Evaluating Lead, Nickel and Copper Levels in Selected Pharmaceutical Products Available in Iraqi Local Market: Analytical and Toxicological Assessment

Noor Ahmed M. Waheed

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Mosul, Mosul, Nineveh Governorate, 41002, Iraq

*Corresponding Author’s Email: noorwaheed@uomosul.edu.iq

Abstract

Introduction: Lead, Nickel and Copper are widely spread heavy metals that are linked to many harmful effects to human body, they enter the body via food, water environment, pharmaceutical and cosmetic products. Exposure to these heavy metals could cause various organ damage including cardiovascular, neurological, immunosuppression and cancer. The harmful effect could take years or decades to appear. According to the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) it’s important to adhere with the permitted daily exposure (PDE) doses of these hazardous elements to avoid the potential health risks. Methods: In this study, we investigate the presence of Lead, Nickel and Copper in selected pharmaceutical products collected from local pharmacies in Mosul/ Iraq including four eye drops and six intravenous infusions which considered critical products due to their invasive effect and any contamination will lead to devastating outcomes. According to the maximum daily recommended dose of each product, the maximum ingested amount of Lead, Nickel and Copper were calculated and compared to the permitted daily exposure (PDE) of each metal. Results: The results showed that from the ten samples, three IV infusions (M1, M2, M3) contained high levels of Lead ranging from (0.1-0.15) ppm, while one IV infusion (M1) contained high levels of Nickel (5) ppm, Copper levels were within the safe limits in all investigated products. Conclusion: 30% of the samples investigated were found to be contaminated with unsafe levels of heavy metals, more research and screening studies should be done to confirm this finding, also such products should have more restricted quality control measures.

Keywords: Copper; Eye Drops; IV Infusion; Lead; Nickel

Introduction

Lead (Pb), nickel (Ni), and copper (Cu) are naturally occurring elements. The consumption of these heavy metals can lead to their accumulation in various vital organs, including the liver, kidneys and brain resulting in a wide range of harmful effects on the human body (Quader et al., 2022). They enter the body through the environment, food, water, medicines, personal care products and plant products. The main sources of environmental pollution with heavy metals are mining, industrial emissions and solid waste. Then heavy metals can emerge to the soil and water through rainfall, leading to extensive soil and water pollution (Yu et al., 2025).

Prolonged exposure may lead to neurological (Chen et al., 2016), cardiovascular (Yang et al., 2020), and immunological (Mishra & Singh, 2020) side effects, as well as cancer (Lawal et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2015). The harmful effect of these heavy metals depends on various factors such as the type of metal, the route, the duration of use and the age of the patient. Children are more prone to the toxic effect of these elements compared to elderly people due to their immature body systems (Sohail et al., 2024), as Pb toxicity in young age could lead to premature deaths and less IQ points (Kinally et al., 2025)

Heavy metals can generally be classified according to their toxicity as follows: toxic heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni, and Pb), semi-metal heavy metals (Sb and Bi), and essential non-toxic heavy metals that become toxic at higher levels (Co, Cu, Fe, Mo, Mn, Se, Sn, and Zn). Pharmaceutical products contaminated with heavy metals can cause serious health problems (Chaturvedi et al., 2021).

Heavy metals may enter pharmaceutical products through raw materials, water, manufacturing equipment, and/or container closure systems. The ICH provides a safety guideline, ICH Q3D, for assessing and controlling elemental contamination in pharmaceutical products by establishing limits for permitted daily exposure (PDE) in μg/day for each toxic element across different routes of administration (Ulman et al., 2012).

In this investigation, we assessed the ammount of Pb, Ni, and Cu in selected pharmaceutical items, including eye drops and IV infusions. Because of their invasive nature, any contamination could be hazardous and may lead to devastating outcomes. For heavy metals, their PDE limits are the same Since both eye drops and parenterals bypass metabolism and cause comparable systemic health issues (Oliveira et al., 2023).

Health Risks

Lead (Pb)

Lead poisoning has irreversible negative effects on various body organs; therefore, its considered a major health concern.

some harmful effects include:

Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE)

According to the ICH Q3D guideline, the maximum quantity of an elemental impurity that is considered safe for daily human exposure over a lifetime expressed in µg/day is termed as Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE).

The purpose of this regulatory concept is to assess limits for heavy metals contamination in pharmaceutical products (Ulman et al., 2012).

In this study, the levels of heavy metals in a selected number eye drops and IV infusions were examined. Their PDE limits are the same due to the comparable systemic metabolism and toxicity of such pharmaceuticals (Oliveira et al., 2023), and according to the ICH Q3D guideline for these dosage forms, the PDE limits for Pb, Ni, and Cu are 5 µg/day, 20 µg/day, and 340 µg/day, respectively (Ulman et al., 2012).

Methodology

All reagents utilized in this work were of analytical reagent grade. Pb, Ni, and Cu standard solution were provided by Sigma-Aldrich, Germany. Type 1 water was used for all heavy metal dilutions. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were used to evaluate Pb, Ni, and Cu levels. The concentration of heavy metals were measured in µg/ml (ppm), and based on the maximum daily dose of each medication, the maximum daily intake of each metal was calculated and compared to its respective PDE.

Sample Collection

Ten pharmaceutical items were selected and purchased from local pharmacies in Mosul, Iraq, in April 2025. Every sample, including four eye drops and six IV infusions, was within its expiration date and they originated from Jordan, Ukraine, Greece, India, Pakistan, Switzerland, and Syria (Liang et al., 2014).

Instrument

To assess the levels of heavy metals in the selected samples, Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (GFAAS) was conducted by using an atomic absorption spectrometer (210 VGP, BUCK Scientific, USA). Detailed methodology is provided in the following references: Inui et al. (2012) and Liang et al. (2014). The conditions of measurements are listed in Table 1.

Table 1: Conditions of Measurements of Each Element


The conditions of measurements

Heavy metals

Pb

Ni

Cu

Wavelength (nm)

283.3

232

324.7

Lamp current mA

7.0

6.0

1.5

Slit width nm

0.7

0.2

0.7

PMT voltage v

481.0

504.9

465.3

Results

The analysis results showed that, of the ten samples, seven samples (70%) were within the safe limits established by the ICH Q3D guideline, while three samples (30%) contained elevated levels of Pb, including one sample that had unsafe levels of both Pb and Ni. The detailed results are presented in Tables 2, 3, and 4.

Table 2: Quantitative Pb Analysis Results with Products Information and Maximum Daily Doses (ml)


Code

Pharmaceutical product

Active ingredient

Dosage form

Max. Daily Dose (ml)

Pb µg/ml (ppm)

Maximum Daily Consumed Amount of pb (µg/day)

D1

Apidex/Jordan

Dexamethasone phosphate

Eye drop

1ml

0.76±0.001

0.76

D2

Tobracin/Jordan

Tobramycin

Eye drop

1ml

0.025± 0.0003

0.025

D3

Ciprofarm/Ukraine

Ciprofloxacin

Eye drop

1ml

0.01± 0.002

0.01

D4

Dexachlor/Greece

Dexamethasone/ chloramphenicol

Eye drop

1ml

0.01± 0.005

0.01

P1

Dolocetam/India

Acetaminophen 1g/100ml

IV

infusion

400 ml

0.01±0.003

4

P2

Feveral/Pakistan

Acetaminophen 1g/100ml

IV

infusion

400 ml

0.01±0.002

4

P3

Paraconica/Switzerland

Acetaminophen 1g/100ml

IV

infusion

400 ml

UD

UD

M1

Oubragyl/Syria

Metronidazole

0.5 g/100ml

IV

infusion

300ml

0.15±0.001

45

M2

Metrodar- darnista/Ukraine

Metronidazole

0.5 g/100ml

IV

infusion

300ml

0.13±0.003

39

M3

Metromark/India

Metronidazole

0.5 g/100ml

IV

infusion

300ml

0.1±0.005

30

D= eye drop, P= paracetamol IV infusion, M= Metronidazole IV infusion UD=undetectable

Table 3: Quantitative Ni Analysis Results with Products Information and Maximum Daily Doses (ml)


Code

Pharmaceutical Product

Active Ingredient

Dosage form

Max. Daily Dose (ml)

Ni

µg/ml (ppm)

Maximum Daily Consumed Amount of Ni

µg/day

D1

Apidex/jordan

Dexamethasone phosphate

Eye drop

1ml

0.073±

0.003

0.073

D2

Tobracin/jordan

Tobramycin

Eye drop

1ml

0.014±

0.002

0.014

D3

Ciprofarm/Ukraine

Ciprofloxacin

Eye drop

1ml

0.01±0.001

0.01

D4

Dexachlor/Greece

Dexamethasone/ chloramphenicol

Eye drop

1ml

0.02±0.003

0.02

P1

Dolocetam/India

Acetaminophen 1g/100ml

IV

infusion

400 ml

UD

UD

P2

Feveral/Pakistan

Acetaminophen 1g/100ml

IV

infusion

400 ml

UD

UD

P3

Paraconica/Switze rland

Acetaminophen 1g/100ml

IV

infusion

400 ml

UD

UD

M1

Oubragyl/Syria

Metronidazole

0.5 g/100ml

IV

infusion

300ml

5± 0.002

1500

M2

Metrodar- darnista/Ukraine

Metronidazole

0.5 g/100ml

IV

infusion

300ml

UD

UD

M3

Metromark/India

Metronidazole

0.5 g/100ml

IV

infusion

300ml

UD

UD

D= eye drop, P= paracetamol IV infusion, M= Metronidazole IV infusion, UD=undetectable

Table 4: Quantitative Cu analysis results with products information and maximum daily doses (ml)


Code

Pharmaceutical Product

Active Ingredient

Dosage form

Max. Daily Dose (ml)

Cu

µg/ml (ppm)

Maximum Daily Consumed Amount of Cu

µg/day

D1

Apidex/jordan

Dexamethasone phosphate

Eye drop

1ml

0.084± 0.004

0.084

D2

Tobracin/jordan

Tobramycin

Eye drop

1ml

0.075± 0.002

0.075

D3

Ciprofarm/Ukraine

Ciprofloxacin

Eye drop

1ml

UD

UD

D4

Dexachlor/Greece

Dexamethasone/ chloramphenicol

Eye drop

1ml

UD

UD

P1

Dolocetam/India

Acetaminophen 1g/100ml

IV

infusion

400ml

UD

UD

P2

Feveral/Pakistan

Acetaminophen 1g/100ml

IV

infusion

400ml

UD

UD

P3

Paraconica/Switzerland

Acetaminophen 1g/100ml

IV

infusion

400ml

UD

UD

M1

Oubragyl/Syria

Metronidazole

0.5 g/100ml

IV

infusion

300ml

0.12± 0.003

36

M2

Metrodar- darnista/Ukraine

Metronidazole

0.5 g/100ml

IV

infusion

300ml

0.2± 0.001

60

M3

Metromark/India

Metronidazole

0.5 g/100ml

IV

infusion

300ml

0.1 ± 0.001

30

D= eye drop, P= paracetamol IV infusion, M= Metronidazole IV infusion UD=undetectable

Discussion

With increasing industrial activities, urbanization, energy consumption and intensive agricultural production especially in developing countries, heavy metal pollution including air, water and soil has accelerated worldwide, posing an increasing concerns about human health and environmental sustainability (Ondrasek et al., 2025).

In our study, the Pb analysis in the selected pharmaceutical products (Table 2) shows that 7 samples (70%) were within the safe limits. Otherwise, the three metronidazole IV infusion samples (30%) exhibit significantly high Pb content.

According to the ICH Q3D guideline, these three samples exceeded the parenteral PDE of 5 µg/day (Ulman et al., 2012), with M1 reaching nine times the PDE, raising a significant toxicological concern, particularly for hospitalized patients requiring repeated doses and/or prolonged therapy.

The paracetamol IV infusion samples P1, P2 (0.01±0.003, 0.01±0.002 µg/ml) (Table 2) exhibit high Pb levels, although they are within the PDE, but are so close to the toxic levels.

The above analysis outcomes raise health concerns about the safety of these critical products, as Pb levels could cause CNS, cardiovascular system as well as premature death (Kinally et al., 2025)

The Ni analysis results (Table 3) revealed that all samples except one were within ICH Q3D safe limit (Ulman et al., 2012). The metronidazole IV infusion sample M1 (5±0.002 µg/ml) (Table 3) containing significantly high level of Ni with 75 times the PDE. These extremely high levels of Ni in this product may pose acute health problem such as allergy and increasing risk of cancer (Begum et al., 2022; Tramontana et al., 2020).

The Cu analysis indicated that all ten samples were within safe limits according to the ICH Q3D guideline (Ulman et al., 2012) (Table 4).

The detection of elevated levels of Pb and Ni in pharmaceutical formulations represents serious quality and safety concerns, as both elements are classified as toxic elemental impurities according to the ICH Q3D guideline (Ulman et al., 2012).

The presence of these elements could originate from raw materials, lead-based pigment as well as equipment and packaging system. These low quality products could be the result of bad manufacturing circumstances, neglected equipment maintenance, along with weak quality control regulations in these manufacturers (Onyemali, 2024; Ulman et al., 2012).

Conclusion

Eye drops and parenterals are considered critical dosage forms due to their route of administration that requires high sterility and purity of the used excipient. The elevated concentrations of heavy metals in such products indicate lack in raw material and final product quality control, bad equipment maintenance and substandard manufacturing practices.

In this study, the levels of (Pb, Ni, and Cu) were investigated in ten samples, including four eye drops and six IV infusions. The results were compared with the ICH Q3D guidelines. The analysis revealed that three samples contained high levels of Pb, and one sample contained high levels of Ni. the presence of these metals raise a significant safety concerns, particularly for patients requiring prolonged therapy.

The analysis of these samples revealed the wide distribution of such contaminated products that could be harmful to large number of people, our suggestion is to support further screening studies in this field to confirm these findings, including additional products and various heavy metals to be investigated. Health authorities and quality control personnel should be aware of these contaminants by conducting accurate and accessible heavy metal testing as part of quality control requirements, as well as withdrawing contaminated products from the market and applying appropriate sanctions on manufacturers and suppliers.

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgement

The author is thankful to the College of Pharmacy and to the Environmental Research Center, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.

References

Begum, W., Rai, S., Banerjee, S., Bhattacharjee, S., Mondal, M. H., Bhattarai, A., & Saha, B. (2022). A comprehensive review on the sources, essentiality and toxicological profile of nickel. In RSC Advances (Vol. 12, Issue 15, pp. 9139–9153). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ra00378c

Kinally, C., Fuller, R., Larsen, B., Hu, H., & Lanphear, B. (2025). Science of the Total Environment A review of lead exposure source attributional studies. Science of the Total Environment, 990(March), 179838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179838

Ondrasek, G., Shepherd, J., Rathod, S., Dharavath, R., Rashid, M. I., Brtnicky, M., ... & Rengel, Z. (2025). Metal contamination–a global environmental issue: sources, implications & advances in mitigation. RSC Advances, 15(5), 3904-3927. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA04639K

Onyemali, S. O. (2024). Heavy metal contamination of pharmaceutical products commonly sold in Nigeria. Madonna University Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 4(1), 9–24. https://www.journal.madonnauniversity.edu.ng/index.php/medicine/article/view/166?utm_source=chat gpt.com

Sohail, M., Khan, A., Ahmad, L., Khan, A., Mateen, A., Jahan, S., Ullah, U., Almasoud, N., Alomar, T. S., Rauf, A., Ullah, F., Ul, N., & Nawaz, A. (2024). Heliyon Quantification of toxic heavy metals , trace elements and essential minerals contents in traditional herbal medicines commonly utilized in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Heliyon, 10(3), e25384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25384

Tramontana, M., Bianchi, L., Hansel, K., Agostinelli, D., & Stingeni, L. (2020). Nickel Allergy: Epidemiology, Pathomechanism, Clinical Patterns, Treatment and Prevention Programs. Endocrine,Metabolic & Immune Disorders - Drug Targets, 20(7), 992–1002.https://doi.org/10.2174/1871530320666200128141900

Ulman, K., Schwarzwalder, N., Teasdale, A., Schoneker, D., & Zawislak, P. (2012). ICH guideline Q3D(R2) on Elemental Impurities. In Pharmaceutical Technology (Vol. 36, Issue 11).

Yu, Y. L., An, D. W., Yang, W. Y., Zhang, D. Y., Martens, D. S., Nawrot, T. S., & Staessen, J. A. (2025). Health risks related to environmental and occupational lead exposure. Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska), 83(2), 138-148. https://doi.org/10.33963/v.phj.104575

Quader, M. F. B., Fatema, T. S., Mazed, M. Al, Nur Popy, Z., Al Nahid, S. A., Islam, M. A., & Ahmed,S. I. (2022). Heavy Metal Accumulation among Different Organs of Cultured Rohu and Catla along with Evaluation of Enzymatic Activities in Examined Organs. Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research, 16(3), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajfar/2022/v16i330375

Chen, P., Miah, M. R., & Aschner, M. (2016). Metals and Neurodegeneration. F1000Research, 5, 1– 12. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7431.1

Yang, A. M., Lo, K., Zheng, T. Z., Yang, J. L., Bai, Y. N., Feng, Y. Q., Cheng, N., & Liu, S. M. (2020). Environmental heavy metals and cardiovascular diseases: Status and future direction. Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine, 6(4), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdtm.2020.02.005

Mishra, K. P., & Singh, S. B. (2020). Heavy metals exposure and risk of autoimmune diseases: a review. Arch Immunol Allergy, 3(2), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.22259/2639-1848.0302004

Lawal, K. K., Ekeleme, I. K., Onuigbo, C. M., Ikpeazu, V. O., & Obiekezie, S. O. (2021). A review on the public health implications of heavy metals. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 10(3), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2021.10.3.0249

Kim, H. S., Kim, Y. J., & Seo, Y. R. (2015). An overview of carcinogenic heavy metal: molecular toxicity mechanism and prevention. Journal of Cancer Prevention, 20(4), 232. https://doi.org/10.15430/jcp.2015.20.4.232

Chaturvedi, P., Shukla, P., Giri, B. S., Chowdhary, P., Chandra, R., Gupta, P., & Pandey, A. (2021). Prevalence and hazardous impact of pharmaceutical and personal care products and antibiotics in environment: A review on emerging contaminants. Environmental Research, 194(September 2020), 110664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110664

Oliveira, M. D., Melo, E. S. D. P., Silva, T. C. D., Cardozo, C. M. L., Siqueira, I. V., Hamaji, M. P., ... & Nascimento, V. A. D. (2023). Quantification of metal (loid) s in lubricating eye drops used in the treatment of dry eye disease. Molecules, 28(18), 6508. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28186508

Maria, M. P. S., Hill, B. D., & Kline, J. (2019). Lead (Pb) neurotoxicology and cognition. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 8(3), 272-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2018.1428803

Albakri, A. (2019). Toxin-induced cardiomyopathy: A review and pooled analysis of pathophysiology, diagnosis and clinical management. Research and Review Insights, 3(1), 1–14.https://doi.org/10.15761/rri.1000150

Upadhyay, K., Viramgami, A., Bagepally, B. S., & Balachandar, R. (2024). Association between chronic lead exposure and markers of kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Toxicology Reports, 13(November), 101837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101837

Wani, A. L., Ara, A., & Usmani, J. A. (2015). Lead toxicity: A review. Interdisciplinary Toxicology, 8(2), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/intox-2015-0009

Guo, H., Liu, H., Wu, H., Cui, H., Fang, J., Zuo, Z., Deng, J., Li, Y., Wang, X., & Zhao, L. (2019). Nickel Carcinogenesis Mechanism: DNA Damage. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(19), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194690

Karim, N. (2018). Copper and Human Health- A Review. Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College, 08(02), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.51985/jbumdc2018046

Gaetke, L. M., Chow-Johnson, H. S., & Chow, C. K. (2014). Copper: Toxicological relevance and mechanisms. Archives of Toxicology, 88(11), 1929–1938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-014-1355-y

Bellinger, D. C. (2005). Teratogen update: lead and pregnancy. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 73(6), 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20127

Liang, P., Yu, J., Yang, E., & Peng, L. (2014). Determination of trace levels of lead in water samples by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry after dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop. Atomic Spectroscopy, 35(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.46770/as.2014.02.005

Inui, T., Kosuge, A., Ohbuchi, A., Fujita, K., Koike, Y., Kitano, M., & Nakamura, T. (2012). Determination of Heavy Metals at Sub-ppb Levels in Water by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Using a Direct Introduction Technique after Preconcentration with an Iminodiacetate Extraction Disk. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 03(10), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2012.310090