Asmaa Gomaa Ragab*, Safaa Ahmed Mohamed Kotb, Rabaa Hamed Hassanein, Hanaa Moukhtar Ibrahim
Faculty of Nursing, Assiut University, Egypt
*Corresponding Author’s Email: asmaagomaa294@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT
Background: Constipation is a preventable and treatable health concern that develops as people age owing to a variety of reasons. Aim: This study evaluates the effect of educational program about dietary and physical activity on functional constipation among elderly. Methods: Quasi-experimental research design was used. This study was conducted in Assiut geriatric clubs. The sample composed of 145 elderly. Four tools were used: 1st tool included three parts: Part (1): Socio demographic characteristic Part (2): Medical history, Part (3): Knowledge about constipation. 2nd tool: Assess the functional constipation in elderly. 3rd tool: Assess Constipation Symptoms. 4th tool: consist of two parts: First part: Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Second part: 3-day food-recall diary, used to assess dietary statues and dietary habits. Results: Mean age of studied elderly was 64.67±2.64, while 94.5% were female. All study elderly in pretest complained about functional constipation, while in post, and follow up test about 9.7% and 51.7 % of them had functional constipation at post and follow up test respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the functional constipation and constipation after drinking water, fenugreek, herbs and soup, eating brown bread and oats and nuts. Conclusion: Functional constipation symptom was severe in elderly which is related to low physical activity also suitable for dietary intake which help in relieving the symptoms of functional constipation. Recommendations: Health education program about functional constipation were effective in improving the outcome of functional constipation criteria by using effective teaching media like videos, role-play, and demonstration.
INTRODUCTION
In 2020, the world's population of people aged 65 years and up will be 727 million, the worldwide population of elderly people is expected to more than double over the next three decades, reaching 1.5 billion in 2050 (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division 2020). Egypt currently has 5.95 million senior persons, with that figure predicted to rise to 18.1 million by 2050 (Central Intelligence Agency, 2018).
Constipation is defined as bowel movements that are difficult, incomplete, or irregular. It is the most common digestive problem that it is considered as a symptom than a disease. It is a public problem among senior persons and may lead to health problems such as urinary retention and overflow incontinence if left untreated (Alimoradzadeh, Mokhtare, & Agah, 2017).
The term "functional constipation" refers to a group of disorders characterized by difficult, infrequent, or seemingly incomplete defecation. The following are the Rome II criteria (2014) for diagnosing constipation (Nour-Eldein et al., 2014; Farahat et al., 2019).
Low fluid intake, less mobile patients, delayed bowel emptying, poor dentition, and the use of a variety of medications, such as antacids, calcium, and iron supplements, as well as radiotherapy and opioid pain relief for cancer treatment. As well as the development of comorbid medical conditions resulting in polypharmacy, are all risk factors for constipation (Susan et al., 2017; Farahat, El-Esrigy, & Salama, 2019).
A nurse's involvement is critical in encouraging the elderly to engage in regular morning activity, such as walking. A caffeinated beverage first thing in the morning can help stimulate colonic function. A high- fiber breakfast, as well as 1.5–2 litres of water per day, are recommended (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2017; Emmanuel et al., 2017). Increased dietary fiber is made up of complex carbohydrate polymers that are poorly digested and pass practically unaltered through the colon (Rao, Yu, & Fedewa, 2015). Constipation should be treated with lifestyle changes first, as they improve general health and quality of life (Emmanuel et al., 2017).
Significance of the Study
According to a population-based study, the elderly had a higher cumulative incidence of chronic constipation (20%) than the younger population. Constipation is more common in older women than it is in men, with female constipation rates being two to three times higher than male constipation rates (Roque & Bouras, 2015).
Aim of the Study: Effect of dietary and physical activity educational program on functional constipation among elderly.
Research Hypotheses:
Hypotheses 0: Training program doesn't improve level of elderly knowledge and practice about functional constipation.
Hypotheses 1: Training program will improve level of elderly knowledge and practice to decrease severity of functional constipation.
METHODOLOGY
Research Design: Quasi-experimental research design was used to carry out this study.
Setting: study was conducted in Assiut Geriatric Clubs namely (Legitimacy Assembly and Islamic Cultural Center).
Sample: The study sample composed of 145 elderly participant aged 60 years and over and suffering from functional constipation based on Rome II criteria (2014) assessment. However, an elderly may have constipation if he/she has two or more symptoms.
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous intestinal surgery
Use of laxatives during this study
Tools of the Study: Four tools were used
Tool (1): Self-administered questioner
Part (I): Used to assess socio demographic characteristic as, age, sex, residence, marital status, income, occupation, and level of education and social activity (El-Gilany, El-Wehady, & M. El-Wasify, 2012).
Part (II): Medical history of elderly as hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerosis and renal failure, cardiovascular disease and medication used.
Tool (2): Used to assess the functional constipation in elderly:
Constipation is diagnosed using the Rome II criteria as follows: At least two of the following symptoms are connected with 25% of bowel movements (straining, hard or lumpy stools, a sense of incomplete evacuation, a sense of anorectal obstruction, the need for manual maneuvers, and fewer than three defecations per week) (Nour-Eldein et al., 2014).
Tool (3): Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) Questionnaire used to assess the self-reported severity of symptoms are absent, mild, moderate, severe, on the 4 Likert scale. The score included 12 items comprising three subscales abdominal (four items), rectal (three items), and stool (five items) (Nour-Eldein et al., 2014).
Tool (4): Part (1): Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) it is brief consisting of 10-item, questionnaire that measures physical activity of the past week.
The frequency of these events is graded as never [0], seldom (1-2 days/week [1]), sometimes (3-4 days/week [2]), and often (5-7 days/week [3]). The length is also graded as less than 1 hour [0], 1 to 2 hours [1], 2 to 4 hours [2], and more than 4 hours a week [3]. The final PASE activity score is calculated by multiplying by an item weight the amount of time spent on each activity (hr./week) (Colleen, 2012).
Part II: 3-day food-recall diary.
Reported data by elderly and some time by elderly family for everything related to eating and drinking for 3 days (2 weekdays and 1 weekend day), including all meals, snacks, and beverages (Vargas-García, &Vargas-Salado, 2013).
Validate of the Tools: The tools were translated to Arabic language and reviewed by five experts in the community and gerontological health nursing to ascertain their validity, for clarity, relevance, comprehensiveness, understanding and applicability.
Reliability: was measured using Cronbachs’ Alpha test on 10% of cases it was 0.887 for knowledge, 0.692 for functional constipation, 0.963 for severity, and 0.668 for physical activities, 0. 741 for diet.
Methods
Administrative phase: Chiefs of geriatric clubs in Assiut city received official agreement permission from the Dean of the Faculty of Nursing. The clearance to conduct the study was provided in this letter, as well as an explanation of the study's goal.
Pilot study: Pilot study was carried out before starting of data collection on 10% of elderly patients in a selected setting to examine the applicability, and clarity of the developed tools. It was not excluded from the study.
Ethical considerations: The Faculty of Nursing's Ethical Committee approved the research proposal on 1st January 2019, at Assiut University. During the implementation of the research, there is no risk to the study subjects. The elderly was reminded that they have the right to withdraw from the study at any time. Confidentiality and anonymity were assured. The study followed common ethical principle in clinical research. Chiefs of geriatric clubs were given an explanation of the research's goal.
Data Collection: The purpose of the study was clarified to studied elderly to gain their cooperation before starting data collection. The study started from the beginning of September to the end of February 2020. The dietary and physical activity program was done on the elderly participants (145). The data was collected 3 days per week at evening time from 7 pm to 11 pm and it repeated for each group and consisted of 4-5 participants, the interview questionnaire was filled by the researchers. The educational program was involved 3 sessions each session took one to one and half hours. The 1st session included assessment of the functional constipation. The 2nd session included explanation of healthy balanced diet, adequate fluid intake, and regular walking required to improve constipation. The 3rd session included explanation of the lifestyle change (importance of regular bowel habits, best position for defecation, alternative medication and an indication of laxative use).
Statistical Analysis: The obtained data were reviewed, prepared for computer entry, coded, analyzed, and tabulated. Descriptive statistic (percentages, means and standard deviations) were done using computer program SPSS version 26. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to compare means. Tests of significance used were F test and Chi-square test P. Value is significant at P<0.05 and highly significant at P<0.01.
RESULTS
Items | No. (n=145) | % |
Age/(years): | ||
- 60 -< 65 | 73 | 50.3 |
- 65 -< 70 | 68 | 46.9 |
- ≥70 | 4 | 2.8 |
Mean ± SD | 64.67±2.64 | |
Sex: | ||
- Male | 8 | 5.5 |
- Female | 137 | 94.5 |
Marital Status: | ||
- Married | 83 | 57.2 |
- Widow | 60 | 41.4 |
- Divorced | 2 | 1.4 |
Level of Education: | ||
- Primary education | 14 | 9.6 |
- Preparatory education | 10 | 6.9 |
- Secondary (general & technical of 3 or 5 years) | 90 | 62.1 |
- University graduate | 31 | 21.4 |
Past Occupation: | ||
- Non-working/ housewife | 34 | 23.4 |
- Employee | 103 | 71.1 |
- Technical | 8 | 5.5 |
Residence: | ||
- Rural | 4 | 2.8 |
- Urban | 141 | 97.2 |
Family income: | ||
- Just meet routine expenses | 63 | 43.5 |
- Able to save/invest money | 82 | 56.5 |
Living with: | ||
- Alone | 42 | 29.0 |
- With their family | 103 | 71.0 |
Social Level: | ||
- Low | 28 | 19.3 |
- Middle | 72 | 49.7 |
- High | 45 | 31.0 |
Table 1 Illustrated that 50.3% of the studied sample were aged between 60-<65 years, with mean ±S.D. 64.67±2.64. About 94.5% and 97.2% of them were female and from urban area. Also showed that 62.1%, secondary education. And 71.0 % of them lived with their family, while less than half (49.7%) of the studied elderly have middle socioeconomic level.
Figure 1 showed that 57.0% of studied elderly had history of hypertension while 1.4% of them had atherosclerosis.
Figure 2 revealed that 100.0%, 9.7% and 51.7% had functional constipation at pre, post, and follow up test respectively, and highly statistically significant difference between pre, post, and follow up with P- value=0.000.
The present study showed that more than half of studied elderly had severe symptoms of constipation at pretest there is no symptoms in posttest.
Items | Pre (n = 145) | Post (n = 145) | Follow up (n = 145) | F | P - value |
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
Sitting activities | 4.34±1.26 | 4.30±1.20 | 4.20±1.19 | 0.486 | 0.615 |
Sitting activities time | 1.52±0.943 | 1.37±0.889 | 1.47±0.928 | 1.009 | 0.365 |
Walking activities | 0.14±0.384 | 1.33±0.882 | 0.92±0.795 | 102.467 | 0.001** |
Walking time | 0.01±.117 | 0.07±.254 | 0.04±.260 | 2.266 | 0.105 |
Light activities | 2.35±1.83 | 2.86±1.70 | 2.34±1.65 | 4.367 | 0.013** |
Light activities time | 0.94±0.643 | 0.96±0.676 | 0.91±0.600 | 0.219 | 0.804 |
Moderate activities | 3.24±1.25 | 3.46±1.56 | 3.28±1.40 | 0.995 | 0.370 |
Moderate activities time | 1.86±0.773 | 1.74±0.815 | 1.70±0.792 | 1.418 | 0.243 |
Strenuous activities | 0.08±0.43 | 0.06±0.43 | 0.08±0.38 | 0.053 | 0.949 |
Strenuous activities Time | 0.00±0.000 | 0.00±0.000 | 0.00±0.000 | - | - |
Muscle strength activities | 0.04±0.19 | 1.31±1.02 | 0.67±0.73 | 107.511 | 0.001** |
Muscle strength activities time | 0.00±0.000 | 0.03±0.164 | 0.03±0.164 | 2.043 | 0.131 |
Household activity | 6.80±0.829 | 6.78±0.883 | 6.75±0.876 | 0.086 | 0.917 |
** P Value is significant at P<0.05
Table 2 displayed mean and standard deviation that showed statistically significant difference regarding, walking, light and muscle strength activities at pre, and follow up test with p- value=0.000.
Items | Pre (n = 145) | Post (n = 145) | Follow up (n = 145) | F | P - value |
Mean ± Std. Deviation | Mean ± Std. Deviation | Mean ± Std. Deviation | |||
Food Help to Prevent Functional Constipation | |||||
- Green Fruit or Vegetable | 65.77±63.23 | 148.89±106.30 | 160.20±87.29 | 50.474 | 0.001** |
- Fenugreek, Herbs and Soup | 28.27±34.54 | 146.20±119.16 | 117.01±101.54 | 63.841 | 0.001** |
- Brown Bread | 142.70±32.05 | 132.01±36.95 | 149.01±39.42 | 8.138 | 0.001** |
- Oats, Nuts | 3.82±8.07 | 32.62±18.01 | 21.59±16.27 | 140.173 | 0.001** |
- Honey | 2.68±6.77 | 0.82±2.35 | 0.4138±1.382 | 11.992 | 0.001** |
-Cocked Vegetables | 79.71±44.92 | 109.00±116.12 | 129.74±113.00 | 9.722 | 0.001** |
- Water | 896.45±233.33 | 129.02±212.33 | 982.75±163.87 | 150.518 | 0.001** |
Food it Helps the Occurrence of Constipation | |||||
- Caffeine Drinks | 292.55±163.83 | 90.34±86.52 | 94.71±81.61 | 141.584 | 0.001** |
- Milk Products | 140.79±69.08 | 159.96±78.24 | 146.65±77.01 | 2.495 | 0.084 |
- Fried Food and Crackers | 9.03±15.85 | 5.44±11.05 | 8.34±16.48 | 2.440 | 0.088 |
- Rice or Pasta | 64.66±47.39 | 40.10±39.16 | 33.63±34.81 | 23.355 | 0.001** |
- White Bread | 41.95±41.85 | 6.89±15.16 | 9.8851±13.95 | 75.489 | 0.001** |
** P Value is significant at P<0.05
Table 3 Cleared highly statistically significant different regarding all types of foods that help in the prevention of constipation during last three days with P Value =0.000 at pre, post and follow up test. While concerned foods that help occurrence of constipation showed significant difference with P Value =0.000 at pre, post and follow up test.
Food helps to prevent constipation | Functional constipation(n=145) | X2 | P-value | ||||
No constipation | constipation | ||||||
No. | % | No. | % | ||||
Water | |||||||
Pre | less than recommended | 0 | 0.0 | 95 | 65.5 | 41.908 | 0.001** |
recommended amount | 0 | 0.0 | 50 | 34.5 | |||
Post | less than recommended | 22 | 15.2 | 8 | 5.5 | ||
recommended amount | 109 | 75.2 | 6 | 4.1 | |||
Follow up | less than recommended | 46 | 31.7 | 49 | 33.8 | ||
recommended amount | 24 | 16.6 | 26 | 17.9 | |||
Green Fruit or Vegetable | |||||||
Pre | less than recommended | 0 | 0.0 | 145 | 100.0 | 3.396 | 0.065 |
Post | less than recommended | 122 | 84.1 | 11 | 7.6 | ||
recommended amount | 9 | 6.2 | 3 | 2.1 | |||
Follow up | less than recommended | 68 | 46.9 | 73 | 50.3 | ||
recommended amount | 2 | 1.4 | 2 | 1.4 | |||
Fenugreek, Herbs and Soup | |||||||
Pre | less than recommended | 0 | 0.0 | 145 | 100.0 | 24.975 | 0.001** |
Post | less than recommended | 107 | 73.8 | 10 | 6.9 | ||
recommended amount | 24 | 16.6 | 4 | 2.8 |
Follow up | less than recommended | 58 | 40.0 | 71 | 49.0 | ||
recommended amount | 12 | 8.3 | 4 | 2.8 | |||
Brown Bread | |||||||
Pre | less than recommended | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 4.1 | 20.174 | 0.001** |
recommended amount | 0 | 0.0 | 139 | 95.9 | |||
Post | less than recommended | 28 | 19.3 | 2 | 1.4 | ||
recommended amount | 103 | 71.0 | 12 | 8.3 | |||
Follow up | less than recommended | 10 | 6.9 | 4 | 2.8 | ||
recommended amount | 60 | 41.4 | 71 | 49.0 | |||
Cocked Vegetable | |||||||
Pre | less than recommended | 0 | 0.0 | 36 | 24.8 | 0.581 | 0.446 |
recommended amount | 0 | 0.0 | 109 | 75.2 | |||
Post | less than recommended | 28 | 19.3 | 3 | 2.1 | ||
recommended amount | 103 | 71.0 | 11 | 7.6 | |||
Follow up | less than recommended | 5 | 3.4 | 6 | 4.1 | ||
recommended amount | 65 | 44.8 | 69 | 47.6 | |||
Oats, Nuts | |||||||
Pre | less than recommended | 0 | 0.0 | 145 | 100.0 | 24.555 | 0.001** |
Post | less than recommended | 99 | 68.3 | 11 | 7.6 | ||
recommended amount | 32 | 22.1 | 3 | 2.1 | |||
Follow up | less than recommended | 68 | 46.9 | 71 | 49.0 | ||
recommended amount | 2 | 1.4 | 4 | 2.8 | |||
Honey | |||||||
Pre | less than recommended | 0 | 0.0 | 121 | 83.4 | 2.086 | 0.149 |
recommended amount | 0 | 0.0 | 24 | 16.6 | |||
Post | less than recommended | 115 | 79.3 | 12 | 8.3 | ||
recommended amount | 16 | 11.0 | 2 | 1.4 | |||
Follow up | less than recommended | 66 | 45.5 | 67 | 46.2 | ||
recommended amount | 4 | 2.8 | 8 | 5.5 |
Table 4 recorded that statistically significant difference with p-value=0.000 in relation between functional constipation and drink water, fenugreek, herbs and soup, eaten brown bread and oats, nuts.
Food That Helps to Occurrence of Constipation | Functional Constipation(n=145) | X2 | P-value | ||||
No Constipation | Constipation | ||||||
No. | % | No. | % | ||||
Rice or Pasta | |||||||
Pre | Recommended amount | 0 | 0.0 | 62 | 42.8 | 13.694 | 0. 001** |
More than recommended | 0 | 0.0 | 83 | 57.2 | |||
Post | Recommended amount | 97 | 66.9 | 10 | 6.9 | ||
More than recommended | 34 | 23.4 | 4 | 2.8 | |||
Follow up | Recommended amount | 56 | 38.6 | 67 | 46.2 | ||
More than recommended | 14 | 9.7 | 8 | 5.5 | |||
Caffeine Drinks | |||||||
Pre | Recommended amount | 0 | 0.0 | 18 | 12.4 | 65.534 | 0.001** |
More than recommended | 0 | 0.0 | 127 | 87.6 | |||
Post | Recommended amount | 85 | 58.6 | 8 | 5.5 | ||
More than recommended | 46 | 31.7 | 6 | 4.1 | |||
Follow up | Recommended amount | 46 | 31.7 | 36 | 24.8 | ||
More than recommended | 24 | 16.6 | 39 | 26.9 | |||
Milk Products | |||||||
Pre | Recommended amount | 0 | 0.0 | 60 | 41.4 | 0.526 | 0.468 |
More than recommended | 0 | 0.0 | 85 | 58.6 | |||
Post | Recommended amount | 52 | 35.9 | 7 | 4.8 | ||
More than recommended | 79 | 54.5 | 7 | 4.8 | |||
Follow up | Recommended amount | 27 | 18.6 | 33 | 22.8 | ||
More than recommended | 43 | 29.7 | 42 | 29.0 | |||
Fried Food and Crackers | |||||||
Pre | Recommended amount | 0 | 0.0 | 93 | 64.1 |
More than recommended | 0 | 0.0 | 52 | 35.9 | 4.696 | 0.030* | |
Post | Recommended amount | 105 | 72.4 | 10 | 6.9 | ||
More than recommended | 26 | 17.9 | 4 | 2.8 | |||
Follow up | Recommended amount | 48 | 33.1 | 53 | 36.6 | ||
More than recommended | 22 | 15.2 | 22 | 15.2 | |||
White Bread | |||||||
Pre | Recommended amount | 0 | 0.0 | 44 | 30.3 | 38.002 | 0.001** |
More than recommended | 0 | 0.0 | 101 | 69.7 | |||
Post | Recommended amount | 105 | 72.4 | 10 | 6.9 | ||
More than recommended | 26 | 17.9 | 4 | 2.8 | |||
Follow up | Recommended amount | 40 | 27.6 | 46 | 31.7 | ||
More than recommended | 30 | 20.7 | 29 | 20.0 |
** P Value is significant at P<0.05
Table 5 showed the relation between food eaten that helps to decrease the occurrence of constipation revealed statistically significant difference throughout program phases in all items with p-value= 0.000 except in eaten milk products.
DISCUSSION
The current study represented that more than half of the studied sample had a history of hypertension followed by diabetes. Most of them used prescribed medication. A high prevalence of chronic diseases in old age, like the gastrointestinal diseases are of particular importance.
This agreed with Fragakis et al., (2018) who found constipation is prevalent in the Greater Western Sydney community. Constipation is linked to the quantity of medicines used, especially those with constipation. As a result, among the elderly with constipation, the focus should be on reducing the number of pharmaceuticals consumed rather than providing drugs with constipation as an adverse effect.
The present study documented that occurrence of functional constipation decreased after application of the educational program with statistically significance difference between pre, post, and follow up test. This means that the educational program was effective on the prevalence of functional constipation among the studied sample.
This agreed with Taniguchi et al., (2017) that found that consumption of waxy barley improved bowel movements and concluded that the consumption of dietary proper intake for 2 weeks improved defecation frequency and other symptoms of constipation. The present study disagreed with Yeun & Lee, (2015) who found that there was an improvement in the elderly prevalence of functional constipation after application of the program.
The present study illustrated generally there was a great improvement in the elderly total knowledge level in their knowledge at pre, post and follow up level.
Furthermore, Emmanuel, Mattace-Raso & Neri, (2017) found statistically significant improvements in the knowledge of the elderly in the study group in all aspects studied at the post-intervention phase. Zisberg et al., (2020) discovered that the study intervention was the sole statistically significant independent predictor of the knowledge score, explaining that more than half of this studied sample had improvement in elderly knowledge score.
The findings are consistent with those of Gao et al. (2019), who discovered a positive effect of educational programme on the elderly's awareness of pre-prevention and control of constipation. In line with Mohamed et al., (2013), who discovered that the intervention was helpful in enhancing their knowledge and shifting their attitudes to a more positive state, resulting in changes in their eating habits.
The present study showed that more than half of studied elderly had severe symptoms of constipation at pretest there is no symptoms in posttest.
This is in line with the findings of Ozturk & Klc (2019), who discovered that training on lifestyle adjustment led to a reduction in the intensity of constipation symptoms. Furthermore, Sierżantowicz, Lewko, & Jurkowska, (2020) found a highly statistically significant improvement in the intensity of constipation symptoms after a post-educational intervention on lifestyle adjustment, as measured by the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM).
The present study displayed that the total activities of studied elderly recorded during the last 7 days, that there was no statistically significant with respect to improvement except physical activities like walking, light and muscle strength activities documented significant difference in level of constipation.
Furthermore, George, & Borello-France, (2017) discovered that a 12-week programme of regular daily physical exercise relieved various symptoms of constipation, demonstrating that potential physical activity is necessary to promote colonic motility for chronic constipation. This is supported by Forootan, Bagheri, & Darvishi, (2018), who discovered that dietary changes, higher intestinal transit times, lack of physical activity, and recurrent medication used are all factors in functional constipation in the elderly.
The present study revealed that regarding all types of foods that help prevent constipation. While concerned foods that helped in the decrease of constipation showed statistically significant difference at pre, post and follow up test.
This is in agreement with Dobarrio-Sanz et al., (2020), who investigated the impact of non-pharmacological therapies on the progression of constipation in older seniors in long-term care facilities. Laxative tea, fermented oat drink, and patient education were among the interventions that increased the amount of bowel movements. These findings are consistent with Rondanelli et al., (2018), who discovered that fiber consumption is particularly important in the elderly, to the point where all national dietary guidelines and the food guide pyramid for the elderly emphasis the importance of increasing dietary fiber consumption, such as fruits and vegetables, to prevent functional constipation.
As a result, the current study findings are corroborated by Haller et al., (2020), who reported in a trial in which the intervention group received oat bran (fibre) for 12 weeks mixed in their regular diet while the control group received no extra fibre. Fiber supplementation in the cake formula permitted more than half of the fibre group to stop taking laxatives. This suggested that higher fibre consumption among the sample, together with other changes, could account for the drop in laxative usage and the intervention's success.
CONCLUSION
Constipation was relatively common in elderly. Socio-demographic factors associated with old age, female gender, along with low level of knowledge, physical activity and suitable dietary intake are related with increase symptoms of functional constipation among elderly.
Recommendations
Health education about functional constipation, physical activity, suitable dietary intake and toileting habits therough mass media, TV, radio, and magazine is necessary.
A simplified booklet about functional constipation (symptoms, physical activity and suitable diet) must be provided in the library of geriatric clubs.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest for the study.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Special thanks to all elderly who agreed to participate in the study
Finally, the researchers are thankful to all the members of the geriatric clubs and every member who helped with the study.
Sources of funding: the research has been funded on the researcher account.
Conflicting interest: there is no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Alimoradzadeh, R., Mokhtare, M., Agah, Sh. (2017). [Comparing the Prevalence of Constipation Risk Factors in the Elderly with and Without Constipation in Hazrat-e Rasoul (PBUH) Hospital (Persian)]. Scale for health research in Egypt. Iranian Journal of Ageing, 12 (1), 78-89.
Central Intelligence Agency. (2018). Egypt demographic profile 2018. https://www.indexmundi.com/agypt/ demographic_ profile.html.
Colleen, C. (2012). Methods of physical activity assessment in older adults. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 12809. Retrieved from: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12809.
Dobarrio-Sanz, I., Hernández-Padilla, J. M., López-Rodríguez, M. M., Fernández-Sola, C., Granero-Molina, J., & Ruiz-Fernández, M. D. (2020). Non-pharmacological interventions to improve constipation amongst older adults in long-term care settings: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Geriatric Nursing.
El-Gilany, A. El-Wehady, & M. El-Wasify (2012). Updating and validation of the socioeconomic status. EMHJ, 18 (9), 962-8.
Emmanuel, A., Mattace‐Raso, F., Neri, M. C., Petersen, K. U., Rey, E., & Rogers, J. (2017). Constipation in older people: A consensus statement. International journal of clinical practice, 71(1), e12920.
Farahat, T. M., El-Esrigy, F. A., & Salama, W. E. S. I. (2019). Risk factors for constipation among elderly attending family health center in Damietta District, Damietta Governorate, Egypt. Menoufia Medical Journal, 32(1), 145.
Forootan, M., Bagheri, N., & Darvishi, M. (2018). Chronic constipation: A review of literature. Medicine, 97(20).
Fragakis, A., Zhou, J., Mannan, H., & Vincent, Ho. (2018). Association between Drug Usage and Constipation in the Elderly Population of Greater Western Sydney Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 15(2), 226.
Gao, R., Tao, Y., Zhou, C., Li, J., Wang, X., Chen, L., ... & Guo, L. (2019). Exercise therapy in patients with constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, 54(2), 169-177.
George, S. E., & Borello-France, D. F. (2017). Perspective on physical therapist management of functional constipation. Physical therapy, 97(4), 478-493.
Mohamed, R. A., Awad, M. M., Shalaby, S. I., & Abdelsatar, H. N. (2013). Effect of nutritional health education program on elderly nutritional knowledge, attitude and practice in Abu Khalifa Primary Health Care Center, Ismailia Governorate. The Medical Journal of Cairo University, 81(2), 405-409.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2017). Constipation. https://cks.nice.org.uk/constipation#!scenario.
Nour-Eldein, H., Hind, M., Abdulmajeed, A., & Khaled, S. (2014). The effect of lifestyle modification on severity of constipation and quality of life of elders in nursing homes at Ismailia city, Egypt. Journal of Family and Community Medicine, 21(2), 100-106.
Ozturk, M. H., & Kılıc, S. P. (2019). Effective of education on quality of life and constipation severity in patients with primary constipation. Patient education and counseling, 102(2), 316-323.
Rondanelli, M., Faliva, M. A., Miccono, A., Naso, M., Nichetti, M., Riva, A., ... & Perna, S. (2018). Food pyramid for subjects with chronic pain: foods and dietary constituents as anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agents. Nutrition research reviews, 31(1), 131.
Roque, M., & Bouras, E. (2015). Epidemiology and management of chronic constipation in elderly patients.Clinical interventions in aging, 10, 919. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S54304.
Sierżantowicz, R., Lewko, J., & Jurkowska, G. (2020). The Impact of an Individual Educational Program on the Quality of Life and Severity of Symptoms of Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4230.
Taniguchi, K., Komae, K., Takahashi, A., Yoshioka, T., & Sone, Y. (2017). Effect of waxy barley, Kirarimochi, consumption on bowel movements of late-stage elderly residents at Roken nursing home. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 36(1), 17.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2020). World Population Ageing 2020 Highlights: Living arrangements of older persons (ST/ESA/SER.A/451).
Vargas-García, E. J., & Vargas-Salado, E. (2013). Food intake, nutritional status and physical activity between elderly with and without chronic constipation. A comparative study. Cirugia y cirujanos, 81(3), 214-220.
Yeun, Y., & Lee, J. (2015). Effect of a double-coated probiotic formulation on functional constipation in the elderly: a randomized, double blind, controlled study. Archives of pharmacal research, 38(7), 1345-1350.
Zisberg, A., Shulyaev, K., Gur-Yaish, N., Agmon, M., & Pud, D. (2021). Symptom clusters in hospitalized older adults: Characteristics and outcomes. Geriatric Nursing, 42(1), 240-246.