SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS ON SANITATION AND HYGIENE: HOW CAN WE IMPROVE DEMAND AND SUPPLY CHAIN BARRIERS IN RURAL DRY ZONE AREA OF MYANMAR?
Aung Myat Khaing 1*, Ali Ameen2, Osama Isaac3
1Lincoln University College, Malaysia.
2,3Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Lincoln University College, Malaysia
*Corresponding Author’s Email: amk.ginga@gmail.com
Access to Basic Services to vulnerable communities are key priorities for Local Government under the National League for Democracy led Myanmar Government Since April 2016. Regarding the research gaps for Myanmar, the study defines to identify possible business models, interventions and support services which have the potential to improve the availability of affordable sanitation products and services to rural low-income households.
This study was employed in mixed method. Data collection components were conducted using qualitative research techniques particularly Key Informant Interviews (KII) and focus group discussions (FGD) with farmers, traders, processors, masons, service providers, and representatives from the respective areas and supply chain linkage in the geographical locations. Semi-structured household-based and services-based questionnaires will be developed and interviewed to 54 household and explore questions relevant to their demand and opinion on their current practices and usages of sanitation and hygiene utilities.
The study results will be helpful for promoting rural sanitation and hygiene products and services in dry zone areas. It will critically inform the design of interventions to support strengthen market-based solution and pro-poor support mechanisms such as Sanitation Demand Creation, Behaviour Change Communication, and disability and gender integration.
The former opposition party, the National League for Democracy (NLD) won in a landslide victory and now holds an absolute majority in both upper and lower houses of the Hlutaw (Myanmar Parliament). Thus, new Myanmar Government has inherited a country in transaction. Among these transition process, social, education and Primary healthcare transforming processes are key priorities for the National League for Democracy led by the government since April 2016.
The supply chain analysis will critically inform the design of interventions to support and strengthen market-based solution and pro-poor support mechanisms in the Study location in Nyaung U Township. It will inform activities undertaken as part of the Rural Supply Analysis
on Hygiene and Sanitation Programme components such as Sanitation Demand Creation, Behaviour Change Communication, and gender integration. Based on the situation analysis of PLAN International in Myanmar, access to improved water supplies was estimated at 86 percent nationally, though access in rural areas is estimated to be slightly lower at 81 percent. Of the latter, 3 percent have piped water supplies and 19 percent drink from unimproved water sources. While national improved sanitation coverage is reported at 77 percent, with an additional 13 percent using shared facilities, sector experts generally regard official Myanmar WASH access figures (including the MICS and JMP data) to be over reported. Similarly, reported figures of rural improved sanitation coverage of 74 percent, 14 percent share facilities, and 7 percent open defecation, should be used with caution. The assessment study state that
percent, used latrine with good sanitary condition. Half of the respondents disposed of children’s faces in the latrine and 1 in 5 household threw trash into the dry stream. With regards to sanitation and health, mothers reported that outbreak of diarrhoea occurred 2 times a year, once in April (Summer period in Myanmar) and another in July and August (Monsoon period in Myanmar). They perceived that diarrhoea outbreaks were caused by shortage of water and availability of many fruits. Low sanitation coverage and the associated health impact in the target villages requires a focused sanitation and hygiene approach. Hygiene is proven to be the most effective method of reducing diarrhoea for WASH approaches, followed by sanitation and lastly water (Bamford & Scharp, 2016). Increasing water provision does not automatically translate into improved hygiene practices and health outcomes.
The overall objective of the study is to conduct a diagnostic of the rural sanitation supply and value chain in distinct physical and market environments, demand and requirement of related products focusing on the commonly found or most preferred products and services for improved sanitation in rural Myanmar (including below ground and above-ground sanitation facilities).
The specific objectives were-
To explore the function and map of the current sanitation of the supply chain by making a profile of the different key players in the sanitation supply chain (products, services, activities, profitability);
To explore the existing gaps in the supply chain, consumer preferences, and level of current consumer satisfaction of current sanitation goods and services includes the ability for the current supply chain to reach and accessed by the most vulnerable in the 8 project communities such as People with Disability, female-headed households and elder people;
To utilize the findings of study for establishing supply chain models of common use products and services that reach the rural poor and marginalized groups to provide recommendations on sanitation of supply chain distribution.
entities typically include suppliers, producers, transporters, wholesalers, retailers and consumers.
Structure of WASH Industry
WASH industry is quite complicated and composed of different sectors, several entities, and different supply chains. In general, there are three main components in WASH industry as-
Water Access
Toiletry
Hand Washing, Sanitation and Hygiene products.
Under Water Access, there are two subcomponents- Clean water (rainy & dry season) and Drinking water. Related to Toiletry, there have sub supplies such as PVC pipe, iron sheet, pen, slab/concrete, bamboo/wooden, bricks, and construction materials like as Mason, Carpenter as human resource. The sanitation and hygiene products, such as Detergent, Soap, Shampoo, Toothpaste, Hygiene products are essential part of supply chain.
WASH is the collective term for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene. Assess to clean water is very important for public health issues. More than 97% of the total water sources of the world is salty water and there is nearly 3% of the total water source can be used for human, animals and agricultural production. If people say water is life, sanitation is the backbone of the lives. Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) is the basic needs of people. Increasing access to Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) is central to meet the global development goals. However, access to improved sanitation is still a major challenge in developing countries. The major challenges are-
Changing behaviours towards adopting improved sanitation practices, and
Providing a supply chain of services and materials for building latrines for the rural population (Thomas, 2014).
In Myanmar, there are several water resources; more than 19,000 m2 per capita each year, which is about 9 times the available levels in China, 16 times India, 5 times Vietnam and 16 times Bangladesh (Netherlands Embassy in Bangkok and Netherlands Economic Mission in Yangon, 2015). According to the report of the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of National Planning and Economic Development, overall 82.3% of the population use an improved source of drinking-water, 93.2% in urban and 77.6% in rural areas.
Methods used for safe and sustainable management of human excreta including the collection, storage, treatment and disposal of faecal matter. The hard or physical infrastructure (e.g. latrines, wastewater treatment facilities, sanitation platform) which make sanitation services possible.
This supply chain analysis is an analysis of the rural sanitation supply and value chain in distinct physical and marketing environments. It focuses on the commonly found or most preferred products and services for improved sanitation in Nyaung U Township, Myanmar. This study started from 5th June 2018 until the 27th June 2018 especially for developing questionnaires, interview guidelines are required for field arrangement. The data collection process took for 10 days including conduction of a half day workshop with field team which was conducted after the data collection as sharing the findings and recommendations for the finding and future strategy for supply chain development process of this project.
The study analyses the opportunities, issues, constraints (including market and non-market impediments) and potential risks with the current supply chain and its capabilities, particularly in reaching the base of the pyramid. It also maps existing actors and stakeholders, up and down the supply chain of sanitation goods and services and the relationships between them. The study aims to identify possible business models, interventions and support services which have the potential to improve the availability of affordable sanitation products and services to rural low- income households. The findings – along with the separate study of consumer behaviour – will inform the Government’s national sanitation marketing and behaviour change communication strategy and implementation plan(refer to figure 1). This study was employed in mixed method and more focus to qualitative methods. An initial desk study was conducted to collect and summarize the information from currently available reports and studies. It has provided guidance to issues that needed to be the focus of the field research. To correspond to the study design, this study employed more focus in qualitative method data collection. As the initial learning process, limited timeframe and resource, study applied qualitive tools and this type of study can contribute to the development of comprehensive survey instruments and generate hypothesis about association that can be tested in future quantitative studies (Vaismoradi, Turunen & Bondas, 2013; Ritchie, Spencer & O’Connor, 2003) stated that qualitative method are also useful “to understand the meanings which people attach to phenomena (actions, decisions, beliefs, values etc.) within their social worlds”.
In qualitative data collection, the existing actors and stakeholders, up and down the supply chain of sanitation goods and services and the relationships between them (from households, to suppliers (local and international) and manufacturers of raw materials. Mapping also included the existing business environments in the sanitation supply chain, identified possible business models and support services, which have potential to scale up the availability of aspirational and affordable sanitation products and services to rural low-income households. As additional the study finds out existing gaps in the supply chain, consumer preferences, and level of current consumer satisfaction of current sanitation goods and services. This also includes the ability for the current supply chain to reach and be accessed by the most vulnerable in the 8 project communities (e.g. Female-headed households). Combined with results from the consumer research (to be undertaken and procured separately), insights from this supply chain analysis will assist the Plan Myanmar Organization, Government and its partners to develop an evidence-based sanitation marketing and communication strategy aimed at improving rural sanitation at large scale. The field work component of data collection was conducted using qualitative research techniques particularly Key Informant Interviews (KII), small group meetings, and Focus Group Discussions (FGD). Key informants and participants to the meetings and FGDs consisted of farmers, traders, processors, masons, service providers, and representatives from the respective project areas and supply chain linkage geographical location such as Kyaukpadaung Township which is neighbour township of Nyaung U Township. A focus group is a planned, facilitated discussion among a small groups of stakeholders designed to obtain perceptions in a defined area of interest in a permissive, no- threatening environment (Campbell, 2008). Semi-structured household-based and services- based questionnaires were developed and conducted for quantitative data collection. 54 household was visited and interviewed relevant to their demand and opinion on their current practices and usages of sanitation and hygiene utilities. See the study location in figure 2 study team visited to 6 villages of in Nyaung Oo Township.
Regarding the KAP Report, information on water and sanitation conditions is required for assessing the health situation of the population as well as assessing the fulfilment of basic needs. Moreover, they composed as an important component for construction of the Wealth Index. Sources with better protection from contamination included brick-lined well, borehole, hand pump, protected pond and rainwater collection tank. By comparison, sources with no or little protection from contamination included well with no wall, pond with no fence or protection, stream, river and others (KAP, 2016).
The table 1 shows the utilization of water sources for each of the three seasons. In the rainy season, 51% use the rainwater and 43% use the surface water. In the winter season, 29% use the tube well/ Borehole for drinking water and 52% use surface water. In the summer season, 65% use the tube well/ Borehole for drinking water and 21% use surface water. Overall, 32% of respondents use the tube well/ borehole and 39% use surface water for drinking.
Source: KAP Survey Report, Htee Pu WASH Project, Jan 2017
The table 2 below shows the utilization of water sources for each of the three seasons. In the rainy season, 50% use the rainwater and 44% use the surface water for kitchen usage water. In the winter season, 33% use the tube well/ Borehole for kitchen usage water and 50% use surface water. In the summer season, 71% use the tube well/ Borehole for kitchen usage water and 18% use surface water. Overall, 36% of respondents use the tube well/ borehole and 37% use surface water for kitchen usage water. Emergency water source of household about 64.5% of the respondents said they have difficulty in getting water for drinking or for kitchen/ general use. Type of latrine was categorized into two: fly proof; and non-fly-proof. Fly proof type consisted of fly proof latrine and direct pit latrine. Non-fly-proof type comprised latrine with no pit or no cover, defecating in bushes and other types. It was discovered that most households, 64.1 percent, used latrine with good sanitary condition.
Source: KAP Survey Report, Htee Pu WASH Project, Jan 2017
Refers to individuals and organizations that provide goods and services required for construction of sanitation facilities. These are traders, markets or shops, manufacturers, contractors, transporters and others. Sanitation goods are materials and products. Sanitation services are technical knowledge/skills, transport etc. required for construction of sanitation facilities.
explain much about importing procedures and market functions at importers level. Many products have been imported from China and Thailand.
Mandalay. The most utilized cement brands are Kyant Hna Kaung, Sin Min (Royal Elephant), Tiger Head, Alpha. Lime is supplied from Mandalay whereas Sands and stones are bought from nearby places, getting sand from the river and streams nearby is prohibited.
Hand Washing, Sanitation and Hygiene Products
Actors engaged in hand washing, sanitation and hygiene products are manufacturers, importers, wholesalers/dealers, retailers including village vendors. The figure 4 shows the Supply Chain Map of Sanitation and Hygiene Products.
CONCLUSION
This study will be helpful for promoting rural sanitation and hygiene products and services in dry zone areas. It will critically inform the design of interventions to support strengthen market- based solution and pro-poor support mechanisms such as Sanitation Demand Creation, Behaviour Change Communication, and disability and gender integration. The study implies that the research did not reach the most rural communities but only those rural communities with at least one supply chain stakeholder.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the reflection results and experience of the study team in Dry Zone, Myanmar, the project designing, implementing and monitoring market-based approaches to generate measurable improvements in healthy behaviors including use of hygienic sanitation, the following suggestions are provided consistent with promoting the Sanitation and Hygiene Market Development-
Developing locally specific sanitation market maps
Coordinating with hygiene or sanitation market players in related locations
Conducting policy research related to Tax or VAT exception for Sanitation and Hygiene items importing or productions by the Host organization at the national level.
Capacity of building quality and locally appropriate latrines by:
Training masons; volunteers - Providing additional support to increase sanitation-specific business for trained masons or carpenter.
Facilitating bulk transport of heavier materials to select areas to reduce transportation costs;
Encouraging retailers to stock and masons to use less expensive but appropriate materials;
Depending on latrine model specifications, developing user-friendly guidelines to help consumers “do-it-yourself” (part or all, depending on latrine type).
It is rare to have all the resident expertise that can aid with a diverse set of constraints or training for a wide range of competencies. Furthermore, investment in program delivery personnel and assets makes it more difficult to react proactively to changing market demands. A facilitation role that can utilize a coordinating position in the supply chain would therefore be more consistent with market-based and sustainability principles. It enables government or its
development partners to work more effectively with private sector organizations in the delivery of services.
The research team did not reach the outside project villages in very remote villages because in these villages supply chain actors are not present and interviewing poor households was not in the project scope. This implies that the research did not reach the most rural communities but only those rural communities with at least one supply chain stakeholder. However, actors were asked about the location of their customers and their ability to serve remote rural areas. Finally, the research location did not include the whole supply chain. For example, manufacturers and suppliers in China, Thailand and Myanmar Border Trading Area except Yangon City were outside the geographic scope of the project, yet these businesses are an important part of the chain. Also, construction material suppliers in Magwe and Muse (and some other towns) play a role in the supply chains studied but these were not in the selected research districts. The data may also suffer from selection bias. Those above-mentioned interview actors who were prepared to be interviewed may not be representative of the population. However, it is not clear in what direction this bias might affect the data. Some actors refused to be interviewed (some citing that are too often asked questions by sanitation programs) and some of these tended to be larger suppliers.
REFERENCES
Bamford, E. & Scharp, C. (2016). Solar Pump Technology: Programming Insights for Sustainable Rural Water Supply. 7th RWSN Forum. 29th November-02 December. Retrieved From:https://rwsnforum7.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/full_paper_0227_submitter_0287_ba mford_emily.pdf
Campbell, R. (2008). Guide to Focus Group Discussion, Micro Report No. 138. USAID. Retrieved From: https://www.marketlinks.org/sites/marketlinks.org/files/resource/files/ML6294_mr_138_guid e_to_focus_group_discussions.pdf
KAP. (2016). KAP Integrated Report 2016, Integrated into every day. Retrieved From: https://www.kap.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/kap-integrated-report-2016.pdf
Netherlands Embassy in Bangkok and Netherlands Economic Mission in Yangon. (2015). Water in Myanmar. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, April. Retrieved From: https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2016/03/Factsheet water Myanmar.pdf.
Richie, J., Spencer, L. & O’Connor, W. (2003) Carrying Out Qualitative Analysis. In: Richie,
J. and Lewis, J. Eds., Qualitative Research Practice. Sage. London. Retrieved From: http://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?Refer enceID=668878
Thomas, A. (2014) Key Findings of a Sanitation Supply Chains Study in Eastern and Southern Africa. UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa Sanitation and Hygiene Learning Series. WASH Technical Brief, UNICEF, London. Retrieved From: https://www.unicef.org/esaro/WASH- Technical-SSCS-low-res.pdf
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H. & Bondas, T. (2013). Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis: Implications for Conducting a Qualitative Descriptive Study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), pp 398-405.