive care unit (ICU): a qualitative study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 31(1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2014.06.005

Yoo, H. J., & Shim, J. (2021). The effect of a multifaceted family participation program in an adult cardiovascular surgery ICU. Critical Care Medicine, 49(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004694


Zainah, M., Sasikala, M., Nurfarieza, M. A., & Ho, S. (2016). Needs of family members of critically ill patients in a critical care unit at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre. Medicine and Health, 11(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.17845/MH.2016.1101.03