Exploring The Efficacy of Homeopathic Treatment in Immunologic Disorders: A Case Series Analysis

Goay Lay Nee and Nurul Sofiyah bt Md Shater

School of Pharmacy, Lincoln University College, Wisma Lincoln, No. 12-18, Jalan SS 6/12, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

*Corresponding Author’s Email: laneyluc2020@gmail.com

Abstract

Homeopathy is increasingly acknowledged as a complementary approach for managing autoimmune disorders, although empirical validation remains limited. This retrospective case series evaluates its efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), dermatitis, Graves’ disease, and mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD). While Traditional and Complementary Medicine (T&CM) is gaining acceptance in Malaysia, scientific studies on its role in autoimmune disease management are scarce. Treatment outcomes were assessed using qualitative and quantitative measures, including clinical symptoms and laboratory markers such as RA factor and Antinuclear Antigen (ANA) levels. Five cases demonstrated notable symptom relief, immune modulation, and improved well-being. RA patients showed reduced joint pain and enhanced mobility, MCTD cases achieved ANA normalization and skin recovery, and a Graves’ disease patient experienced decreased thyroid antibodies, improved eye health, and greater emotional stability. Treatment durations ranged from 24 to 60 months, with chronic cases requiring longer therapy. Common patterns included holistic symptom resolution and enhanced quality of life. However, challenges to empirical validation include small sample size, absence of control groups, and reliance on subjective measures. The lack of placebo-controlled trials limits the ability to attribute improvements solely to homeopathy, while patient adherence and external factors—such as concurrent medical treatments and lifestyle changes—further complicate assessment. Future research should prioritize large-scale randomized controlled trials, incorporate objective biomarkers, and foster interdisciplinary collaboration between homeopaths and conventional practitioners. These findings highlight homeopathy’s potential as a holistic, patient-centered approach in autoimmune disease management, with further rigorous studies needed to establish long-term efficacy and support integration into mainstream healthcare.

Keywords: Autoimmune Disorders; Complementary Medicine; Homeopathy; Immunomodulation; Integrative Healthcare

Introduction Background

Autoimmune diseases are chronic conditions caused by immune system dysfunction, where the body mistakenly attacks its own tissues, leading to inflammation, tissue damage, and organ impairment. Common examples include rheumatoid arthritis (RA), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and Graves’ disease. Despite affecting different systems, these conditions share key features such as autoantibodies, cytokine imbalances, and persistent inflammation.

Conventional treatments typically involve immunosuppressants, corticosteroids, NSAIDs, and DMARDs. While these can reduce symptoms and inflammation, they often come with significant side effects, including digestive issues, liver strain, and increased infection risk. Furthermore, therapeutic responses vary, and many patients continue to face flare-ups or incomplete symptom relief. As autoimmune diseases are long-term and impact both physical and emotional health, there is growing interest in more individualised, holistic approaches that support overall well-being.

Homeopathy and T&CM in Malaysia

Homeopathy, based on the principle of "like cures like" and using highly diluted natural substances, has gained recognition as a complementary therapy for managing chronic and autoimmune conditions. It provides individualised treatment tailored to each patient's unique symptoms and constitutional traits.

In Malaysia, Traditional and Complementary Medicine (T&CM) is officially integrated into the healthcare system, with regulatory frameworks such as the Traditional and Complementary Medicine Act 2016 (Act 775) supporting its use. Homeopathy, while still modest, has seen growing public acceptance, with Mahmud et al. (2009) reporting a 10% utilisation rate and the Ministry of Health Malaysia (2015) indicating increasing public openness and willingness to invest in homeopathic care.

Despite this growing interest, scientific evidence supporting homeopathy’s effectiveness in treating autoimmune diseases remains limited. Most studies face methodological challenges like small sample sizes and subjective outcome measures. Additionally, homeopathy’s individualised approach complicates standardisation, hindering its integration into conventional evidence-based healthcare models and limiting broader acceptance.

Research Objective and Questions

The primary objective of this study is to explore whether individualised homeopathy, based on classical principles, can:

Emotional Healing as a Catalyst for Physical Recovery: Homeopathy often views emotional disturbances as precursors to physical ailments. In these cases, emotional resolution (e.g., anxiety, irritability) coincided with physical symptom reversal, demonstrating the mind-body synergy in healing.

Emerging Themes and Observations

A reflection on these cases reveals recurring patterns that emphasise the integrative and patient- centered nature of classical homeopathy.

Multidimensional Healing Trajectories: Recovery was not limited to one organ system. For example, Case #3 showed concurrent improvement in digestive issues, skin problems, and emotional stability, emphasising the interconnectedness of body and mind.

Innate Shift Toward Healthier Habits: As vitality improved, patients spontaneously adopted healthier habits. Better sleep routines and dietary awareness, indicating that restored balance fosters self-care.

Restoration of Immune Balance: Homeopathic treatment seemed to recalibrate the immune system rather than suppress it with lab markers (e.g., RF, ANA, TRAb, C3/C4) showing improvement, signaling immune rebalancing.

Emotional Recovery as a Gateway to Physical Healing: In all cases, emotional resolution preceded physical improvement. This pattern reinforces the idea that emotional well-being is foundational for physiological recovery, particularly in chronic disease.

Long-Term Stability and Self-Regulation: A promising outcome was the reduction in reliance on conventional medications, coupled with enhanced vitality and fewer acute episodes. This suggests improved immune defense and greater systemic self-regulation over time. These themes demonstrate how homeopathy, practiced according to classical principles, supports deep, integrative healing.

By addressing physical, emotional, and behavioral dimensions, it promotes sustainable healt h, reinforcing homeopathy’s value as a holistic approach for chronic, complex conditions.

Discussion

The following section explores key insights drawn from the clinical outcomes and patterns observed in these five autoimmune cases.

Interpretation of Findings

The findings offer insights into the role of individualised homeopathy in managing autoimmune and chronic inflammatory conditions. Cases involving rheumatoid arthritis (RA), dermatitis, and Graves’ disease showed significant improvements in clinical markers, emotional health, and quality of life, suggesting homeopathy’s immune-modulating potential.

Disease Progression and Immune Modulation: The reduction in RA factor levels—dropping from 211 IU/ml to 17 IU/ml in case #1 and 238 IU/ml to below 20 IU/ml in case #2—reflects a clinical turnaround.

These results resonate with evidence suggesting homeopathy restores immune equilibrium, not merely suppresses symptoms (Vithoulkas & Berghian-Grosan, 2020).

Improvements in ANA levels in case #3 and Case #4, and the normalised TRAb in Case #5 further support the hypothesis that individualised homeopathy modulates dysfunctional immune responses.

Symptom Fluctuations and Homeopathic Aggravation: Initial symptom aggravation, such as in case #4, where skin symptoms flared post-Arsenicum administration, is often seen as a positive therapeutic process (Kent, 1897). This was followed by stabilisation of kidney function and reduced gout attacks, demonstrating the value of homeopathic aggravation in achieving deep, systemic healing (Chabanov, Tsintzas & Vithoulkas, 2018).

Emotional and Gastrointestinal Symptoms: Emotional disturbances and gastrointestinal dysfunctions are common in autoimmune disorders. In case #5, anxiety and palpitations were effectively managed with Causticum and Ignatia, leading to systemic improvement. This supports the integrated mind-body approach emphasised in autoimmune disease treatment (Bekarissova, Bekarisov & Bekaryssova, 2019).

Chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in cases #3 and #4 improved with Mezereum, Petroleum, and Rhus toxicodendron, reaffirming the connection between gut health and immune regulation (Tripathy, 2023).

Long-Term Efficacy and Monitoring: Extended follow-ups showed significant improvement in chronic conditions. Case #4 reversed from Stage 4 chronic kidney disease to Stage 1, and case #5 achieved sustained remission of Graves' disease symptoms. These results underscore the importance of precise remedy selection and ongoing monitoring in achieving long-term therapeutic success.

Comparison with Existing Literature

The results resonate with studies supporting homeopathy’s role in autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disorders. Research by Hossain (2024) shows improvements in RA and lupus with individualised homeopathy. Long-term studies on chronic eczema and ulcerative colitis (Patil, 2020) also report significant symptom reductions, reinforcing homeopathy’s potential in offering holistic, individualised treatment.

Clinical Insight

One key insight is that homeopathy provides long-term disease modulation rather than merely symptom suppression. The MONARCH causality assessment (Lamba et al., 2020), summarised in Table 3, further strengthens clinical confidence. Figure 5 shows the high scores (10–11 out of 12) indicate a strong causal relationship between individualised homeopathic treatment and clinical improvement. These outcomes reflect indicators of a true curative response in classical homeopathy and highlight its therapeutic potential in autoimmune disease management.

Table 3: Modified Naranjo Criteria for Homeopathy (MONARCH) – for Causality Evaluation Scores for Cases #1 to #5


image

(Note: Each criterion is assigned a score (e.g., Yes = 1, No = 0)


A graph with blue lines

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 5: Strong Causal Relationship between Homeopathy and Clinical Improvement

Recommendations

To enhance the scientific credibility of homeopathy in treating autoimmune disorders, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial. While case series and observational studies suggest promising therapeutic effects, only robust RCTs can provide definitive evidence. Key recommendations for future research include:

Expanded Sample Sizes: Many existing studies, including this case series, are limited by small, non- randomised samples. Future studies should include larger patient cohorts to improve external validity and represent a broader spectrum of autoimmune conditions.

Control and Placebo Arms: Well-designed RCTs with appropriate comparators—either standard care or placebo—are essential for controlling confounding variables like natural disease progression and patient expectations.

Standardised Outcome Metrics: Incorporating validated quality-of-life instruments and other objective measures will enable consistent tracking of treatment effects, providing a more objective evaluation of treatment efficacy.

Limitations

While the clinical outcomes are promising, several limitations must be acknowledged. The small sample size restricts the generalisability of the findings, and the absence of a control group makes it challenging to isolate the specific effects of homeopathy. Retrospective data collection may introduce potential biases, while the concurrent use of conventional therapies complicates the attribution of outcomes solely to homeopathy. Furthermore, subjective symptoms were not always assessed using standardised tools, which may affect the objectivity of the results. Future research should aim to overcome these limitations by conducting randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with larger cohorts and employing objective outcome measures to more accurately evaluate homeopathy’s role in the management of autoimmune diseases.

Conclusion

This study evaluated the effectiveness of individualised homeopathic treatment for chronic autoimmune disorders through five case reports. The results suggest that homeopathy can contribute to immune regulation, symptom relief, and overall well-being, with improvements in autoimmune markers, joint flexibility, skin condition, and emotional stability. Personalised homeopathy, aligned with a patient’s unique profile, may complement conventional treatments for autoimmune conditions like rheumatoid arthritis and Graves’ disease. However, the case-based design limits the generalisability of the findings, and further research, particularly randomised controlled trials, is needed to validate these outcomes. An interdisciplinary approach combining homeopathy with conventional medicine could enhance therapeutic synergy and care options.

Given the multifaceted nature of autoimmune diseases and the individualised approach of homeopathy, an integrative, interdisciplinary model of care is essential. Collaboration across medical and research fields will enhance treatment effectiveness and strengthen scientific credibility. Combining the expertise of homeopaths and immunologists could provide a more comprehensive approach to managing autoimmune disorders, with immunologists monitoring immune system behavior and biomarkers while homeopaths offer personalised remedies tailored to each patient’s unique profile. Such collaboration may promote a deeper understanding of how homeopathy influences immune regulation.

Biomedical researchers also have a pivotal role in advancing the evidence base for homeopathy. Their involvement in designing rigorous studies, analysing data, and contextualising results within the broader framework of immunology is critical for validating the clinical impact of homeopathy. Furthermore, interdisciplinary clinical trials that involve both conventional medical experts and homeopathic practitioners can provide a holistic evaluation of outcomes, fostering mutual respect and integration between medical paradigms.

Future studies should also incorporate standardised Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to better capture patients’ experiences. When combined with laboratory tests, these tools can offer a fuller and more objective picture of homeopathy’s effectiveness. Additionally, creating shared data platforms across institutions and research domains will enable more robust evidence generation, making findings more relevant across different autoimmune diseases and patient populations.

Conflict of Interest

The authors affirm that there are no conflicting objectives.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank all the participants involved in this study for their valuable contributions.

References

Ministry of Health Malaysia. (2015). National Health and Morbidity Survey 2015 (Volume IV). https://www.moh.gov.my/moh/resources/NHMS2015-VolumeIV.pdf

Vithoulkas, G., & Van Woensel, E. (2010). Levels of Health. The Second Volume of the Science of Homeopathy. International academy of classical. Homeopathy, 2, 27-66.

Hossain, T. (2024). Impact of high-dilution homeopathic remedies on autoimmune disorders. Journal of Homeopathy Studies, 1(1), 03-06. https://www.homeopathyjournal.com/archives/2024/vol1issue1/PartA/1-1-2- 451.pdf

Lamba, C. D., Gupta, V. K., Van Haselen, R., et al. (2020). Evaluation of the modified Naranjo criteria for assessing causal attribution of clinical outcome to homeopathic intervention. Homeopathy, 109(4), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701251

Mahesh, S., Mallappa, M., Habchi, O., Konstanta, V., Chise, C., Sykiotou, P., & Vithoulkas, G. (2021). Appearance of acute inflammatory state indicates improvement in atopic dermatitis cases under classical homeopathic treatment: a case series. Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179547621994103

Chabanov, D., Tsintzas, D., & Vithoulkas, G. (2018). Levels of health theory with the example of a case of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515690X18777995

Tripathy, T. (2023). Bowel nosodes of homoeopathy in colorectal cancer and auto immune, metabolic, neuro psychiatric disorders. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences, 11(9), 1667-1676. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2023.v11i09.014

Mahmud, Z. M., Aris, T., Syed Mohamed, A. F., Sondi, S., Azman, A. H., Maimunah, A. H., Haniza, M. A., Siti Haslinda, M. D., Zulkarnain, A. K., Zakiah, I., & Wan Zaleha, W. C. (2009). Use of traditional and complementary medicine in Malaysia: A baseline study. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 17(4), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2009.04.002

Patil, P.C. (2020). Evaluating the Efficacy of Homeopathic Treatments in the Management of Eczema: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 6(4). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.24772

Bekarissova, S., Bekarisov, O., & Bekaryssova, D. (2024). An integrated approach to the treatment of rheumatic diseases: the role of psychological interventions. Rheumatology International, 44(12), 2727-2735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05728-9

Vithoulkas, G., & Chabanov, D. (2023). The evolution of miasm theory and its relevance to homeopathic prescribing. Homeopathy, 112(01), 057-064.https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751257

Vithoulkas, G., & Berghian-Grosan, C. (2020). The spin of electrons and the proof for the action of homeopathic remedies. Journal of Medicine and Life, 13(3), 278. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2020-0140