Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Motivation Levels Among Nursing Students at the College of Nursing, University of Mosul, Iraq

Mohanned Khaleel Abdullah1, Sahir Mallaah1, Osama Ismael Almushhadany2, Radhwan Hussein Ibrahim3*, Raghad Saad Jassim3

1College of Nursing, University of Mosul, 85H2+VCM City of Mosul, Iraq 3College of Medicine, Ninevah University, 41001 City of Mosul, Iraq 3College of Nursing, Ninevah University, 41001 City of Mosul, Iraq

*Corresponding Author’s Email: prof.dr.radhwan@uomosul.edu.iq

ABSTRACT

Aims: The objective of this study was to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced the motivation levels of nursing students. Design: A descriptive study design was implemented with nursing students enrolled at the College of Nursing, University of Mosul, Iraq. Methods: The study included a sample of 260 students. Data collection was carried out using personal information forms and Motivation Sources and Problems Scale. An online survey method was employed to collect data between May 1st and May 31st, 2020. The collected data were analyzed using various statistical measures, including frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, student t-test, and ANOVA test, performed with the SPSS 25.0 program. Results: It was found that 79.1% (n = 125) of the students were positively affected and 52.5% (n = 83) were negatively affected. The intrinsic motivation scores of the students were 43.55±8.71, extrinsic motivation scores were 21.36±3.71, negative motivation scores were 26.91±5.67, and total motivation scores were found to be 92.15±12.77. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected the students' level of motivation. A good strategic plan and a comparative study between distance education and face-to-face education are recommended to increase the level of motivation among nursing students.

Keywords: COVID-19; Intrinsic; Extrinsic; Nursing; Motivation

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, a number of factors have had a significant impact on nursing students' motivation levels (Mccain et al., 2022; Younis, 2023; Ibrahim et al., 2023; Khadyer & Ahmed, 2023; Saeed & Al-Jubouri, 2023). The abrupt transition to remote learning and potential complications associated with clinical placements have amplified stress and anxiety among students (Idris et al., 2021). Working in high-pressure, fast-paced environments, such as hospitals, can also contribute to student demotivation (Kaku et al., 2022). Mental health is another significant factor affecting motivation levels in nursing students (Son et al., 2020). It is also noteworthy to mention that feelings of isolation and uncertainty can lead to hopelessness and helplessness, further hindering student motivation and engagement in their studies (Michel et al., 2021; Masha'al et al., 2020; Noori et al., 2023). The world continues to grapple with the significant aftermath of the COVID- 19 pandemic (Inovasanti et al., 2023).

The significance of studying the impact of COVID-19 on the motivation levels of nursing students is multifaceted. Firstly, understanding the extent to which the pandemic has affected nursing students' motivation can help educators and administrators develop strategies to support and engage students during this challenging time. It may also inform the development of policies and procedures to ensure that students are able to complete their education despite the challenges posed by the pandemic. Secondly, studying the impact of COVID-19 on nursing students' motivation can provide insight into the broader effects of the pandemic on the healthcare workforce. The nursing profession is essential to the functioning of the healthcare system and ensuring that students are motivated and engaged in their education is crucial to ensuring that the future workforce is well- prepared to meet the needs of patients. Thirdly, this study can help to understand the mental health of nursing students during the pandemic. It will provide insight into the psychological effects of the pandemic on this group of people, which can inform the development of mental health support and resources for nursing students. The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated changes imposed psychological burdens on nursing students. Nursing instructors balance between selecting appropriate teaching methods and providing support for their students' mental well-being (Kishore, Kunjukunju, & Yusof, 2022). Even if COVID-19 is no longer a pandemic, the lessons learned from this global health crisis can inform future preparedness efforts for healthcare professionals. Not all nurses' job performance is negatively affected by psychological impacts, often because they have effective coping skills (Priyantini, Irawandi, & Poddar, 2022). Understanding the impact of the pandemic on nursing students' motivation can contribute to refining strategies for preparing and supporting future nursing cohorts during challenging times. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on students' motivation levels.

METHODOLOGY

Study Design and Participants

In this study, a descriptive research design was employed to gather information about nursing students enrolled at the College of Nursing, University of Mosul, Iraq. The primary objective of this research design is to describe and document the characteristics, attitudes, or behaviors of the population under investigation without altering or manipulating any variables. In this case, the entire population of nursing students at the college (360 students) was invited to participate, and 260 students chose to take part in the study. The fact that all students who participated are from the same college indicates a high degree of internal representativeness. It can be assumed that the findings are likely representative of the characteristics and attitudes of nursing students within this specific college.

Data Collection

Data collection was conducted through an online survey administered between May 1st and May 31st, 2020. The research team developed a personal information form based on relevant literature, which included questions regarding students' gender, age, grade, and various factors related to their education. The Motivation Sources and Problems Scale, consisting of 24 questions, was used to assess students' motivation levels. This scale, developed by Acat and Köşgeroğlu, in 2006, comprises three sub-dimensions: "Intrinsic Motivation," "External Motivation," and "Negative Motivation." Participants provided their responses using a 5-point Likert scale.

Scoring and Analysis

The scale items related to intrinsic and extrinsic motivation were scored on a scale of 1 to 5, with "I strongly disagree" assigned a score of 1 and "I strongly agree" assigned a score of 5. For the items related to negative motivation, the scoring was reversed, with "I strongly disagree" receiving a score of 5 and "I strongly agree" receiving a score of 1. The scale yielded a minimum score of 24 and a maximum score of 120, with the higher scores indicating higher levels of motivation. Acat & Köşgeroğlu (2006), reported the internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) for the scale as being 0.82, but this study found it to be 0.86. The data were analyzed using the SPSS 25.0 program, including descriptive tests such as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. Content analysis was performed to categorize students' statements regarding their motivation. Student's t-test and ANOVA were employed to explore motivational differences based on students' sociodemographic characteristics.

Ethical Consideration

The study obtained permission from the Ethics Committee of Ninevah University, Iraq with the approval No. CCRME-Med-20-36 on the 18th of October 2022.

RESULTS

It was observed that the mean age of the students was 20.44±2.60 years. Among all, 47.7 % (n = 124) were female, and 52.3 % (n = 136) were male. It was determined that 77.3% (n = 201) had chosen the profession willingly, and 22.7% (n = 59) of students didn’t choose the profession willingly. It was found that 38.1% (n = 99) of the students were positively affected and 61.9% (n

= 161) were negatively affected (p>0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1: Findings Regarding the Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Students (n:260)


n

%

Gender

Female

195

75

Male

65

25


Grade

1

98

37.6

2

63

24.2

3

44

16.9

4

55

21.2

Willingly Choosing a Profession

Yes

201

77.3

No

59

22.7


Influencing Motivation

Yes

211

81.2

No

49

18.8


Motivational Aspect

Positive

99

38.1

Negative

161

61.9


The higher percentage of students reporting a negative impact suggests potential challenges or issues within the educational environment or program being studied. These challenges could relate to teaching methods, curriculum design, student support, or other factors that need attention and improvement. The intrinsic motivation scores of the students were 43.55±8.71, extrinsic motivation scores were 21.36±3.71, negative motivation scores were 26.91±5.67, and total motivation scores were found to be 92.15±12.77 (Table 2).

Table 2: Distribution of Students' Scores on Motivation Resources and Problems Scale and its Sub- Dimensions


Study Dimensions

Min-Max

Mean ±SD

Intrinsic Motivation

11-55

43.55±8.71

Extrinsic motivation

5-29

21.36±3.71

Negative Motivation

14-40

26.91±5.67

Total Motivation

57-120

92.15±12.77

Min-Max: Minimum- Maximum, Mean: Mean, SD: Standard Deviation


It was observed that intrinsic, extrinsic, and negative motivation levels did not differ according to the variables of choosing the profession willingly and influencing motivation. It was also observed that students’ intrinsic motivation differs according to gender, extrinsic motivation differs according to grade and motivation direction, and negative motivation differs according to age, class, and motivation direction (p>0.05) (Table 4).

Table 3: Distribution of the Scores Obtained from the Motivation Sources and Problems Scale and its Sub-Dimensions According to the Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Students



Variables


n

Intrinsic Motivation

Mean±SD

Extrinsic Motivation Mean±SD

Negative Mean±SD

Total Mean±SD

Gender

Female

195

44.91±38.73

21.91±3.13

26.80±5.42

93.62±12.00

Male

65

38.73±11.35

19.38±4.89

27.11±6.56

86.76±14.35

t

5.231

3.001

3.589

0.644

p

0.024*

0.085

0.060

0.423


Age

18-20

149

44.10±8.56

21.73±3.51

25.59±5.08

92.03±12.25

21-23

96

43.07±9.01

21.03±3.87

28.18±5.92

92.29±13.31

24 and above

15

41.00±8.10

19.71±4.34

31.57±5.94

92.28±16.12

F

0.566

1.392

6.775

0.008

p

0.569

0.252

0.002**

0.992


Grade

1

98

43.49±8.78

21.10±3.79

26.75±5.23

91.35±12.67

2

63

41.23±11.33

20.00±4.93

24.80±5.16

87.76±14.16

3

44

46.38±6.57

23.03±2.16

26.92±6.54

96.34±12.80

4

55

43.55±6.47

21.89±238

29.48±5.71

94.93±10.06

F

1.646

3.599

3.554

2.753

p

0.181

0.015*

0.016*

0.045


Table 4: Distribution of Students' Scores from the Motivation Sources and Problem Scales and its Sub-Dimensions According to their Sociodemographic Characteristics



n

Intrinsic Motivation

Mean ±SD

Extrinsic Motivation Mean±SD

Negative Mean ±SD

Total Mean ±SD


Willingly Choosing a Profession

Yes

(201)

(49.1±0,29)

(20.54±2.15)

(26.33±4.02)

(95.72±9.50)

No

(59)

(37.56±9.19)

(22.10±2.64)

(24.87±4,65)

84.32±1.89)

t

(0.948)

(1.051)

(0.649)

(0.341)

Ρ

(0.724)

(0.794)

(0.374)

(0.381)


Influencing Motivation

Yes

(211)

(43.56±8.38)

(21.16±3.88)

(27.19±5.77)

(93.6±37.63)

No

(49)

(43.48±10.00)

(22.09±2.90)

(25.84±523)

(91.42±13.81)

t

(1.643)

(0.514)

(0.158)

(0.440)

Ρ

(0.202)

(0.475)

(0.691)

(0.508)


Motivation Aspect***

Positive

(99)

(43.89±9.28)

(21.62±2.97)

(27.28±6.02)

(93.00±12.19)

Negative

(112)

(43.68±8.68)

(20.66±4.87)

(27.10±4.32)

(92.60±13,58)

t

(0.014)

(8.412)

(5.913)

(0.555)

Ρ

(0.906)

(0.004**)

(0.017*)

(0.458)

t: Student's t-test, F: Anova, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, Mean: Mean, SD: Standard Deviation, *** Obtained by categorizing the students' self-reports.


DISCUSSION

The present study was planned to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the motivation level of nursing students. The findings were discussed under different dimensions and three sub-dimensions, including intrinsic, extrinsic, and negative levels of motivation. It is observed from the present study that the pandemic has negatively affected the motivational level of students by practicing distance education and staying away from the laboratory and clinical environment. It highlights the need for institutions to provide robust mental health support services for students engaged in online learning. Feelings of isolation and disconnection can adversely affect motivation, so addressing these issues is crucial. Teachers and instructors may need additional training and professional development opportunities to effectively transition from traditional classroom teaching to online instruction. This can help deliver more engaging and motivating online courses. Students prefer formal education provided the conditions are favorable post-pandemic (Yilmaz Ince et al., 2020).

The possibility that the negative impact observed in the study is a reflection of the broader trends and challenges in education due to the pandemic, which were observed in other studies as well, Laboratory practices and clinical experiences are of great importance in the practical part of nursing education. It is also observed that theoretical knowledge without its practical implementation is one of the main reasons for low motivation. In contrast to this study, Nielsen and Dieperink et al. (2020) reported that during the COVID-19 pandemic, nurses were highly motivated to care for critical patients and to acquire new skills whenever necessary.

Though there were students whose motivation was positive towards their education, which may be due to their understanding of the importance and well-accepted social image of their profession (Schaufeli & Peeters, 2000), It is an expected result that the motivation level of the students who have completed their studies and are working has increased during the pandemic. Students presently studying during the Corona pandemic did not find a suitable environment to convert their basic knowledge into professional skills; this may be the reason for their decreased level of motivation. These results were supported another stud), which reported that 37.9% of students' motivation level was moderate and 5.2% was low during the COVID-19 pandemic (Lee et al., 2020). When the score of the students on the motivation sources and problems scale was evaluated, it was seen that their intrinsic, extrinsic, and total motivation levels were high, and their negative motivation levels were found to be moderate. It was supported by other findings that reported that students' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation was high, while their negative motivation was moderate (Yardimci et al., 2017).

So, the reason for the high average score of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation level can again be correlated with the importance of the nursing profession during the COVID-19 pandemic (Legault, 2020; Noels et al., 1999; Tarquinio et al., 2020). It is also observed that the high level of intrinsic motivation score, as in similar studies, is due to the positive thoughts of the students about the profession and their interest in applying knowledge and skills to professional practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study also reveals that the scores of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations of third-grade students were higher than those of other grades. In another study, it was found that the extrinsic and intrinsic motivation mean scores of the 4th grade students were higher than those of the 1st grade, and the mean negative motivation scores of the 1st grade students were higher than those of the 4th grade students (Noels et al., 1999). The low score of intrinsic and external motivation among 1st grade students is due to the transition from the physical classroom to the digital education system. It can also be said that as basic nursing skills and environment adaptation are taught to 1st grade students, which they don’t find interesting through the online education system, this may be one of the reasons for their lack of motivation. The sources of extrinsic motivation are important in improving nursing students' motivation, and strategies for improving their motivation should be adopted (Chen et al., 2019).

It is also important to mention the contrast, which found that the mean score of extrinsic motivation of the 3rd grade students was significantly lower than that of the 1st and 2nd grades (Alharbi et al., 2019). It is evident from the above discussion that the motivation level of the students has been negatively affected during the COVID-19 pandemic, and for continuing the teaching-learning process with distance education, it is important to make the necessary arrangements and initiatives to improve the motivation positively (Alharbi et al., 2019).

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of the present study, it can be concluded that distance education during the Covid-19 pandemic had a negative impact on students' motivation. However, an increase in motivation was observed when students exhibited a higher level of respect for the nursing profession. Considering these results, it is recommended to conduct further research with a larger sample size to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the influence of the Covid-19 pandemic on students' motivation levels. Additionally, it is crucial to explore various motivating resources that can assist students in maintaining their motivation during the challenging circumstances of the pandemic. By conducting such studies and identifying effective strategies to boost motivation, educational institutions can better support students in achieving their academic goals and promoting their overall well-being during times of crisis.

Limitations of the Study

The article's limitation lies in its failure to investigate the motivation level of nursing students in the current non-pandemic scenario, leading to an incomplete understanding of the factors influencing nursing education and the nursing profession. Motivation plays a pivotal role in shaping students' attitudes and commitment to their studies and future careers, and neglecting this aspect hinders the comprehensiveness and applicability of the study. Additionally, the absence of contextual understanding limits the relevance of the study's recommendations to nursing schools and policymakers.

Furthermore, the long-term impact of the pandemic on nursing students' motivation and mental well-being may persist, and the article's oversight may lead to overlooking the need for continued support to address post-pandemic challenges. Understanding the current motivation levels of nursing students is crucial for assessing the healthcare workforce's readiness for future crises and designing effective educational strategies and support systems. Without considering students' motivation, the article's recommendations may not fully address the nuanced needs of the nursing community, hindering the identification of areas for improvement and best practices. To address this limitation, future research should explore nursing students' motivation post-pandemic, providing valuable insights into nursing education and healthcare workforce preparedness.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to extend their appreciation to the Dean of the Nursing College for their support and cooperation throughout the research process. Their assistance in facilitating data collection and providing necessary resources is greatly appreciated. The authors would like to

thank the nursing students who willingly participated in this study. Their active involvement and honest responses were crucial in generating meaningful insights into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student motivation. Without their cooperation, this study would not have been possible.

REFERENCES

Acat, M. B., & Kösgeroglu, N. (2006). Güdülenme Kaynaklari ve Sorunlari Ölçegi/Motivation's Resources and Problems Scale. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 7(4), 204. https://www.proquest.com/openview/5894e7fff9bf68ede2f76634bcb16820/1?pq- origsite=gscholar&cbl=136214. Accessed on 12th May, 2022.

Alharbi, M., McKenna, L., & Whittall, D. (2019). Social barriers experienced by female Saudi nursing students while studying nursing: A phenomenological study. Nurse Education in Practice, 34, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.11.018

Chen, X., Sun, M., Wu, D., & Song, X. Y. (2019). Information-sharing behavior on WeChat moments: the role of anonymity, familiarity, and intrinsic motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2540. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02540

Ibrahim, P. K., Hassan, Y. Y., Mohammed, G. H., Abdullah, O. S., & Hamarash, M. Q. (2023). Life Status of Iraqi Students Studying in Iran during Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. Mosul Journal of Nursing, 11(1), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.33899/mjn.2023.177461

Inovasanti, A., Susanna, D., Poddar, S., Hermawati, E., & Kusuma, A. (2023). Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour of college students in disposing used masks during the COVID-19 pandemic in DKI Jakarta Province. F1000Research, 12, 511. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.130691.1

Idris, F., Zulkipli, I. N., Abdul-Mumin, K. H., Ahmad, S. R., Mitha, S., Rahman, H. A., ... & Naing, L. (2021). Academic experiences, physical and mental health impact of COVID-19 pandemic on students and lecturers in health care education. BMC Medical Education, 21, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02968-2

Lee, J. X., Ahmad Azman, A. H., Ng, J. Y., & Ismail, N. A. S. (2020). Reflection of connectivism in medical education and learning motivation during COVID-19. MedRxiv, 2020-07. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.07.20147918

Kaku, S. M., McVey, A. J., Gerber, A. H., Pretzsch, C. M., Jones, D. R., Kodakkadan, F. M., & Poulsen, R. E. (2022). Experiences of student and trainee autism researchers during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Autism Research, 15(3), 413-420.https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2662

Khadyer, A. Y., & Ahmed, S. A. (2023). Evaluation of nurses' practice concerning pulmonary rehabilitation to remove secretions from the lungs of a person infected with covid-19. Mosul Journal of Nursing, 11(2), 282-290. 10.33899/mjn.2023.180104

Kishore, T., Kunjukunju, A., & Yusof, P. (2022). Adapting to COVID-19 pandemic: a critical literature review of the psychological impact among nursing students. The Malaysian Journal of Nursing (MJN), 13(4), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.31674/mjn.2022.v13i04.012

Legault, L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 2416-2419. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1139

Masha'al, D., Rababa, M., & Shahrour, G. (2020). Distance learning-related stress among undergraduate nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Nursing Education, 59(12), 666-674. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20201118-03

Mccain, S., Ward, D., McGoohan, K., Richards, H., Fiore, B., Hakeem, A., & Prasad, K. R. (2022). The Covid-19 Pandemic Has Had a Significant Impact on the Quantity and Quality of Liver Cancer Surgery-Reality or Myth?. HPB: The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 24, S211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2022.05.435

Michel, A., Ryan, N., Mattheus, D., Knopf, A., Abuelezam, N. N., Stamp, K., & Fontenot, H. B. (2021). Undergraduate nursing students' perceptions on nursing education during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: A national sample. Nursing Outlook, 69(5), 903- 912.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2021.05.004

Nielsen, D. S., & Dieperink, K. B. (2020). Cultural perspectives and nurses reactions on the corona pandemic: A critical view from Denmark. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 31(4), 333- 336.https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659620924118

Noels, K. A., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (1999). Perceptions of teachers’ communicative style and students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00003

Noori, A. D., Amen, M. R., & Hamarash, M. Q. (2023). Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception of Nurse Students Regarding Coronavirus Vaccines at the University of Sulaimani. Mosul Journal of Nursing, 11(1), 206-214. https://doi.org/10.33899/mjn.2023.177591

Priyantini, D., Irawandi, D., & Poddar, S. (2022). Psychological Impact of Coping Strategies and Nurse Performance During the Covid-19 Pandemic at Rspal Dr. Ramelan Surabaya. The Malaysian Journal of Nursing (MJN), 14(2), 109-116.https://doi.org/10.31674/mjn.2022.v14i02.018

Saeed, S. M., & Al-Jubouri, M. B. (2023). Nursing Faculty Members' Perception Regarding Wearing Mask and Accepting Coronavirus Vaccines. Mosul Journal of Nursing, 11(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.33899/mjn.2023.176932

Schaufeli, W. B., & Peeters, M. C. (2000). Job stress and burnout among correctional officers: A literature review. International Journal of Stress Management, 7(1), 19-48.https://www.wilmarschaufeli.nl/publications/Schaufeli/133.pdf

Son, C., Hegde, S., Smith, A., Wang, X., & Sasangohar, F. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on college student’s mental health in the United States: Interview survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9), e21279. https://doi.org/10.2196/21279

Tarquinio, C., Brennstuhl, M. J., Rydberg, J. A., Bassan, F., Peter, L., Tarquinio, C. L., & Tarquinio, P. (2020). EMDR in telemental health counseling for healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients: a pilot study. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 42(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2020.1818014

Yardimci, F., Bektaş, M., Özkütük, N., Muslu, G. K., Gerçeker, G. Ö., & Başbakkal, Z. (2017). A study of the relationship between the study process, motivation resources, and motivation problems of nursing students in different educational systems. Nurse Education Today, 48, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.09.017

Yilmaz Ince, E., Kabul, A., & Diler, İ. (2020). Distance education in higher education in the COVID-19 pandemic process: A case of Isparta Applied Sciences University. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 345-351. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.112

Younis, Y. M. (2023). Post Corona Virus Disease-19 Symptoms after recovery of Patients in Erbil City. Mosul Journal of Nursing, 11(1), 149-158.

https://doi.org/10.33899/mjn.2023.1769693899/mjn.2023.176969